Nov 10, 2025 City Council Meeting

A MOVE AND A SECOND. IS THERE DISCUSSION? TONY?

>> MOTION CARRIES. 9 TO 0.

[ A Motion To Reappoint Christopher Darrin, John Roberts, And Richard Winkler To The Property Maintenance Review Board For A Term Ending December 31, 2028.]

S ITEM 11G.

>> A MOTION TO REAPPOINT CHRISTOPHER DARRIN, JOHN ROBERTS, AND RICHARD WINKLER TO THE PROPERTY MAINTENANCE REVIEW BOARD FOR THE TERM

DECEMBER 31, 2028. >> MOTION

TO APPOINT. >> WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND.

TONY?

[ A Motion To Reappoint Samuel Richardson To The Tax Review Board For A Term Ending December 31, 2027.]

>> MOTION CARRIES 9 TO 0. NEXT IS ITEM 11H.

>> A MOTION TO REAPPOINT SAMUEL RICHARDSON TO THE TAX REVIEW BOARD FOR THE TERM ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2027.

>> I MOVE TO APPROVE.

>> SCOTT?

>> A MOTION AND A SECOND.

TONY?

[ A Resolution Authorizing The City Manager To Enter Into A Contract With The Montgomery County Public Defender Commission To Provide Statutorily Required Legal Counsel To Indigent Persons For Fiscal Year 2026. (first reading)]

>> MOTION CARRIES 9 TO 0. NEXT IS ITEM 11I.

A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO ENTER INTO A CONTRACT WITH THE MINUTE ON BOMBRY COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDER COMMISSION TO PROVIDE STATUTORILY REQUIRED LEGAL COUNSEL TO INDIGENT PERSONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2026. FIRST READING.

TONY, COMMENTS?

>> THIS IS THE ITEM I BRING BEFORE YOEACH YEAR FOR THE REAPPROVAL FOR THE NEXT YEAR OF THE CONTRACT TH DEFENDER Y COUNTY PUBLIC

[00:10:03]

AND PREVIOUSLY APPROVED THE ONE FROM LANDEN COUNTY AT THE PREVIOUS MEETING AND I WOULD ASK FOR COUNCIL'S APPROVAL.

IS THERE A RECOMMENDATION AND A MOTION?

>> MOVE TO APPROVE.

>> SECOND?

>> SECOND. >> WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND. IS THERE DISCUSSION? TONY?

[ A Public Hearing Scheduled For November 10, 2025 By The Huber Heights City Council For Case BDP 25-23. The Applicant Is Dublin 7. The Applicant Is Requesting Approval Of A Basic Development Plan For An Irish Pub-Themed Restaurant For Property Located At 6900 Executive Boulevard And Further Described As Parcel Number P70 01820 0013 On The Montgomery County Auditor's Map.]

>> MOTION CARRIES 9 TO 0. NEXT IS ITEM 11J.

>> A PUBLIC HEARING SCHEDULED FOR NOVEMBER 10, 2025, BY THE HUBER HEIGHTS CITY COUNCIL FOR CASE BDP 25-23. THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING APPROVAL OF A BASIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR AN IRISH PUB-THEMED RESTAURANT FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 6900 EXECUTIVE BOULEVARD FURTHER DESCRIBED AS PARCEL NUMBER P70-01820- 0013 ON THE MONTGOMERY COUNTY AUDITOR'S MAP.

>> THANK YOU, TONY. PUBLIC HEARING BY THE HUBER HEIGHTS CICOUNCIL FOR BDP-25-23 IS NOW OPEN, AND I WOULD CALL ON CITY STAFF TO MAKE THEIR INITIAL PRESENTATION.

>> MAYOR, MEMBERS OF THE COUNCIL, AARON SIRREL.

THIS IS A PLAN FOR KNOW IRISH-THEMED RESTAURANT THAT SITS ON 3. 7 ACRES ALONG EXECUTIVE BOULEVARD.

IT IS CURRENTLY ZONED WITH THE THE LAND IS PLANNED MIXED USE.

SO THIS IS THE SITE OUTLINED IN RED IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO THE ROSE MUSIC CENTER AND THEN THE HOTEL TO THE SOUTH AND TRUE BY HILTON. THIS IS THE SITE PLAN WHICH ILLUSTRATES THE BUILDING ON WEST SIDE OF THE SITE, PARKING LARGELY ON THE NORTHEAST PART OF THE SITE AND THEN THERE IS SOME ROOM IN THE REAR FOR TENTS AND THINGS OF THAT NATURE FOR A SPECIAL EVENT AND THE BUNG ON THE EAST SIDE AND THERE'S A SEASONAL BUILDING THAT'S AVAILABLE WITH A BEER GARDEN AND MORE OF A THREE- SEASON ROOM THAT WILL BE ALSO OPEN DURING THE SPRING AND SUMMER. THESE AR THE PROPOSED ELEVATIONS IT IS A OF GLASS, BRICK AND THE METAL ROOF AND ATTRACTIVE BUILDING AND THE TOP ELEVATION IS BASICALLY WHAT YOU WOULD SEE FROM THE EAST SIDE OF THE PARKING LOOKING WEST. THE GLASSED- IN PART IS THE BEER GARDEN. THIS WOULD BE THE ELEVATION TO THE SOUTH SO IF YOU'RE STANDING AT THE SOUTH PROPERTY AS YOU'RE LOOKING NORTH THAT WOULD BE WHAT YOU WOULD SEE.

THERE IS A ROOFTOP GATHERING AREA.

THIS, THE MAIN PICTURE IN THE MIDDLE IS THE BEER GARDEN AREA.

THERE IS A ROOFTOP SIGN WHICH IS BEING PROPOSED WHICH WE WILL WORK OUT THOSE DETAILS AS PART OF THE DETAILED DEVELOPMENT PLAN. OVERALL IT'S AN ATTRACTIVE BUILDING. IT IS A 7,000-SQUARE- FOOT RESTAURANT. AS I MENTIONED THERE IS A SEASONAL BEER GARDEN. THE RESTAURANT HAS THE CAPACITY OF APPROXIMATELY 450 INDIVIDUALS AT FULL CAPACITY WHICH WOULD BE A RARE EVENT, BUT IT IS BUILT FOR THOSE TYPES OF USES. AS FAR AS CONFORMANCE WITH THE PLANNED EMPLOYMENT PARK, ZONING IS CONSISTENT.

RETAIL USES ARE PERMITTED. AS FAR AS THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS AND THE ZONING CODE REQUIRES A TEN- FOOT PARKING SETBACK AND THE SETBACK IS WITH THE MINIMUM OF 20 FEET, THE EAST PARKING SETBACK IS APPROXIMATELY 15 FEET SO IT DOES MEET THOSE CONDITIONS.

THE ZONING CODE REQUIRES A 50-FOOT BUILDING FROM THE FRONT AND A 15- FOOT MINIMUM SIDE YARD SETBACK AND IT IS APPROXIMATELY 62 FEET AND THE SIDE YARD SETBACKS ARE APPROXIMATELY 20 FEET. THE PROPOSED BUILDING IS WELL WITHIN OUR HEIGHT LIMITATIONS ALONG EXECUTIVE BOULEVARD AT 26 FEET.

>> THE SITE PLAN ILLUSTRATES PARKING SPACES AND THIS IS ONE AREA OF THE CODE THAT IS A LITTLE EXCESSIVE.

BECAUSE THE SITE PLAN SHOWS IS PERMANENT SEATING FOR NEARLY 320 INDIVIDUALS. UNDER THE CODE 160 PARKING SPACES WOULD BE REQUIRED. STAFF OFOSED ON- SITE PAIS ADEQUATE, GIVEN WITH THE ROW, THE PARKING LOT IS IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT. ALSO, THE APPLICANT HAS IND TO US THAT THEY PLAN TO RUN A SHUTTLE -- NOT GAME NIGHTS -- ON CONCERT NIGHTS IN ORDER TO MAXIMIZE THEIR -- THEIR UTILIZATION. SO THE APPLICANT HAS HAD A

[00:15:01]

LONG HISTORY RUNNING RESTAURANTS IN THE AREA.

THEY FEEL THAT THE PARKING IS ADEQUATE, STAFF FEELS THE PARKING IS ADEQUATE, AS WELL. AS FAR AS THE BUILDING MATERIAL SECTION OF THE CODE, THE BUILDING ELEVATIONS ILLUSTRATE A SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT OF STONE VENEER WHICH IS CONSISTENT WITH OUR COMMERCIAL BUILDING MATERIAL REQUIREMENTS. AS FAR AS SIGNS, WHILE NOT NECESSARILY PART OF THIS DISCUSSION, THE SIGNAGE PLAN DOES ILLUSTRATE FIVE WALL SIGNS WITH A TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE OF 215 SQUARE FEET AND THEY'RE ATTRACTIVE PROPORTIONAL SIGNS. THOSE DETAILS WILL BE WORKED OUT DURING THE DETAIL DEVELOPMENT PLAN. STAFF DOES SUPPORT ALL OF THE MAIN BUILDING SIGNS THAT I MENTIONED DURING THE WORK SESSION. WE'VE GOT SOME WORK TO DO ON THE ROOFTOP SIGN BECAUSE OUR CODE DOES NOT NECESSARILY LOOK FAVORABLE ON THE ROOFTOP SIGNS. THE MAIN CONCERN FROM THE STAFF PERSPECTIVE IS WE DON'T WANT IT TO BE TOO BRIGHT BECAUSE THAT WOULD BE SHINING INDIRECTLY IN THE TRUE BY HILTON AND WE'LL WORK THOSE DETAILS OUT WITH THE APPLICANT. LANDSCAPING WILL BE REVIEWED AND ALSO LIGHTING WILL BE REVIEWED DURING THE DETAIL DEVELOPMENT PLAN PHASE. IT IS THE STAFF'S OPINION THAT THE REQUIREMENTS OF N 117106 CAN BE MET ASK WE RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE BASIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN AS SUBMITTED.

AS I MENTIONED THE LANDSCAPING WILL BE REVIEWED THROUGH THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPLICATION.

