[00:00:01]
APOLOGIZE[ AGENDA PROPERTY MAINTENANCE REVIEW BOARD City Governance Center - Council Chambers 6151 Brandt Pike August 13, 2026 6:30 P.M.]
FOR STARTING A FEW MINUTES LATE, BUT, UH, LIKE TO CALL THE MEETING, MEETING OF THE CITY OF HUBER HEIGHTS MAINTENANCE REVIEW, PROPERTY MAINTENANCE REVIEW BOARD ORDER PLEASE.AND MADAM SECRETARY, WILL YOU CALL THE ROLL? ALL RIGHT.
UH, I'D LIKE TO HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE TONIGHT'S AGENDA.
THE AGENDA FOR TONIGHT'S MEETING IS APPROVED.
NEXT, I'LL NEED TO SWEAR IN MY WITNESS, WITNESSES OUR WITNESS, AND, UM, RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND IF YOU WOULD.
DO YOU HEREBY SWEAR OR AFFIRM ON THE THREAT OF PERJURY TO TELL THE TRUTH, THE WHOLE TRUTH, AND NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH, SO HELP YOU GOD? I DO.
I DON'T SEE ANYBODY HERE TO SPEAK.
YOU'RE NOT GONNA GET UP AND SPEAK, ARE YOU
UH, I DON'T SEE WHERE THERE'S ANY PENDING BUSINESS.
AND SO WE'LL START OUT WITH NEW BUSINESS, UH, PMRB CASE 26 DASH 17.
THE PROPERTY OWNER, MICHAEL CLARK, IS IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 1313 OF THE PROPERTY MAINTENANCE CODE AT PROPERTY LOCATED 92 0 1 ARTS ROAD.
UH, THE PROPERTY AT 92 0 1 ARTS ROAD IS IN VIOLATION OF CITY CODE 13 13 0 4 H SIX AS IT APPLIES TO OUTDOOR STORAGE OR USE, THERE IS JUNK THROUGH THROUGHOUT THE PROPERTY.
PARAGRAPH B OF THE AFOREMENTIONED AND ARTICLE SAYS, ALL PERMISSIBLE ITEMS STORED OUTSIDE MUST BE IN GOOD CONDITION AND USABLE AS INTENDED BY THE MANUFACTURER.
NO SUCH ITEMS THAT ARE BROKEN, DILAPIDATED, OR DISCARDED SHALL BE STORED OUTSIDE.
INSPECTION, VERIFIES THE PROPERTY DOES NOT MEET THE SETS, THE STANDARDS SET FORTH IN THE CODE, THEREFORE, THE PROPERTY'S IN VIOLATION.
YOUR ATTACHED CASE REVIEW ILLUSTRATES THE VIOLATION PROCESS AND NON-COMPLIANCE OF THE PROPERTY.
THE ATTACHED PHOTO SHOWS THE EXTENT OF THE VIOLATION.
THE REQUIRED COURSE OF THREE LETTERS WAS MAILED TO THE OWNER.
THE OWNER LEFT A VOICEMAIL FOR THE ZONING OFFICER, BUT UPON RETURNING THE CALL, THERE WAS NO ANSWER AND QUOTE, THE MAILBOX WAS FULL AND UNABLE TO ACCEPT INCOMING CALLS.
UNQUOTE, THERE HAS BEEN NO FURTHER COMMUNICATION TO THE ZONING OFFICE FROM THE PROPERTY OWNER.
IT APPEARS THE PROPERTY IS OCCUPIED.
TAX RECORDS SHOWS PROPERTY TAXES ARE TRADITIONALLY PAID.
IF DECLARED A NUISANCE BY THE BOARD, THE PROPERTY WILL BE ABATED BY THE CITY.
ANY COSTS INCURRED BY THE CITY WILL BE INVOICED TO THE PROPERTY OWNER.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS AS FOLLOWS, THE BOARD DECLARED THE PROPERTY A NUISANCE.
THE BOARD ORDERS STAFF TO HAVE THE CITY ABATE TO THE PROPERTY.
IF SO ORDERED, THE CITY WILL BRING THE PROPERTY INTO COMPLIANCE BY REMOVAL OF THE NUISANCE BY THE CITY'S CONTRACTOR.