NO ONE SPOKE IN OPPOSITION OF THE PROJECT AT PLANNING COMMISSION, AND THE PLANNING COMMISSION UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDED APPROVAL OF THE BASIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN.

>> THANK YOU. IF THERE'S ANYONE HERE THAT WOULD LIKE TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION THEY ARE WELCOME TO.

>> I DON'T BELIEVE THERE ARE.

>> NEXT I CALL ON THE DIRECTOR TO MAKE ANY COMMENTS OR PR ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IF YOU HAVE ANY.

>> NONE TODAY.

>> OKAY. THANK YOU.

IS THERE ANYONE PRESENT WHO WISHES TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF THE APPROVAL OF THIS ISSUE THIS EVENING? IS THERE ANYONE PRESENT WHO WISHES TO SPEAK AGAINSTAGAINST APPROVAL OF THIS ISSUE THIS EVENING? OKAY. NEXT, I CALL ON MEMBERS OF THE HUBER HEIGHTS CITY COUNCILCOUNCIL TO COMMENTS, ASK QUESTIONS OR PROVIDE ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

IF YOU HAVE ANY. >> AARON, DIYOU SAY THAT THEY WOULD NOT HOLD EVENTS THE OF THE CONCERT OR THAT THEY

WILL? >> THEY WILL.

MOST CERTAINLY THEY WILL HOLD EVENTS THE NIGH CONCERT. THEY PLAN TO RUN A THE TLE BACK AND FORTH BETWEEN

RESTAURANT AND THE MAIN GATES. >> OKAY, AND IS THERE ANY ROOM ANYWHERE FOR THE EXPANSION OF THE PARKING IF THAT PROVES TO BE AN ISSUE IN THE FUTURE?

>> THERE IS. TO THE SOUTH OF THE SITE THERE IS A SECONDARY DRIVEWAY THAT COMES IN ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE BUILDING. SO IF THERE IS A PROBLEM IN THE FUTURE THEYDO HAVE ROOM TO EXPAND A SECONDARY G LOT BETWEEN THE HOTEL AND THEIR BUILDING.

>> SCOTT? LAST WEEKAT THEY DID HAVEHAVE ROWS AND THEY HAD NO PROBLEM SHARING THAT.

THANK YOU.

>> WE'VE HAD THE SAME -- SOMEWHAT SIMILAR SITUATION WITH THE WARPED WING.

>> THAT'S ALL I HAVE, MAYOR. THANK YOU.

>> OKAY. HER QUESTIONS? COMMENTS? I'LL ASK ONE MORE TIME IF THERE IS ANYONE PRESENT WHO WISHES TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF OR AGAINST THIS ISSUE. BAR ANYTHING FURTHER COMMENTS THE PUBLIC MEETING FOR CASE BDP

[ A Public Hearing Scheduled For November 10, 2025 By The Huber Heights City Council For Case BDP 25-24. The Applicant Is The City Of Huber Heights. The Applicant Is Requesting Approval Of A Basic Development Plan For A Proposed 3,500 Patron Capacity Indoor Music Venue For Property Located At 7151 Executive Boulevard And Further Described As Parcel Numbers P70 03910 0083 And P70 03910 0084 On The Montgomery County Auditor's Map.]

25- 23 IS HEREBY CLOSED. NEXT IS LEGAL 11K.

>> A PUBLIC HEARING SCHEDULED FOR NOVEMBER 20, 2025, BY THE HUBER HEIGHTS CITY COUNCIL FOR CASE BDP 25- 24, THE APPLICANT IS THE CITY OF HUBER HEIGHTS.

IT IS REQUESTING APPROVAL OF A BASIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR A PROPOSED 3500 PATRON CAPACITY INDOOR MUSIC VENUE FOR PARCEL P70-03910-0083 AND P70-03910-0084 OF THE MONTGOMERY COUNTY AUDITOR'S MAP.

>> NOVEMBER 10, 2025, BY THE HUBER HEIGHTS CITY COUNCIL IS NOW OPEN. I WILL CALL ON THE STAFF TO MAKE THE INITIAL PRESENTATION.

>> OKAY. WE ARE MOVING JUST A LITTLE EAST ON EXECUTIVE BOULEVARD TO THIS 18- ACRE SITE THAT'S OWNED BY THE CITY OF HUBER HEIGHTS. WE ARE PROPOSING -- WE ARE SEEKING APPROVAL FOR A BECAME DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR A

[00:20:01]

PROPOSED 3500 PATRONPATRON MUSIC VENUE.

THIS IS THE 18- ACRE SITE OUTLINED IN RED. THIS IS THE PROPOSED SITE.

BUILDING SETBACK SLIGHTLY FROM EXECUTIVE BOULEVARD.

AS PART OF THIS PROCESS WE HAVE BEEN COTINGMOST OR ALLALL OF DEVELOPMENT WITH OUR POTENTIAL PARTNERS D ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS. THIS IS THE STORM WATER MASTER PLAN WHICH IS PART OF THE BASIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN.

POND NUMBER THREE IS CURRENTLY CONSTRUCTED AND THAT'S THE SHEETS RETENTION POND THAT WE BUILT AT THE TIME LARGE AS POSSIBLE.

PONDS ONE AND TWO ARE BEING CONSTRUCTED BY ONE AS PART OF THEIR RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT AND AS PART OF THE MUSIC CENTER DEVELOPMENT, POND 4 WHICH IS JUST NORTH OF MEYER WOULD BE CONSTRUCTED WHICH WOULD THEN SERVE FOR THE DETENTION CAPACITY FOR THE REMAINDER OF THIS SITE.

ACTUALLY POND 4 WOULD REALLY NEED TO BE DEVELOPED REGARDLESS IN ORDER TO MAXIMIZE THE LAND UTILIZATION NORTH OF EXECUTIVE BOULEVARD. AS FAR AS TRANSPORTATION AND INGRESS AND EGRESS, THERE WILL BE THREE MAIN ENTRANCES.

THERE WILL BE A CENTER SPINE ON THE SIDE, AND THERE WILL ALSO BE CONTROLLED ACCESS AT THE LIGHT THAT IS CURRENTLY THERE ON EXECUTIVE AT MEYER AND THEN THE EXISTING LANE AND DRIVE SITE OF THE ROAD WILL ALSO BE USED AS PART OF THE VIP ENTRANCE. THE PARKING LOT CAPACITY -- THE PARKING RATIO IS VERY SIMILAR TO WHAT IS CONSTRUCTED AT THE ROSE MUSIC CENTER.

IT'S BASICALLY ONE SPACE PER EVERY THREE PATRONS.

IN THIS CASE, WE DESIGNED LOTS FOR CARS OR VEHICLES ALONG WITH ARFOR BANDS AND DROP-OFF AND PICKUP AND THINGS OF THAT NATURE.

THIS IS THE OPOSED SITE PLAN AND THE AERIAL VIEW JUST TO GIVE YOU A CONCEPT OF WHAT THIS COULD LOOK LIKE. WE ARE STILL WORKING OUT ALL OF THE TAILS AS FAR AS LANDSCAPING, BUT THIS IS PRETTY MUCH WHERE WE'VE LANDED ON THE SITE LAYOUT ITSELF. AS FAR AS THE BASIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN CHARACTERISTIC, THE SITE IS FLAT AND IT'S A VACANT PARCEL AR THE EXISTING ROSE MUSIC CENTER. THE DETAILS OF THIS VENUE ARE STILL UNDER DEVELOPMENT. SO THEREFORE THIS BASIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN IS SOMEWHAT VAGUE, BUT INTENDS TO ESTABLISH THE BROAD DEVELOPMENT PATTERNS SUCH AS ACCESS PARKING, SETBACKS AND BU PLACEMENT. WE HAVE SUBMITTED SITE PLANPLAN PACKAGE THAT ILLUSTRATES THE USE OF THE PA ET CETERA AND THE BUILDING ELEVATIONS AND MATERIEL SIGNAGE.

THOSE DETAILS ARE STILL BEING WORKED OUT BEFORE THE PLAN REVIEW STAGE IN THE FUTURE. AS FAR AS THE CONFORMANCE, THE DISTRICT REQUIREMENTS AND WE ARE PROPOSING THE FOLLOWING DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. THE PARKING SETBACKS ON THE WEST SAID WOULD BE FEET. ON THE NORTH, EAST SOUTH THEY WOULD BE TEN FEET. PARKING THE LANES SHOULD NOT BE CLOSER THAN 40 FEET TO ANY RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE.

WHILE THE BUILDING IS UNDER COUCTION ON THE WEST SIDE AS WELL AS AN EXISTING RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ON THE NORTH SIDE, AND THEN BUILDING SETBACKS WOULD BE 50 FEET FROM THE EXECUTIVE BOULEVARD. WHAT WE WE'RE CONCERNED ABOUT MAINLY IS MAKING SURE WE HAVE ADEQUATE SEPARATION OF THE PARKING LOTS FROM THE RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURES. THERE'S REALLY ONLY TWO THAT WE NEED TO BE CONCERNED ABOUT. ONE IS PAVIEW AND THEN ALSO THE DEVELOPMENT OF PRIDE 1 THAT'S BEING CONSTRUCTED ON THE WEST SIDE. SOTHAT IS WHY WE PROPOSED THESE SETBACKS. AS FAR AS PARKING AND LOADING STANDARDS, THE SITE PLAN ILLUSTRATES 1250 PARKING SPACES AND CODE WILL ACTUALLY ONLY WOULD REQUIRE 600 BECAUSE IT'S BASED ON FIXED SEATS, SO THERE ARE 1500 FIXED SEATS AND THEN THERE'S ROOM, STANDING ROOM ONLY FOR ABOUT ANOTHER 1500 PATRONS, BUT AS I MENTIONED WE DESIGNED LOT FOR A 3 1 RATIO WHICH IS CONSISTENT WITH THE ROSE

[00:25:02]

MUSIC CENTER. THE BUILDING IS ENVISIONED TO BE A MIX OF CONCRETE PANELS AND GLASS AND METAL ACCENT PANELS WHICH IS CONSISTENT WITH THE ZONING CODE.

LANDSCAPING, LIGHTING AND SIGNAGE HAVE NOT BEEN PROVIDED.

THOSE ARE STILL IN DESIGN, BUT THE DETAIL -- BUT THEY WILL BE REVIEWED DURING THE DETAILED DEVELOPMENT PLAN PHASE LIKE THE PREVIOUS APPLICANT.

AS FAR AS CONFORMANCE WITH THE GENERAL STANDARDS OF APPROVAL, LETTER A IS WHETHER OR NOT THE DEVELOPMENT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE OFFICIAL THOROUGH FARE PLAN AND THE COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT PLAN OR OTHER APPLICABLE PLANS AND IT'S STAFF OPINION THAT THE PROPOSAL IS CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND THE THOROUGH FARE PLAN. THE SITE IS LOCATED ON AN ARTERIOR STREET AND ACCESS WILL BE PROVIDED FROM ONE CENTRAL ACCESS FROM EXECUTIVE BOULEVARD.

THE SECOND BULLET IS WHETHER OR NOT THE DEVELOPMENT COULD BE COMPLETED WITHIN A SPECIFIED TIMEFRAME. WE HAVE NOT SPECIFIED THE TIMEFRAME YET, BUT SINCE THIS WOULD BE, YOU KNOW, A FACILITY THAT WE ATHE CITY WOULD BE DEEPLY INVOLVED IN, WE THINK WE WILL NOT MOVE FORWARD UNTIL THOSE DETAILS ARE WORKED OUT, BUT IF IT ALL MOVES FORWARD AS PLANNED CONSTRUCTION WOULD SLATE TO BEGIN IN EARLY '26.

ITEM C IS REALLY DEALING WITH ACCESSIBILITY FROM PUBLIC ROADS THAT ARE ADEQUATE TO CARRY THE TRAFFIC, THIS SECTION OF EXECUTIVE EXECUTIVE BOULEVARD. DURIWS WE WOULD ACTIVELY MANAGE THE TRAFFIC JUST LIKE WE DO WITH THE ROSE, SO IT WOULD NOT BE PASSIVE.

IT WOULD BE ACTIVELY CONTROLLED JUST LIKE THE ROSE HAS DONE. GENERAL STANDARD, D IS WHETHER THE PROJECT SHALL NOT IMPOSE AN UNDUE BURDEN ON POLICE, FIRE AND SCHOOLS. STAFF DOESN'T CIPATE ANY BURDEN ON PUBLIC SERVICES. THE SITE HAS ADEQUATE UTILITY AND STREET CAPACITY. UNAWARE OF ANY POLICING CONCERNS AT THE ROSE. WE DON'T THINK THIS FACILITY WOULD PROVIDE ANY ISSUES EITHER. THE DEVELOPMENT WILL COMPLY WITH ALL BUILDING AND FIRE CODE REQUIREMENTS. LASTLY OF SORT OF RELEVANCE, ITEM K IS THAT THE USE SHALL NOT INVOLVE USES, ACTIVITIES, PROCESSES, EQUIPMENT, ET CETERA THAT ARE CONTRARY TO THE GENERAL WELFARE OR WOULD -- WOULD CAUSE EXCESSIVE PRODUCTION OF TRAFFIC, NOISE, SMOKE, FUMES, GLARE OR ODORS. ALL PROPOSED USES THAT ARE BEING CONSIDERED, BOTH THE MUSIC CENTER AND ALSO A CONFERENCE FACILITY WITHIN THIS FACILITY ARE CONSISTENT WITH THE PLANNED MIXED- USE DISTRICT. WE DON'T ANTICIPATE EXCESSIVE NOISE, GLARE OR ODORS. ALL ARE INDOORS. ADDITIONALLY, AS I SAID, ANY TRAFFIC THAT WOULD BE CREATED ON EXECUTIVE BOULEVARD WOULD BE PROACTIVELY MANAGED BY OUR POLICE DEPARTMENT AS IS THE CASE TODAY WITH THE ROSE.

IT'S STAFF RECOMMENDATION OR STAFF OPINION, EXCUSE ME, THAT THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 1171-06 CAN BE MET AND WE RECOMMEND APPROVAL WITH THOSE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS THAT THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, ONE OF THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS THAT THE PARKING SETBACK ON THE WEST SIDE BE 25 FEET.

ON THE NORTHEAST AND SOUTH IT WOULD BE TEN FEET AND ANY PARKING, PAVEMENT AND TRAVEL LANES SHOULD BE NO CLOSER THAN 40 FEET FROM ANY RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE AND LASTLY, THAT THE BUILDING SETBACK WOULD BE 50 FEET FROM EXECUTIVE BOULEVARD.

SECOND DEVELOPMENT -- SECOND CONDITION IS THAT THE SITE ACCESS PLAN SHALL BE GENERALLY SIMILAR TO THE SITE PLAN LABELED RENDERED SITE PLAN DATED SEPTEMBE 2025, WHICH THIS. THE PLANNING COMMISSION, WAS THERE DISCUSSION AT THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING ABOUT EXECUTIVE BOULEVARD AND TRAFFIC AND HOW WE WOULD MANAGE THAT WHICH IS, AS MENTIONED, WE WOULD BE PROACTIVELY MANAGING ANY TRAFFIC DURING E CONCERT NIGHTS.

OTHERWISE, WAS THERE NO OPPOSITION AND THE PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENDED APPROVAL -- RECOMMENDED APPROVAL OF THE SPACE AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN.

>> THANK YOU, AARON. IS THERE ANY OTHER REPRESENTATIVES FROM THE WOULD HAVE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION?

>> OKAY. NEXT I CALL ON THE LAW

[00:30:02]

DIRECTOR TO PROVIDE ANY COMMENTS OR PROVIDE ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION?

>> NOT TONIGHT.

>> OKAY. IS THERE ANYONE HERE TONIGHT THAT WOULD CHOOSE TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF THIS ISSUE? IS THERE ANYONE PRESENT WHO WOULD WISH TO SPEAK AGAINST THE APPROVAL OE ISSUE?

>> THANK YOU, COUNCIL. I APPRECIATE IT.

TOM M CMASTERS, RT THAT CAUGHT MY ATTENTION IN YOUR PRESENTATION WAS THE POLICE AND FIRE AND WHETHER IT WOULD HAVE ANY NEGATIVE IMPACT ON THAT. I KNOW THAT A LOT OF THE RESIDENTS RIGHT NOW FEEL THAT WE COULD HAVE A BIGGER AND FIRE PRESENCE IN OUR NEIGHBORHOODS, AND SO I KNOWTHAT THE ROSE TOOK A T OF RESOURCES, POLICE AND FIRE WISE -- AT LEAST POLICE WISE SO I WOULD HAVE LIKED TO HAVE HEARD IN THAT PRESENTATION JUST HOW MUCH EXTRA TIME WOULD HAVE NEEDED FROM POLICE AND FIRE, AND IF THERE WAS A PLANTO INCREASE OUR POLICE FORCE IN ORDER TO BE ABLE TO HANDLE THES CONCERTS, BUT THTHING THAT ACTUALLY I WAS GOING TO TALK ABOUT PRIOR TO ING TO YOUR PRESENTATION WAS I HAD A HARD TIME -- IN FACT, I WASN'T ABLE TO -- I DIDN'T HAVE AN EASY TIME IT AT ALL, FIND A ESENTATION ONE ON THE FEASIBILITY OF AN INDOOR MUSIC CENTER. I KNOW WE HAD ONE DONE FOR THE ROSE AND BEOF IC COMP. THE PUBLIC WAS ABLE TO READ THAT PRIOR TO THE ROSE OPENING THAT WE WERE ABLE TO MAKE SOME CHANGES AND ADJUSTMENTS TO THE PLANNED USAGE OF THAT THAT HELPED MAKE THE ROSE A SUCCESSFUL, ATING ONE. INDEPENDENT SO BEFORE I WOULD STOP SPENDING MONEY I HAVE A FEASIBILITY STUDY THAT TOLD US HOW WE PLAN TO USE THE FACILITY AND HOW MUCH WE EXPECT THAT THE ES WOULD BE, HOW WE EXPECTED TO FUND IT. ALL THOSE THINGS, I WOULD THINK THAT WE WOULD HAVE AVAILABLE, AND IF THEY ARE AVAILABLE THEN THEY SHOULD BE EASILY FOR RESIDENTS TO FIND BASIC SEARCHES ON THE CITY WEBSITE.

SO IT'S THE CART BEFORE THE HORSE TYPE OF QUESTION NOW.

OBSLY, WE CAN IMPROVE THE THING T HERE, BUT BEFORE I SPENT ANY MONEY ON IT, AND I WOULDN'T THINK THAT COUNCIL WOULD HIKE TO KNOW HOW MUCH WE'RE GOING TO MAKE AND HOW FUNNY IT WOULD COST. I KNOWTHAT COUNCIL KNOWS THAT I DON'T THE ROSE IS BEING PAID OUT OF TIF FUNDS BECAUSE TIF FUNDS ARE DESIGNATED FOR INFRASTRUCTURE.

IF YOU LOOK AT WHAT INFRASTRUCTURE IS DEFINED AS IN THE ORC, MUSIC CENTERS AREN'T PART OF THAT ALTHOUGH YOU CAN MAKE YOUR WAY AROUND TO MAKE IT LOOK LIKE THAT, BUT INFRASTRUCTURE ARE ROAD, SEWERS, THOSE KINDS OF THING, AND WE HAVE SEWER PROJECTS.

WE HAVE WATER PROJECTS. OUR CITY WIDE WATER SOFTENING PROJECT AND THE HIGH PRESSURE WATER PROJECT IN THAT ZONE THAT COULD BE PAID FOR USING THE TIF THERE ARES THOME FROM THAT AREA.

SO TO ME, I WOULD LIKE THOSE TIF DOLLARS TO PAY FOR THOSE FUNDS TO KEMY WATER BILLOWER INSTEAD OF IT GOING -- IF I WOULD GO TO THE ROSE I WOULD PAY THE EXTRA DOLLAR.