ALRIGHT, QUESTIONS? ANYONE? ALRIGHT, HAVE A MOTION PLEASE.
WE DECLARE THE PROPERTY A NUISANCE AND HAVE STAFF A RIGHT? WE HAVE A SECOND.
SO MOTION CARRIES FOR PMRB CASE 26 DASH 17.
NEXT CASE IS PM RRB 26 DASH 18.
THE PROPERTY OWNER, FRED LINDENMEYER IS IN SEC, IS IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 1313 OF THE PROPERTY MAINTENANCE CODE AT PROPERTY LOCATED AT 57 73 BOTKINS ROAD.
YOU KNOW, I'M GONNA LET JERRY CATCH.
SO TOO BIG YOU CAN'T EVEN SEE HIM.
THE PROPERTY AT 57 73 BOTKINS ROAD IS IN VIOLATION OF
[00:05:01]
CITY CODE 13 13 0 4 H FOUR AS IT APPLIES TO MAINTENANCE OF THE LANDSCAPING LAWN.THE PROPERTY HAS BEEN IGNORED OVER THE YEARS AS WELL AS UNOCCUPIED SECTION 13 13 0 4 H FOUR STATES.
ALL LAND SHALL BE PROPERLY MAINTAINED WITH LAWNS, HEDGES, BUSHES, TREES, AND OTHER VEGETATION TO BE TRIMMED AND KEPT FROM, BECOME, BECOMING OVERGROWN AND UNSIGHTLY WE'RE EXPOSED TO PUBLIC VIEW OR SUCH.
VEGETATION MAY CONSTITUTE A BLIGHTING INFLUENCE ON ADJOINING PROPERTY INSPECTION.
VERIFIES THE PROPERTY DOES NOT MEET THE STANDARDS SET FORTH IN THE CODE, THEREFORE THE PROPERTY IS IN VIOLATION.
YOUR ATTACHED CASE REVIEW ILLUSTRATES THE VIOLATION PROCESS AND NON-COMPLIANCE OF THE PROPERTY.
THE ATTACHED PHOTO SHOWS THE EXTENT OF THE VIOLATION THAT ALSO CONTINUES INTO THE BACKYARD.
THE REQUIRED COURSE OF THREE LETTERS WAS MAILED TO THE OWNER.
THE OWNER CONTACTED THE ZONING OFFICER AND PROMISED TO BRING THEIR PROPERTY INTO COMPLIANCE.
BUT NO WORK HAS BEEN COMPLETED.
NO IMPROVEMENTS HAVE BEEN MADE.
AND I'LL MENTION IN PASSING, WE'VE HAD THAT SAME CONVERSATION WITH THIS PROPERTY OWNER OVER THE YEARS.
UH, IN MY OPINION, THIS PROPERTY IS AING INFLUENCE ON ADJACENT PROPERTIES.
THE TAX RECORD SHOWS PROPERTY TAXES ARE TRADITIONALLY PAID IF DECLARED NUISANCE BY THE BOARD, THE PROPERTY WILL BE ABATED BY THE CITY AND COSTS INCURRED BY THE CITY WILL BE INVOICED TO THE PROPERTY OWNER.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS AS FOLLOWS, THE BOARD DECLARE THE PROPERTY A NUISANCE.
THE BOARD ORDERS STAFF TO HAVE THE CITY ABATE THE PROPERTY.
IF SO ORDERED, THE CITY WILL BRING THE PROPERTY INTO COMPLIANCE BY REMOVAL OF A NU NUISANCE BY THE CITY'S CONTRACTOR.
THIS WILL INVOLVE EXTENSIVE TRIMMING OF ALL OVERGROWTH AT THE PROPERTY.
MAY I HAVE A MOTION PLEASE? I'LL MAKE A MOTION THAT WE DECLARE THE PROPERTY NUISANCE AND HAVE THE CITY ABATE IT.
SO MOTION CARRIES FOR CASE PMRB 26 DASH 18.
UH, THE PROPERTY OWNER, CLARK MOSER IS IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 1313 OF THE PROPERTY MAINTENANCE CODE AT PROPERTY LOCATED AT 5,700 MALLARD DRIVE.