>> TOM, YOU'RE STARTING TO GET OFF ON SOMETHING OTHER THAN WHY YOU'D BE SPECIFICALLY AGAINST THIS.

>> YES. I'M TALKING ABOUT TIF FUNDS AND HOW THEY'RE USED AND WHAT THE FUNDING FOR THIS WOULD BE, AND I EXPECT THAT IT WOULD BE A TIF FUNDED. SO BEFORE WE WENT AHEAD AND TIF FUNDS OR ADDITIONAL DEVELOPMENT, CITIZENS OF SHOULD WHAT THEY CAN GET INSTEAD WHICH INCLUDES TRAF RELIEF ON OLD TROY AND THE WHOLE AREA, AS WELL. SO AGAIN, THE BASIC POINT IS THE RT THE HORSE AND THE FUNDING COULD BE USED FOR OTHER PROJECTS THAT WOULD BENEFIT THE RESIDENTS BETTER. THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

>> THANK YOU. NEXT CALLING ON

[00:35:02]

SOMEONE FROM CITY COUNCIL WHO WISHES TO HAVE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. SCOTT?

>> CAN I GET JOHN OR AARON TO EXPLAIN THE NCA WILL DO ALL OF THE FEIGNANCING AND THE NEWNEW MUSIC VENUE? E HAVE SET UP AN NCA THAT COVERS EXECUTULEVARD AND OTHER AREAS OF THE CITY IN ORDER TO PROVIDE A REVENUE STREAM, A PARTIAL REVENUE STREAM TO FINANCE THIS DEVELOPMENT IF WE DECIDE TO MOVE FORWARD.

SO WHAT WHAVE DONE IS WE HAVE SET THE TABLE, THE PLACE SETTINGS FOR THE NCA. WE HAVE NOT MOVED FORWARD WITH ANY OF THE SORT OF BACK END DOCUMENTATIONS OR SETTING FEES. THE BOARD HAS NOT MET. THE CONCEPT OF THE NCA WOULD BE A SERIES OF YOU CAN CALL THEM USER FEES THAT ARE PAID FOR BY THE INDIVIDUALS WHO UTILIZE THESE RVICES ON EXECUTIVE BOULEVARD WHETHER BE AN ADDITIONAL TEL/MOTEL BACKS. IT COULD BE TICKET -- ADDITIONAL PARKING REVENUE. IT COULD BE A FOOD AND BEVERAGE CHARGE. THERE ARE THE NCA LEGISLATION SETS UP A SORT OF RNUCOPIA OF OPTIONS THAT THE NC COULD CHOOSE TO UNDERTAKE IN ORDER TO GENERATE SOME OF THE REVENUE STREAM THAT WOULD FUND THE LONG- TERM CONSTRUCTION OF FINANCING OF THIS FACILI ADDITION TO JUST GENERAL TICKET REVENUE AND OTHER SAES WOULD BE AS A RESULT OF THE VERY SHOWS.

>> AND THAT WOULD BEBE PLACE, BEFORE WE STARGOING, ACTUALLY, THOSE BUILDING BLOCKS ARE ALREADY IN PLACE. THIS COUNCIL VOTED A MONTH AGO TO APPOINT MEMBERS TO THE NCA BOARD.

WE ARE WAITING FOR THE DEVELOPER, THE OTHER DEVELOPER TO APPOINT THE REPRESENTATION AND THEN WE WOULD ANTICIPATE HAVING THAT BOARD MEETING, BUT LIKE I SAID, WE'VE PUT ALL OF THE PLACE SETTINGS ON THE TABLE, BUT WE HAVE NOT YET SERVED

THEM. >> AND NCA IS TOTALLY DIFFERENT THAN THE TIF?

>> IT IS.

IT IS. THE NCA IS EFFECTIVELY A USER CHARGE. A MECHANISM FOR USER

CHARGES. >> THANK YOU. THANKS FOR CLARIFYING. THANKS, MAYOR.

>> THANK YOU, SCOTT.

NANCY? >> AARON, I KNOW THAT THIS BUILDING WILL BE ABLE TO BE -- LL ALLOW FOR LTIPLE CONFIGURATIONS INSIDE TO HOST DIFFERENT, VENTS. YOU HAVE IN THERE THAT THERE ARE -- I CAN'T REMEMBER WHAT THE NUMBER WAS, ABOUT 1300 FIXED

SEATS? >> THERE ARE ABOUT 1500 FIXED SEATS AND THEN THE FLOOR AREA HAS SPACE FOR ANOTHER 1500 EITHER SEATED PATRONS OR STANDING, AND THEN IT'S ALSO ABLE TO BE CONFIGURED FOR A CONFERENCE FACILITY R SEATING FOR T 350 TO 400 PEOPLE DEPENDING ON THE SIZE OF THE TABLES.

? SO IF WE HAD SOME KIND OF A COMMUNITY, VENT THIS WHICH WOULD OPEN UP AS MUCH AS WE COULD, WHAT DO YOU THINK THE MAXIMUM CAPACITY WOULD BE?

>> WELL, AT THE MINIMUM, THE MAXIMUM CAPACITY WOULD BE ROUGHLY 3500 INDIVIDUALS DEPENDING ON HOW IT'S CONFIGURED. THERE -- THERE WOUL POSSIBLY BE ADDITIONAL ROOM FOR OVERFLOW, STANDING ROOM ONLY TYPE OF

THINGS. >> LIKE IF WE WANTED TO DO A HOLIDAY CRAFT FAIR OR SOMETHING.

>> OH, THE CRAFT FAIR IS KIND OF UNLIMITED. WE HAVEAMPLE FLOOR SPACE TO PUT 50, 60 TABLES WITHOUT REALLY BLINKING

AN EYE. >> GOOD.

GOOD. THANK YOU.

IT EASILY WOULD HANDLE THAT IF YOU WANTED TO BRING A CONFERENCE INTO THE CITY OR SOMETHING?

>> YEAH. WHEN WE WERE HAVING CONVERSATIONS ABOUT THIS ONE OF THE ISSUES THAT WE HEARD FROM HOTEL OPERATORS AND OTHER BUSINESSES WAS THE LACK OF EVENT SPACE, INDOOR EVENT SPACE IN THE COMMUNITY. SO THAT'S WHY FROM REALLY THE BEGINNING WE STARTED WANTING TO

[00:40:03]

DEVELOP A BUILDINGTHAT HAS SOME MORE FLEXIBLE USES FOR THOSE TIMES WHEN CONCERTS AREN'T BEING PROGRAMMED. SO THE IDEA IS TO USE THIS TO ITS MAXIMUM POTENTIAL.

>> GREAT.

THANK YOU. >> ANITA?

>> I'M NOT SURE WHAT THE ANSWER IS -- OKAY, IF IT'S STARTING TO GET CROWDED ON EXECUTIVE AND SEE WE NEED THE ROAD WIDENED, WOULD IT BE POSSIBLE AT THE NORTH END TO TAKE A ROAD DIRECT TO GRAND

PIKE? >> THAT'S ALWAYS BEEN MY CONCERN THE CONSECUTIVE BEING TOO CROWDED. I'M JUST LOOKING AT OTHER

OPTIONS. >> YEAH.

THERE ARE OPTIONS -- SO THERE'S RIGHT OF WAY AVAILABLE AT LEAST ON THIS SECTION OF EXECUTIVE BOULEVARD. THERE'S RIGHT OF WAY AVAILABLE TO WIDEN EXECUTIVE ON THE SOUTH SIDE. SO THERE IS -- THERE IS ROOM THERE.

THERE IS ALSO THE ABILITY IT COULD BRING ANOTHER ROAD OUT ON TO BRANT ALONG THE SOUTH EDGE OF PARK VIEW.

YOU COULD ALSO PUSH LAYMAN OF THE WAY TO DEPUTY SHAW AT SOME PO THAT WAS THE ORIGINAL IDEA AT SOME POINT IN TIME. THERE WERE SOME RELIEF OPTIONS IF THIS BECOMES -- IF TRAFFIC BECOMES

AN ISSUE. >> OKAY.

>> THANK YOU. ANYONE ELSE?

>> KATE?

>> THANK YOU, MAYOR. AARON, THANK YOU FOR THE PRESENTATION. I APPRECIATE IT. MY QUESTION IS ON LAYMAN LANE.

IS THERE SOME WAY THAT WE'LL PROTECT THE RESIDENTS FROM PEOPLE TRYING TO PARK BACK IN THEIR APARTMENTS AND CAN YOU SPEAK TO THAT, PLEASE?

>> YES. SO WHAT WE ARE -- THE CURRENT THINKING IS THAT WE WOULD HAVE AN ACTIVE BOLLARD SYSTEM THATTHAT WOULD ERECT DURING CONCERTS TO BASICALLY KEEP PATRONS FROM BOTHERING THE RES DENTSS AND VICE VERSA. AGS PART OF THE ACTIVE TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT THAT WOULD BE DURING THE EVENT, BUT WE DO NEED TO KEEP LAYMAN OPEN FROM BUYER ACCESS TO

PARK VIEW. >> I WAS THINKING IT WOULD GO DOWN.

>> MOREWOULD COME UP. PEOPLE DRIVE THROUGH GATES.

>> I WOULDN'T KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT THAT. THANK YOU, MAYOR.

>> SCOTT?

>> ALSO FROM MISS KITCHEN, I THOUGHT YOU WOULD CHANGE THE TRAFFIC LIGHT TIMES AND EVERYTHING LIKE THAT. FOR CONCERTS GETTING OUT THAT WOULD HELP TO GET THEM OUT.

>> THANK YOU. AARON, TO ADDRESS THE CAN ENTS MADE BY MR. MCMASTER, YOU GIVE AN OVERVIEW OF WHAT I'LL CALL STAFF'S FEASIBILITY FINDINGS? IN OTHER WORDS, I KNOW WE'VE GOTTEN INFORMATION FROM MIMI, THE CURRENT PROVIDER WITH REGARD TO INCOME PROJECTIONS AND THINGS LIKE THAT. CAN YOU GIVE ME SOMETHING BRIEFLY ON THAT?

>> YEAH. SO WE'VE BEEN WALKING HAND IN HAND WITH MIMI AS PART OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF THIS BECAUSE THEY ARE THE EXPERTS IN THE OPPOSITION OF BOTH OUTDOOR AND INDOOR MUSIC VENUES, SO THEY HAVE PROVIDED HIGH- LEVEL PROJECTIONS AS FAR AS THE NUMBER OF CONCERTS, REVENUE, OPERATING EXPENDITURES, ET CETERA. THE ITECT OF RECORD IS AN ACCIDENT PERT IN VENUES OF IS NATURE. SO THEY HAVE ALSO BEEN HELPING GUIDE US THROUGH THIS PROCESS AS FAR AS WHERE TO CUT COSTS AND WHERE TO MAKE SURE YOU'RE NOT SKIMPING ON FUNDS IN ORDER TO SORT OF HAVE THE BEST POSSIBLE PATRON EXPERIENCE.

BEFORE WE MOVE FORWARD ON REALLY PULLING THE -- PULLING THE TRIGGER, SO TO SPEAK, FOR FINANCING, WE WILL NEED TO UNDERTAKE A THIRD- PARTY REVIEW OF MIMI'S INSTIMATES TO MAKE SURE THAT OUR THIRD PARTY ESTIMATOR AGREES TH THEM. THINKING IN THE FUTURE ABOUT HOW THIS WOULD BE FINANCED, ANY BOND BUYER OR INVESTOR WOULD HAVE TOTO UNDERGO AN EXAMINATION FOR THE INCOME RO JEKZS AND THAT IS IN THE WORKS.

>> THANK YOU. THANK YOOR.

>> THANK YOU, DON. ANYONE ELSE?

YES, MARK? >> AARON, LET'S TALK ABOUT THE FEASIBILITY STUDY THAT YOU AND I HAVE SPOKEN TO IN THE LAST FEW WEEKS.

BUT BEFORE WE DO, CAN YOU EXPLAIN WHAT THIS AGENDA ITEM IS AND WHAT YOU'RE ASKING FOR PERTAINING TO THIS AGENDA

[00:45:03]

ITEM?

>> YES. SO ALL WE ARE DOING FOR THIS AGENDA ITEM IS SETTING THE BROAD PARAMETERS OF THE SITE PLAN ESTABLISHING THE USES OF PERMITTED USE, ESTABLISHING THE DEVELOPMENT CONSTRAINTS AS FAR AS SETBACK, ACCESS, BUILDING PLACEMENT, ET CETERA.

'S REALEE ALL THAT IS BEING DECIDED TONIGHT.

>> AND THEN WHEN WE GET TO ITEM N, WHERE WE'RE GOING TO APPROVE A BASIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE 18 ACRES, AND WE'RE GOING TO T THAT OR NOT, BUT IF IT IS ADOPTED WHAT DOES THAT OBLIGATE

US? >> THAT OBLIGATES US TO NOTHING.

IT JUST ALLOWS US TO MOVE FORWARD IN THE NEXT PHASE OF DESIGN IF WE CHOOSE TO MOVE FORWARD. THE ARCHITECTS NOW HAVE THE SITE PLAN PARAMETERS OF HOW THE BOX WILL FIT WITHIN THE BOX.

>> AND WHEN WE TALKED, YOU, JOHN AND I TALKED ABOUT THE FEASIBILITY STUDY AND IT WAS YOUR OPINION THAT WE NEEDED TO GET AT LEAST THIS FAR.

>> CORRECT.

>> BEFORE WE HAD SOMETHING TO MAKE FEASIBLE AS ITES TO WHAT IT IS WE'RE BUILDING.

>> I DIDN'T PROVIDE ALL OF THE RENDERINGS THAT WE HAVE BECAUSE THAT'S REALLY NOT GERMANE TO THIS PARTICULAR CONVERSATION. YES, WE HAD TO DO THE SPACE UDY ON SEATING, UT, STAGE SIDES, ET CETERA AND WE ARE THROUGH SCHEMATIC DESIGN AND NOW IT'S POINTED US TO -- WHETHER OR NOT WE MOVE FORWARD, THE FEASIBILITY STUDY WILL BE BASED ON THAT SCHEMATIC DESIGN THAT WE REALLY JUST WRAPPED UP LAST THURSDAY AS FAR AS GETTING ALL OF THE PARTIES TO AGREE THAT THIS IS THE PROGRAMMING AND THIS IS THE SIZE, THIS IS THE LAYOUT, ET CETERA.

>> SO YOU NEEDED TO DECIDE HOW HOW MANY SEATS, WHAT THE BUILDING WAS GOING TO LOOK LIKE, WHAT IT MIGHT BE USED FOR?

>> >> AMENITIES, THAT'S CORRECT.

>> HAVE YOU BEEN TALKING TO A

COMPANY. >> WILL PERFORM THAT

FEASIBILITY? >> YEAH.

WE HAVE A CALL ON WEDNESDAY

AFTERNOON. >> SO

ALL OF THAT'S -- >> IN MOTION.

>> AND IN THE RIGHT ORDER.

>> CORRECT.

>> JUST SO I'M UP TO SPEED ON AN NCA, WE HAVE INSTRUMENTS LIKE

CRAS. >>

UH-HUH. >> WE HAVE AGREEMENTS THAT IS PENDING WITH BETHEL TOWNSHIP. WE -- WE ARE GOING TO IMPLEMENT NCAS AND WE'RE GOING TO USE TIFS ON THIS PROJECT?

>> YES. WE ARE GOING TO USE ALL OF THE QUIVERS, AND ALL OF THE AREAS IN OUR QUIVER TO MAKE THIS HAPPEN, BUT YES. THE FINANCIAL PLAN IS TO USE A COMBINATION MAINLY NCA, SOME TIF AND THEN JUST TRADITIONAL DEBT FINANCING BASED ON REVENUE STREAMS.

>> AND JOHN, YOU'RE PRETTY FAMILIAR WITH WHAT WE DID TEN YEARS AGO.

>> YSZ.NZ.

>> AND WHAT WE ARE PROPOSING NOWNOW WITH THE ROSE MUSIC CENTER.

>> WE TALKED HAND ININ WITH MIMI DURING THE PROCESS AND SHE WAS THE CATALYST LOOKING AT SOMETHING LIKE THIS AND THEIR PROJECTIONS, INITIAL HIGH- LEVEL PROJECTIONS ARE THAT WE'RE GOING TO BE PROBABLY A LITTLE BIT BETTER OFF AS WE WALK THROUGH THAT AT THE CURRENT MUSIC CENTER.

THAT E NCA, I THINK, YEAH, I HAVE NO PROBLEMS MOVING FORWARD.

>> AND ONE THING THAT WE'VE TALKED ABOUT AS A COUNCIL IS MAYBE USING SOME OF THE PROFITS FROM THIS TO HELP SATISFY DEBT SERVICE.

>> CORRECT. >> TO RELIEF SOME DEBT.

>> OUR RECOMMENDATION IS THAT YOU USE THE ENTIRE --

>> OKAY. SO WE'RE BUILDING AN EVEN STRONGER MODEL THAN WE DID AT THE ROSE MUSIC CENTER.

THAT'S BEEN VERY SUCCESSFUL.

>> THE INITIAL NUMBERS ARE -- YEAH, MORE SUCCESSFUL THAN WHAT THE CURRENT ROSE IS.

>> OKAY. IN TALKING ABOUT THAT, HAVE YOU FOLKS TALKED ABOUT WHAT EFFECT THAT WOULD HAVE ON THE ROSE, IF ANY, POSITIVE OR NEGATIVE?

>> THEY'RE COMPLIMENTARY IN TALKING WITH MIMI BECAUSE THERE ARE DIFFERENT ACTS THAT WOULD BE -- THEY ARE COMPLIMENTARY IN THE SENSE THAT THE ACTS DON'T COMPETE AGAINST EACH OTHER.

THERE ARE A NUMBER OF ENTERTAINERS AND BANDS THAT DON'T WANT TO PLAY IN AN OPEN-AIF I THEET ARE.

THEIR SMALLER THAN THE ROSE CENTER AS FAR AS SEATING XAPT,

[00:50:05]

SO WE HAVE YEAR- ROUND OPPORTUNITIES THERE, BUT IF YOU LOOK AT THEIR SUCCESS BETWEEN RIVERBEND, BRADY, TAFT, THOSE VENUES DON'T COMPETE AGAINST EACH OTHER. THEY DO A GOOD JOB TO ALIGN THE RIGHT BAND AT E RIGHT VENUE AT THE RIGHT TIME AND WE HAVE EVERY EXPECTATION THAT THAT WILL OCCUR HERE, TOO.

>> WE WILL FOLLOW THE LAW TO THE LETTER AND OUR TAXPAYERS WON'T PAY ONE DIME EXTRA AND WE'LL BUILD THIS VERY SIMILAR TO HOW WE DID THE ROSE MUSIC CENTER.

>> CORRECT.

>> AND PROPERTY TAXES THAT WOULD HAVE BEEN SENT TO MONTGOMERY COUNTY AND NOT EVER SENT BACK US TO MIGHT HAVE BEEN SPENT DOWN AT AUSTIN LANDING HAS COME BACK AND PAID -- IS PAYING FOR THE ROSE, AND TICKET SALE PROFITS, IF YOU'RE ABLE TO PUT INTO THE GENERAL FUND.

>> YES. >> AND YOU CELEBRATED YOUR TENTH ANNIVERSARY ON THE ROSE

RECENTLY. >> ES, SIR.

>> WE'VE MADE THEIR 10 MILLION IN THE GENERAL FUND.

AND YOU'VE SPEND A LOT OF THAT IN OUR

PARKS. >> THE MAJORITY.

>> OKAY. WEPLAN ON BEING AS SUCCESSFUL HERE.

>> ABSOLUTELY. >> OKAY.