OKAY, SO THIS IS ALMOST A RERUN OF THE ONE WE JUST SPOKE OF.
PROPERTY AT 5,700 MALLARD IS IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 13 TO 1304 H FOUR AS IT APPLIES TO PROPERTY MAINTENANCE OF THE LANDSCAPING AND LAWN.
THE LANDSCAPING GOT THE PROPERTY HAS BEEN IGNORED OVER THE YEARS DESPITE THE HOME BEING OCCUPIED.
SECTION 13 13 0 4 H FOUR STATES, ALL LAND SHALL BE PROPERLY MAINTAINED WITH LAWNS, HEDGES, BUSHES, TREES, AND OTHER VEGETATION TO BE TRIMMED AND KEPT FROM BECOMING OVERGROWN AND UNSIGHTLY.
WE'RE EXPOSED TO PUBLIC VIEW OR SUCH.
VEGETATION MAY CONSTITUTE A DELIGHTING INFLUENCE ON ADJACENT PROPERTIES, EXCUSE ME, ON ADJOINING PROPERTY INSPECTION.
VERIFIES THE PROPERTY DOES NOT MEET THE STANDARD SET FORTH IN THE CODE, THEREFORE THE PROPERTY IS IN VIOLATION.
YOUR ATTACHED CASE REVEAL ILLUSTRATES THE VIOLATION PROCESS AND NON-COMPLIANCE OF THE PROPERTY.
THE ATTACHED PHOTO SHOWS THE EXTENT OF THE VIOLATION THAT ALSO CONTINUES INTO THE REAR YARD.
THE REQUIRED COURSE OF THROUGH LETTERS WAS MAILED TO THE OWNER.
THERE HAS BEEN NO COMMUNICATION BY THE RESIDENT TO THE ZONING OFFICE.
IN MY OPINION, THE PROPERTY IS A OBLIGING AND INFLUENCE ON ADJACENT PROPERTIES.
THE TAX RECORD SHOWS PROPERTY TAXES ARE TRADITIONALLY PAID.
IF DECLARED A NUISANCE BY THE BOARD, THE PROPERTY WILL BE ABATED BY THE CITY.
ANY COSTS TO INCURRED BY THE CITY WILL BE INVOICED TO THE PROPERTY OWNER.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS AS FOLLOWS, THE BOARD TO DECLARE THE PROPERTY A NUISANCE, THE BOARD ORDERS STAFF TO HAVE THE CITY ABATE THE PROPERTY.
IF SO ORDERED, THE CITY WILL BRING THE PROPERTY INTO COMPLIANCE BY REMOVAL OF THE NUISANCE BY THE CITY'S CONTRACTOR.
THIS WILL INVOLVE EXTENSIVE TRIMMING OF ALL OVERGROWTH AT THE PROPERTY.
AND UPON THAT WE MAY ALL AS WELL
[00:10:02]
DO SOME CURSORY REPAIR TO THE ROOF IF WE DETERMINE THE MISSING SHINGLES ARE ACTUALLY ALLOWING WATER TO PASS INTO THE PROPERTY.I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO DECLARE THE PROPERTY AND DO THINGS AND HAVE THE CITY ABATE IT.
THE PROPERTY OWNER LONG INVESTMENT ENTERPRISES LLC IS IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 1313 OF THE PROPERTY MAINTENANCE CODE.
THAT PROPERTY LOCATED AT 78 38 HARSHMAN ROAD FOR SAID PROPERTY'S IN VIOLATION OF CITY CODE 1313 OH H FOUR.
AS IT APPLIES TO MAINTENANCE OF THE LANDSCAPING AND LAWN, THE LANDSCAPING OF THE PROPERTY HAS BEEN IGNORED AND HAS BECOME SUBSTANTIALLY OVERGROWN.
SECTION 13 13 0 4 H FOUR STATES, ALL LAND SHALL BE PROPERLY MAINTAINED WITH LAWNS, HEDGES, BUSHES, TREES, AND OTHER VEGETATION TO BE TRIMMED AND KEPT FROM BECOMING OVERGROWN AND UNSIGHTLY WE'RE EXPOSED TO PUBLIC VIEW OR SUCH.