>> THAT'S ALL I HAVE.

>> DOES ANYONE HAVE ANYTHING ELSE?

YES, DON? >> I'M SORRY.

AARON, I JUST WANT TO GO BACK TO THE SITE PLAN HERE AGAIN. THE 40- FOOT BUFFER BETWEEN RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURES AND THE TRAFFIC.

>> PAVEMENT. YEAH. AT THE POINT WHERE THIS GOES IN, WITH THE DETAILED PLAN, ANIRED BUFFERING THAT MIGHT NEED TO TAKE PLACE AS FAR AS LIGHTING?

>> YEAH. ABSOLUTELY. INFACT, THE REASON I PUT TOGETHER THAT BUFFERING DISTANCE WAS TO MAKE SURE THAT SETBACK DISTANCE WAS TO MAKE SURE THAT WE HAD ADEQUATE SPACE FOR ADEQUATE SCREENING AND BUFFERING, PARTICULARLY WHEN YOU LOOK AT THE SITE PLAN OF PLOT 1. ALL OF THE UNITS ON THE EAST SIDE OF PRIDE 1 ARE ON THE LEFT SIDE OF THIS SITE AND THEIR BACK PORCHES ALL LOOK ON THE PARKING LOT, AND SO THE LAST THING THAT I WANTED, TH TO MYSELF AS RESIDENT, I DON'T WANT TO SEE HEADLIGHTS, AND I DON'T WANT TO BE HAVI FOLKS, AS MUCH AS WE CAN, NEXT TO A 3500- SEAT FACILITY, BUT WE WANTED TO MAKE SURE THAT WE WERE BASICALLY LOOKING OUT FOR THE RESIDENTS' INTEREST, AS WELL.

SO THAT'S WHY THAT 40- FOOT BUFFER OR SETBACK IS THERE.

>> AND JUST TO FOLLOW UP, I NOTICED WHEN U TALKED ABOUT T PROPERTIES, ONE OF THEM IS AGRICULTURAL.

WHICH PARCEL IS AGRICULTF THE TOP OF YOUR HEAD?

>> SO ALL OF THE -- I DON'T WANT TO SAY ALL, THE VAST MAJORITY OF THE LOTS ON THE NORTH THAT TOUCHED THE NORTH PROPERTY LINE ARE FIVE ACRE TOWNSHIP LOTS AND ALMOST ALL OF THOSE WERE ZONED IN AGRICULTURE.

>> THANKS, MAYOR.

>> EXCUSE ME, DOES ANYONE HAVE ANYTHING ELS

>> ONE LAST TIME, IS THERE ANYONE PRESENT WHO WISHES TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF OR AGAINST THE PROVAL OF THIS ISSUE?

>> I DO HAVE TO THANK MR. CAMPBELL FOR TING OUT THE FACT THAT TIFS ARE PLANNED TO BE USED HERE, AS WELL.

I'M SORRY. I HAVE A HARD TI FINDING THINGS ON MY PHONE AND I CAN'T READ EXACTLY WHERE IT WAS, BUT ONE OF THE DOCUMENTATIONS THAT YOU PRESENT FOR THE NCA, ITNTIONS FEES AND STUFF LIKE THAT AND ALSO TIF. SO I THINK IT'S IMPORTANT FOR COUNCIL TO REALIZE THAT TIF IS PROBABLY GOING TO BE A LARGE PART OF THE FUNDING BECAUSE IT'S HARD TO IMAGINE THAT YOU'LL GET RESTAURANTS CHARGING ENOUGH AND EXTRA FEES IN ORDER TO PAY FOR A VENUE OF THIS SIZE. SO I DO THANK YOU ON THAT.

I WILL POINT OUT,THOUGH, THAT YES, IF THE ROSE IS MAKING AS MUCH MONAS PRESENTED HERE.

A LOT OF THE CONSTRUCTION COSTS COULD BE OFFSET OR AS MR. CAMPBELL SAYS BECAUSE WE DIDN'T DO WE PUT IT IN THE GENERAL FUND AND THEN YOU HAVE LOT MORE ACES TO USE THAT MONEY SO IT MIGHT BE A WASH IF WE'RE MAKING THIS MUCH MONEY AS PRESENTED SOMETIMES, BUT I WILL POINT OUT THAT THE PRESENTATION OF THE ROSE'S

[00:55:03]

FINANCIALS UP UNTIL 2018 HAD ALL THE BACKGROUND INFORMATION TO KNOW THAT WHEN WE SAID WE MADE $700,000 PEOPLE CAN LOOK AND THEN CHALLENGE IF WE WERE MISSING SOMETHING OR NOT MISSING SOMETHING FROM 2018. I SAW A FIVE- PAGE SUMMARY, BUT NOTHING IN THE BACKGROUND, AND I HAVEN'T BEEN ABLE TO FIND ANYTHING IN WRITING WITH THE ROSE'S FINANCIALS.

>> TOM, I'LL REMIND YOU AGAIN, THIS IS ABOUT THE APPROVAL OF THIS SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND NOT THE ROSE FINANCING AND THE OTHER THINGS.

THIS IS TO GIVE YOU THE OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OR

AGAINST. >> I'M ADDRESSING THE STUFF COUNCIL HAD ALREADY DRESS OKAY.

>> YOU UNDERSTAND, I'M LETTING YOU KNOW, THIS IS YOUR OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK AGAINST OR FOR THE APPROVAL OF THIS SPECIFIC AGENDA WHICH ALSO MR. CAMPBELL CLARIFIED WHAT THIS SPECIFIC AGENDA ITEM WAS ABOUT.

>> WHICH IS E APPROVAL OF THE S

>> OKAY. ALL RIGHT.

THANK YOU.

>> THANK YOU.

>> ANYONE ELSE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK FOR OR AGAINST THIS ISSUE? OKAY. THE PUBLIC HEARING BY THE CITY COUNCIL FOR CASE BDP 25 HEREBY CLOSED.

[ A Public Hearing Scheduled For November 10, 2025 By The Huber Heights City Council For Case MC 25-25. The Applicant Is Simms Development. The Applicant Is Requesting Approval Of A Major Change To The Basic Development Plan To Increase the Density From 74 Units To 91 Total Units For Property Located At Gable Way And State Route 235 And Further Described As Parcel Number P70 03910 0088 On The Montgomery County Auditor's Map.]

>> NEXT WE HAVE ITEM 11L.

>> A PUBLIC HEARING SCHEDULED FOR NOVEMBER 10, 2025, BY THE HUBER HEIGHTS CITY COUNCIL FOR CASE BDP 25- 25, THE APPLICANT IS SIMS DEVELOPMENT.

THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING APPROVAL OF A MAJOR CHANGE TO THE BASIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO INCREASE THE DENSITY FROM 74 UNITS TO 91 TOTAL UNITS FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT GABLE WAY AND STATE ROUTE 235 FURTHER DESCRIBED AS PARCEL NUMBER P70-03910- 0088 ON THE MONTGOMERY COUNTY AUDITOR'S MAP.

>> THE PUBLIC HEARING SCHEDULED FOR NOVEMBER 10, 2025, BY THE HUBER HEIGHTS CITY COUNCIL FOR MC 25- 25IS NOW OPEN, AND I WOULD CALL ON STAFF TO MAKE THEIR INITIAL

PRESENTATION. >> I CAN CLARIFY SOMETHING REALLY QUICK?

>> YES. >> IN YOUR PACKET IT SAYS GABLE WAY AND STATE ROUTE 201. IT'S MC 25- 25, AS WELL. SO --

>> DID I NOT SAY MC?

>> YOU SAID BDP. I WANT TO CLARIFY FOR PEOPLE SO THEY KNOW WHAT'S GOING ON SORRY.

>> OKAY. AARON?

YES. AS WAS STATED, THIS IS A MAJOR CHANGE REQUEST TO THE BASIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO INCREASE THE ITY FROM 74 U TO 91 TOTAL UNITS. THORIGINAL BASIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN WAS INITIALLY APPROVED IN S THE AREA IN QUESTION.

THERE ARE FIVE BUILDING SITES REMAINING. WHAT THE APPLICANT IS ESSENTIALLY DOING IS REDUCING THE TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EACH INDIVIDUAL UNIT SO THE BUILDING FOOTPRINT STAYS THE SAME. THE I A LITTLE BIT SMALLER. THEY GET A LITTLE BIT TALLER SO THE UNIT COUNT GOES UP, BUT THE ACTUAL FOOTPRINT OF THE STRUCTURE AND THE TOWNHOUSES, IT STAYS THE SAME. SO THIS IS THE PROPOSED SITE PLAN. THERE ARE FIVE BUILDINGS WHICH IS A LITTLE BIT DIFFICULT TO SEE ON THIS RENDERING OR ON THIS SITE PLAN. WHILE THE NUMBER OF UNITS GOES UP, THE ACTUAL SETBACK OR DISTANCE BETWEEN THE CTURE AND THE PROPERTY LINE ACTUALLY INCREASES BECAUSE THE BUILDING IS GETTING NARROWER, BUT TALLER.

SO WE'RE ACTUALLY INCREASING THE BUFFERING ABILITY OR THE SETBACK FROM THE STRUCTURES TO THE EXISTING RESIDENTS TO THE NORTH.

TO THE EAST IS REALLY LARGELY JUSTA NICELY LANDSCAPED DRAINAGE SOIL OR TO THE WEST, I'M SORRY. SO THESE ARE THE ORIGINAL AND THESE ARE THE TOWNHOME THOOS HAVE BEEN CONSTRUCTED AND THIS IS THE RENDERING OF WHAT WAS PROPOSED IN 2022.

THERE HAVE BEEN A NUMBER OF THESE THAT HAVBEEN CONSTRUCTED AND THE APPLICANIS REQUESTING THE PERMISSION AND SLIGHTLY SMALLER, T THE TYPE OF UNITS THAT SIMS HAS BEEN

[01:00:02]

CREATINGCREATING THROUGHOUT THE REGION, THEY ARE SLIGHTLY TALLER SO THE ORIGINAL BUILDING WAS 33 FEET. E PROPOSED FEET IS 39 1/2, GIVE OR TAKE, SO THEY'RE CALLY ADDING MY HEIGHT TO ONE OF THE BUILDINGS OR TWO OF THE BUILDINGS. SO AS I MENTIOTHE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING TO REPLACE TWO FIVE- STORY BUILDINGS. THEY'RE TALLER, BUT THEY'RE FUFROM THE PROPERTY LINE.

THE PARKING RATIO REMAINS THE SAME. ONE OTHER THING TO MENTION IS PRIOR TO THE BASIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL IN MARCH' 22, THEY WERE TO UNITS AND NOW THEY'RE ASKING TO GO BACK UP 91. STAFF RECOMMEND APPROVAL AND THE PLANNING COMMISSION VOTED TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THIS MAJOR CHANGE.

THE ZONING CODE STATES AND THE ONLY REASON WE'RE HERE IS THAT THE ZONING CODE REQUIRES ANY INCREASE IN RESIDENTIAL DENSITYDENSITY BE A MAJOR CHANGE TO THE BASIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND NO FLEXIBILITY THERE. SO THAT'S WHY WE'RE HERE.

>> THANK YOU, AARON.

>> NEXT, I CALL ON THE REPRESENTATIVE FROM SIMS, TO PROVIDE ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION.

>> CHARLESTON DEVELOPMENT, 2500 ORD ROAD.

IF I CAN ANSWER ANY ESTIONS.

>> THANK YOU. I APPRECIATE YOU BEING HERE.

NEWILL CALL ON THE DIRECTOR TOMAKE ANY COMMENTS AND PROVIDE ANY ADDITI

INFORMATION? >>

NONE TONIGHT. >> OKAY.

IS ANYONE HERE ENT WHO WISHES TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF THE APPROVAL OF THIS ISSUE? IS THERE ANYONE PRESENT WHO WISHES TO SPEAK AGAINST THE APPROVAL OF THIS ISSUE? OKAY.

SO NEXT I WOULD CALL ON THE HUBER HEIGHTS CITY COUNSEL TO PROVIDE COMMENTS, ASK QUESTIONS OR PROVIDE ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. DON? KATE?

>> THANK YOU, MAYOR AARON, COULD YOU PLEASE ANSWER A QUESTION FOR ME, POSSIBLY? SO, I HAVE NOEM WITH THE PROJECT. CAN U TELL ME ABOUT THE NEIGHBORS TO THE NORTH OF THE PROJECT? HOW TALL ARE THEY?

>> TO NORTH?

>> ARE THERE APARTMENT BUILDINGS TO THE NORTH? MAYBE I'M RECALLING IT WRONG.

>> THERE ARE. THIS IS EASIER TO SEE.

SO DIRECTLY TO THE NORTH -- SORT OF THE NORTHWEST ARE SINGLE- FAMILY HOMES AND THE BUILDING WILL BE SET BACK FURTHER AWAY FROM THE SINGLE- FAMILY HOMES WHICH IS A POSITIVE.

AS FAR AS THE MULTI- MILY REALLY ON THE PERIMETER OF PROPERTY LINE ARE THE GARAGES. SO I K -- NOT THAT THERE'S NOT GOING TO BE ANY IMPACT, BUT THERE WILL MINIMAL CT TO THE PROPERTIES TO THE NORTH ESPECIALLY SINCE THEY'RE SLIDING THE BACK EDGE OF THE BUILDING

FURTHER AWAY. >> WILL THERE BEBE PLANTINGS?

>> THE ORIGINAL PLAN ALWAYS HAD BUFFERING ON THNORTH SO THAT WON'T CHANGE.

THERE WILL STILL BE SCREENING.

>> WILL THERE BE MORE EVERGREEN THAN HARDWOODS?

>> WE CAN REVISIT THAT WITH THE

APPLICANT. >> THANK YOU.

THAT WAS MY ONLY QUESTION. >> DON?

>> THESE MAY BE BETTER SUITED FOR THE DEVELOPER, BUT MY QUESTION WOULD BE -- FIRST, A COMMENT, I THINK. HARD QUALITY, THE FINISH AND EVERYTHING WAS BEAUTIFUL.

>> CAN YOU ASSURE USUS YOU'LL MAINTAIN THAT LOOK AND FEEL, AND IT WON'T BE OF A LESSER QUALITY OR A LESSER FEEL.

>> NO, IT IS OUR TRADITION TO TAB OUR HOMES WITH THAT QUALITY.

>> THE GABLE, I THINK WE ARE ALL GOING TO THE OPEN HOUSES AND THE BEAUTIFUL PRODUCT. SO BASICALLY, IT'S JUST A LITTLE SMALLER SQUARE FOOTAGE, BUT THE SAME CHARACTER.

>> YES, SIR. AND THANK YOU FOR SUPPORTING OUR COMMUNE KIT, AS WELL.

>> GREAT.

THANK YOU. THANK YOU.

>> ANYONE ELSE? OKAY.

I WILL ASK ONE MORE TIME IF THERE IS ANYONE PRESENT WHO WANTS TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF OR AGAINST THIS DN? BARRING ANY FURTHER COMMENTS THE PUBLIC COMMENT FOR MC 25-25 IS HEREBY CLOSED.

>> SO NEXT WE'LL MOVE TO ITEM 11M UNDER ADMINISTRATION.

[ An Ordinance To Approve A Basic Development Plan On Approximately 3.778 Acres For Construction Of A New Irish Pub Themed Restaurant For The Property Located At 6900 Executive Boulevard And Further Identified As Parcel Number P70 01820 0013 On The Montgomery County Auditor’s Map And To Accept The Recommendation Of The Planning Commission (Case BDP 25-23). (first reading)]

[01:05:04]

>> ITEM 11M AN ORDINANCE TO APPROVE THE BASIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN ON APPROXIMATELY 3. 778 ACRES FOR THE CON STRUGZ OF A NEW IRISH PUB THEME RESTAURANT FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 6900 EXECUTIVE BOULEVARD P70-01820-0013 ON THE MONTGOMERY COUNTY AUDITOR'S MAP AND TO ACCEPT THE RECOMMENDATION CASE BDP.

25-23. ADOPT THIS ITEM THIS EVENING.

IS THERE A MOTION TO WAIVE?

>> SCOTT? >> A MOTION AND A SECOND. IS THERE ANY DISCUSSION? TONY?

A MOTION AND A SECOND. ANY DISCUSSION? TONY?

[ An Ordinance To Approve A Basic Development Plan On Approximately 18 Acres For A Proposed 3,500 Patron Capacity Indoor Music Center For The Property Located At 7151 Executive Boulevard And Further Identified As Parcel Numbers P70 03910 0083 And P70 03910 0084 On The Montgomery County Auditor’s Map And To Accept The Recommendation Of The Planning Commission (Case BDP 25-24). (first reading)]

>> MOTION CARRIES 9 TO 0.

>> NEXT WE HAVE ITEM 11N.

>> AN ORDINANCE TO APPROVE A BASIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN ON APPROXIMATELY 18 ACRES FOR A PROPOSED 3500 PATRON CAPACITY INDOOR MUSIC CENTER FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 7151 EXECUTIVE BOULEVARD AND FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS PARCEL NUMBERS P70-03910-0083 AND P70-03910-0084 ON THE MONTGOMERY COUNTY AUDITOR'S MAP IN CASE BDP 25-24, FIRST READING.

>> I HAVE NOTHING FURTHER, SIR.

>> RECOMMENDATION AND THE WORK SESSION WAS TO PASS THIS

[ An Ordinance To Approve A Major Change To The Basic Development Plan On Approximately 15.93 Acres To Increase The Density From 74 Units To 91 Total Units For The Property Located At Gable Way And State Route 201 And Further Identified As Parcel Number P70 03910 0088 On The Montgomery County Auditor’s Map And To Accept The Recommendation Of The Planning Commission (Case MC 25-25). (first reading)]

ON TO A SECOND READING. WE'LL DO THAT. NEXT UP IS ITEM 11O.

>> ITEM 11. IN ORDINANCE TO APPROVE A MAJOR CHANGE ON APPROXIMATELY 15. 93 ACRES TO INCREASE THE DENSITY FROM 74 UNITS TO 91 TOTAL UNITS FOR THE PROPERTY IN GABLE WAY, FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS P07- ON 03910-0088 ON THE MONTGOMERY COUNTY AUDITOR'S MAP ACCEPT THE CASE MC 25-25.

TONY ANY COMMENTS? >> NO,

SIR. >> MOTION TO ADOPT AND THEN I HAVE A QUESTION.

>> IT PASSES AND ASSIGNED TO A SECOND READING. YOU WANT TO DO THAT OR -- DO YOU WANT TO MAKE A MOTION?

>> IT WOULD BE A MOTION FIRST AND A MOTION TO WAIVE THE SECOND.

>> KATE? >> SECOND.

I HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND TO WAIVE THE SECOND READING. ANY DISCUSSION? YES?

>> AARON, WHEN WILL THE CITY WORK WITH THE BUILDER AND RESOLVE THE CRA FIVE-YEAR SPLIT TO THE CITY? IS THAT IN HERE.

>> NO. THERE ARE REALLY TWO SEPARATE ISSUES.

>> OKAY. IT'S STAFF'S OPINION THAT THE PROJECT REALLY HASN'T CHANGED THAT MUCH, AND THERE IS SOME FLEXIBILITY IN THE LANGUAGE OF THE CRA AGREEMENT THAT WOULD ALLOW US TO MOVE FORWARD JUST AS THE PROJECT IS.

>> SO WOULD YOU EXPLAIN HOW THAT'S LAID OUT? IS IT TEN, THE FIRST TEN TO THE DEVELOPER AND THE LAST FIVE TO THE RESIDENTS AND TO THE CITY?

>> SO, IT'S FIRST TEN IS THE EXEMPTION FOR THE BENEFITS OF THE PROPERTY OWNER D THEN THE LAST FIVE IS TO US.