VEGETATION MAY CONSULTATION, BLIGHTING INFLUENCE ON ADJOINING PROPERTY INSPECTION VERIFIES THE PROPERTY DOES NOT MEET THE STANDARDS SET FORTH IN THE CODE.
THEREFORE THE PROPERTY IS IN VIOLATION.
YOUR ATTACHED CASE REVIEW ILLUSTRATES THE VIOLATION PROCESS AND NON-COMPLIANCE OF THE PROPERTY.
THE REQUIRED COURSE OF THREE LETTERS WAS MAILED TO THE OWNER.
THERE HAS BEEN NO COMMUNICATION BY THE OWNER TO THE ZONING OFFICE.
IN ADDITION TO THAT, THE TENANT WHO SAYS THEY'RE IN TRANSITION CONTACTED ME BECAUSE I CALLED A PHONE NUMBER, THE SIDE OF THE VAN.
YOU MAY NOTICE PARKED IN THE DRIVEWAY.
UM, HE MADE IT SOUND LIKE THEY WERE IN THE PROCESS OF MOVING.
WE'VE NEVER SEEN ANY EVIDENCE OF ANYONE LIVING THERE.
AND SUBSEQUENT TO WHAT YOU'RE SEEING THERE, THAT ENTIRE PROPERTY HAS BEEN MOWED BY OUR CONTRACTOR.
THE PROPERTY HAS BEEN REPORTED TO US AS VACANT.
IT APPEARS THAT INDEED IS INDEED THE CASE.
PROPERTY IS IN SIMULTANEOUSLY IN VIOLATION.
FORMO GRASS WHICH WILL BE ASSIGNED TO THE CITY.
CONTRACTORS ARE SEPARATE BY VIOLATION, WHICH AS I JUST STATED, HAS BEEN HANDLED.
IN MY OPINION, THIS PROPERTY IS A GLIDING INFLUENCE ON ADJACENT PROPERTIES.
TAX RECORDS SHOWS PROPERTY TAXES ARE TRADITIONALLY PAID.
IF DECLARED A NUISANCE BY THE BOARD, THE PROPERTY WILL BE ABATED BY THE CITY.
ANY COSTS INCURRED BY THE CITY WILL BE INVOICED TO THE PROPERTY OWNER.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS AS FOLLOWS, THE BOARD DECLARE THE PROPERTY A NUISANCE.
THE BOARD ORDER TO STAFF TO HAVE THE CITY ABATE TO THE PROPERTY.
IF SO AWARDED, THE CITY WILL BRING THE PROPERTY INTO COMPLIANCE BY REMOVAL OF THE NUISANCE BY THE CITY'S CONTRACT.
THIS WILL INVOLVE TRIMMING OF ALL OVERGROWTH AT THE PROPERTY THAT WILL BE PRINCIPALLY IN THE REAR YARD.
THE MOWING, UH, TOOK CARE OF MOST OF THE PROBLEM OF THE FRONT YARD.
THE COMPLAINT WE WERE GETTING FROM ADJACENT PROPERTIES PERTAINED TO THE REAR YARD.
THERE'S QUITE A BIT OF OVERGROWTH IN THE REAR YARD BEYOND THE GRASS.
UM, BUT WE'LL PROBABLY CLEAN UP WHAT YOU'RE SEEING IN THE FRONT, IN FRONT OF THE GARAGE AS WELL.
QUESTIONS? ANYONE? ALRIGHT, HAVE A MOTION PLEASE.
I'LL MAKE A MOTION THAT WE DECLARE THE PROPERTY OF NUISANCE AND HAVE THE CITY ABATE IT.
SO MOTION CARRIES FOR PMRB CASE 26 DASH 20.
AND UH, NEXT WOULD BE THE APPROVAL OF MINUTES.
UM, IF THERE'S NO OBJECTION TO THE MINUTES OF JULY THE NINTH, UM, I WILL PROVE THE MINUTES.
THE NEXT MEETING THEN IS GONNA BE SEPTEMBER THE 10TH, 2026.
[00:15:01]
ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO ADJOURN.