>> AND THERE WAS AN AGREEMENT THAT WAS FILED WITH THE RECORDER'S OFFICE OF NTGOME ORIGINAL BUILD THAT CAUSED THAT ISSUE TO COME

BEFORE COUNCIL. >> CORRECT.

>> AND I THINK MAYBE OUR INTERIM CITY MANAGER HAD RECEIVED A LETTER FROM THE BUILDER AND HAD TAKEN IT UPON HIMSELF TO GRANT THAT OR APPROVE THAT AND THAT'S WHAT THE HICCUP WAS LAST TIME.

>> OKAY, BUT YOU ARE GOING TO COME BACK AND RECOMMEND THAT TO US AND PROBABLY GIVE US AN OPPORTUNITY TO VOTE ON THAT?

>> SO I WILL BE -- WHAT I HAD SUGGESTED TO JORDAN IS THAT WE SEE HOW THE VOTE HAPPENS TODAY.

>> -- AND THEN WE WILL REVISIT THAT AND IF COUNCIL, IF IT'S COUNCIL'S DIRECTIVE -- LEGAL COUNSEL'S DIRECTIVE TO BRING THE DOCUMENT BACK TO COUNCIL THEN WE WILL.

OKAY. THANK YOU. MY MOTION TO WAIVE HAS BEEN SECONDED.

>> MOTION CARRIES 9 TO 0. NEXT, WE NEED A MOTION TO ADOPTION.

>> DISCUSSION? TONY?

[01:10:07]

>> A MOTION AND A SECOND. ANY DISCUSSION? TONY?

[ A Resolution Authorizing The Purchase Of Employee Health Insurance Services For The City Of Huber Heights For Fiscal Year 2026 And Waiving The Competitive Bidding Requirements. (first reading)]

MOTION TO ADOPT. CARRIES 9 TO 0.

NEXT UP IS ITEM 11P.

>> A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE PURCHASE OF EMPLOYEE HEALTH INSURANCE SERVICES FOR THE CITY OF HUB EARN HEIGHTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 20 TWIEKS AND WAIVING THE COMPETITIVE BIDDING REQUIREMENTS OF THE FIRST READING.

>> JOHN? >> THIS IS A REMINDER OUTLINED LAST WEEK. ANNUALLY WE GO THROUGH THIS PROCESS. OUR CURRENT PROVIDER CAME IN WITH A SUBSTANTIAL INCREASE OF 30%. WE TOOK IT OUT THROUGH OUR AGENT -- OUR INSURANCE AGENT TO BID AND WE LAID IT ON CIGNA AS OUR NEXT HEALTHCARE PROVIDER AT A 5% INCREASE.

>> THANK YOU, JOHN. WORK SESSION RECLAMATION WAS TO ADOPT THE ITEM THIS EVENING. IS THERE A MOTION?

>> WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND.

ANY DISCUSSION? KATE?

>> JOHN, HAVE WE ESTABLISHED THE PREMIUMS? CAN WE HAVE IT SENT TO COUNCIL?

>> ANY DISION? MR. AIKINS?

>> THANK YOU, MAYOR.

[ A Resolution Authorizing The City Manager To Solicit Bids For Services Related To The Construction And Renovation Of City Hall. (first reading)]

>> MOTION CARRIES 9 TO 0. NEXT UP IS ITEM 11Q.

>> A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGE TORE SOLICIT BIDS FOR SERVICES RELATED TO THE CONSTRUCTION AND RENOVATION OF CITY HALL.

FIRST READING.

>> JOHN? >> JUST TO REVIEW ALEX'S PRESENTATION LAST WEEK WE WILL BE VACATING THIS FA AND MOVING TO THE NEW GOVERNMENT CENTER. AFTER THAT WE'LL BE RENOVATING THE FIRST FLOOR. FINANCE WILL BE STAYING UPSTAIRS. WE WILL RENOVATE UPSTAIRS AND WHEN IT IS ALL SAID AND DONE WE'LL HAVE FINANCE UPSTAIRS AND TAX AND WATER FOR THE RESIDENTS AS A ONE- STOP BILL PAY.

>> RECOMMENDATION WAS ADOPTION. IS THERE A MOTION?

>> FRED? ? MOTION

TO ADOPT. >> WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND. ANY DISCUSSION? TONY?

>> OKAY. MR. WEBB HAS LEFT THE ROOM.

[ A Resolution Authorizing The City Manager To Enter Into Contract For The Water Main Improvement At Walmac Street And Betal Court Project. (first reading)]

THE MOTION CARRIES 8 TO 0. NEXT UP IS ITEM 11R.

RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGE TORE ENTER INTO A CONTRACT FOR THE WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENT AT WALMAC AND BETAL COURT.

>> THIS IS FOR CONSTRUCTION UTILITIES AND $360,000.

>> OKAY. AND THE RECOMMENDATIS TO ADOPT THIS ITEM THIS EVENING. IS THERE A MOTION?

>> MOVE TO ADOPT, AND I WILL SECOND. IS THERE ANY DISCUSSION? OKAY. TONY?

[ A Resolution Authorizing The City Manager To Enter Into A Contract Modification With Environmental Design Group For Right Of Way Acquisition Services For The Chambersburg Road West Improvements Project. (first reading)]

>> AND THE MOTION CARRIES 8-0. NEXT IS ITEM 11S.

>> ITES. A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO ENTERS INTO A CONTRACT MODIFICATION FOR ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN GROUP FOR RIGHT OF WAY ACQUISITION SERVICES FOR THE CHAMBERSBURG ROAD WEST IMPROVT PROS JECT.

>> AS RUSS OUTLINED PRETTY EXTENSIVE MODIFICATIONS FOR 30 PARCELS AND 16 OWNERS.

AT THE END, THE INCREASE WILL BE 46,950 TO ACCOMPLISH THIS.

>> WORK SESSION RECOMMENDATION WAS TO ADOPT THAT THIS EVENING. IS THERE A MOTION? NANCY?

>> SECOND. WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND. IS THERE DISCUSSION? TONY?

>> IS THERE A SECOND?

>> MARK?

[ A Resolution Authorizing The City Manager To Enter Into Contract For The Powell Road S Curve Realignment Project. (first reading)]

>> MOTION CARRIES 8 TO 0. NEXT IS ITEM 11T.

>> A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGE TORE ENTER INTO A CONTRACT FOR THE POWELL ROAD S CURVE REALIGNMENT PROJECT.

>> THIS IS THE POWELL ROAD S CURVE AND WHAT'S ACROSS THE STREET? WHERE THE CLUB EXISTS NOW.

THIS IS JUST, AGAIN, THE BID.

[01:15:03]

>> RECOMMENDATION IS THE WORK SESSION WAS TO ADOPT.

IS THERE A MOTION?

FRED. >> MOTION TO ADOPT.

>> WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND. IS THERE DISCUSSION?

>> TONY. MR. DAVIDSON.

>> MOTION CARRIES 8 TO 0. NEXT IS ITEM 11U.

[ An Ordinance Establishing A Municipal Tree Program, Authorizing A Joint Parks And Recreation And Public Works Tree Management Function, And Enhancing Tree-Care Standards For Public Property. (first reading)]

>> ITEM 11U. AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A MUNICIPAL TREE PROGRAM AUTHORIZING A JOINT PARKS AND RECREATION AND PUBLIC WORKS TREE MANAGEMENT FUNCTION AND ENHANCING THE TREE- CARE STANDARDS

>> THIS IS ASSIGNING TO PUBLIC WORKS AND PARKS AND PROVIDES GUIDANCE FOR FUTURE DEVELOPMENT.

>> THANKS, JOHN. IT PASSES ON TO A

[ A Resolution Authorizing The City Manager To Enter Into An Adopt A Park Agreement With The Huber Heights Rotary Club. (first reading)]

SECOND READING. ANY OBJECTIONS?

>> WE MOVE ON TO THE SECOND READING AND NEXT UP IS ITEMITEM 11V.

>> A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO ENTER INTO AN ADOPT A RK AGREEMENT WITH THE HUBER HEIGHTS ROTARY CLUB.

>> SARAH HAS BEEN WORKING WITH THE ROTARY IN CONJUNCTION TO FIND A WAY TO ENHANCE THE PARKS AND MAKE THINGS BETTER.

THE ROTARY CLUB CAME TO US AND WOULD LIKE TO BASICALLY TAKE OVER MAINTENANCE AND UPKEEP OF THE SHELTER THERE IN EXCHANGE FOR GETTING THEIR NAME ON THE PARK AND THEY'RE ALSO GOING TO INCREASE SOME BUTTERFLY USE THERE, AS WELL.

>> REMIND ME AGAIN, THE NAME?

>> THE ROTARY MONARCH PARK.

>> THE RECOMMENDATION WAS ADOPTION.

IS THERE A MOTION?

>> MOVE TO ADOPT. >> WE HAVE A MOVE AND A SECOND.

IS THERE DISCUSSION?

>> TONY.

MISS BAKER?

[ An Ordinance Amending Section 943.04 – Park Facilities Of Part Nine, Streets And Public Services Code, Of The City Code Of Huber Heights. (first reading)]

>> MOTION CARRIES 9 TO 0. NEXT WE HAVE ITEM 11W.

>> ITEM 11W. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 943.04. PARK FACILITIES OF PART NINE, STREETS AND PUBLIC SERVICES CODE OF THE CITY CODE OF HUBER HEIGHTS.

>> THIS IS JUST THE OFFICIAL NAMING OF THE ROTARY PARK.

>> MOTION TO ADOPT OR DO WE WANT TO PASS

THIS, TOO? >> IT'S UP TO YOU.

>> I NEED TO START READING. WOULD YOU TO MAKE A MOTION?

>> YES, I WOULD. TO ADOPT OR

TO WAIVE. >> WE HAVE A MOTION TO WAIVE. KATE?

>> I SECOND COUNCILMAN CAMPBELL.

>> DISCUSSION ON WAIVING THE SECOND READING FOR THE NAMING OF THE PARK?

>> JUST THAT WE ADOPTED THE PARK TONIGHT.