[00:00:01]
I'D LIKE TO CALL THE MEETING OF THE CITY
[ AGENDA PROPERTY MAINTENANCE REVIEW BOARD City Hall - Council Chambers 6131 Taylorsville Road October 9, 2025 6:30 P.M.]
OF HUBER HEIGHTS, PROPERTY MAINTENANCE REVIEW BOARD ORDER.MADAM SECRETARY, WOULD YOU PLEASE CALL THE ROLL? ALL RIGHT, MS. KROMER? HERE.
AND I DID HEAR FROM THE OTHER TWO THAT THEY WOULD NOT BE HERE.
SO IF THERE'S NO OBJECTION WITHOUT OBJECTION, I WILL ACCEPT THE AGENDA FOR TONIGHT'S MEETING.
IN ACCORDANCE TO THE RULES, I NEED TO SWEAR IN WHOEVER IS SPEAKING TONIGHT.
MR. LAR, WOULD YOU RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND? YOU NEED TO HOLD ON.
OH, I THOUGHT JUST SPEAKING IT WAS GOOD.
I NEED A MOTION TO APPROVE THE AGENDA FROM JULY THE 10TH, OR I'M SORRY, FOR THIS EVENING, I BELIEVE WE APPROVE THE AGENDA.
NOW IN ACCORDANCE, WE SWEAR IN.
DO YOU HEREBY SWEAR OR AFFIRM ON A THREAT OF PERJURY TO TELL THE TRUTH, THE WHOLE TRUTH, AND NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH SO HELP YOU GOD? I DO.
AND I SEE THERE IS NO PENDING BUSINESS.
SO WE'LL GET RIGHT INTO OUR NEW BUSINESS, WHICH IS OUR FIRST CASE.
TONIGHT IS PMRB CASE 25 DASH 24.
PROPERTY OWNER GAULT PROPERTY HOLDINGS.
LLC IS IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 1313 OF THE PROPERTY MAINTENANCE CODE AT PROPERTY.
LOCATED AT 57 37 HARSHMAN MILL ROAD.
GOOD EVERYONE GLAD YOU'RE HERE.
GIVE JERRY JUST A MOMENT TO CATCH UP.
THIS JUST ISN'T WORKING GREATLY.
SO WE'RE, WE WANNA MAKE SURE YOU GET TO SEE THE, THE PHOTOS.
PROPERTY AT 5 7 3 7 HARSHMAN ROAD IS IN VIOLATION OF CITY CODE PERTAINING TO JUNK STORED ON THE PROPERTY UNDER A CARPORT.
THIS CONSISTS OF DISCARDED DOORS AND DRYWALL SECTION 13, 13 0 4 STATES.
ALL PERMISSIBLE ITEMS STORED OUTSIDE MUST BE IN GOOD CONDITION AND USABLE AS INTENDED BY THE MANUFACTURER.
NO SUCH ITEMS THAT ARE BROKEN, DILAPIDATED, OR DISCARDED SHALL BE STORED OUTSIDE.
INSPECTION, VERIFIES THE PROPERTY DOES NOT MEET THE STANDARD SET FORTH IN THE CODE, THEREFORE THE PROPERTY IS IN VIOLATION.
YOUR ATTACHED CASE REVIEW ILLUSTRATES THE VIOLATION PROCESS AND NON-COMPLIANCE OF THE PROPERTY.
THE CITY'S ZONING LETTER MAILED TO THE OWNER OF RECORD HAVE NOT BEEN RETURNED.
THERE HAS BEEN NO COMMUNICATION FROM THE OWNER TO THE CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICE.
TAX RECORDS SHOWS PROPERTY TAXES ARE TRADITIONALLY PAID.
IF DECLARED A NUISANCE BY THE BOARD, THE PROPERTY WILL BE ABATED BY THE CITY'S CONTRACTOR.
ANY COSTS INCURRED BY THE CITY WILL BE INVOICED TO THE PROPERTY OWNER.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS AS FOLLOWS, THE BOARD TO DECLARE THE PROPERTY A NUISANCE, THE BOARD ORDERS STAFF TO HAVE THE CITY CONTRACTOR ABATE THE PROPERTY.
IF SO ORDERED, THE CITY CONTRACTOR WILL BRING THE PROPERTY INTO COMPLIANCE BY REMOVAL OF NUISANCE.
ANYONE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS? LOOKS, THIS IS PROBABLY A RENTAL HOME.
UH, WE ASSUME THERE'S AT LEAST BEEN SOME REMODELING DONE, BUT WE'RE NOT SURE WHAT THE STATUS IS OF THE OCCUPANT, WHETHER IT'S UNOCCUPIED OR NOT.
YOU HAVE ANYTHING FROM ANYONE IN REGARDS TO THIS ONE? NO.
DO ANYONE ELSE HAVE A QUESTION? ENTERTAIN A MOTION PLEASE.
YOU, YOU'LL MAKE A MOTION TO DECLARE THE PROPERTY A NUISANCE AND HAVE THE CITY ABATE IT.
MOTION CARRIES FOR PMRB CASE 25 DASH 24.
THE NEXT CASE IS PMRB CASE 25 DASH 25.
[00:05:01]
OF SECTION 1313 OF THE PROPERTY MAINTENANCE CODE AT PROPERTY LOCATED AT 65 38 GLEN IVY DRIVE.JUST WANTED TO LET YOU GET A FULL VIEW OF THE PROPERTY.
SO THE PROPERTY AT 6 5 3 8 GLEN IVY IS ON VIA VIOLATION OF CITY CODE PERTAINING TO MANY MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS STORED THROUGHOUT THE YARD.
THERE IS ALSO SUBSTANTIAL TRIMMING OF VEGETATION NEEDED.
THE HOUSE IS UNOCCUPIED AND APPARENTLY VISITED ON RARE OCCASIONS BY THE OWNER WHO NOW LIVES ELSEWHERE.
THIS HAS BEEN A NUISANCE PROPERTY FOR YEARS.
IT HAS PREVIOUSLY BEEN BEFORE THIS BOARD SECTION 13, 13 0 4 STATES.
ALL PERMISSIBLE ITEMS STORED OUTSIDE MUST BE IN GOOD CONDITION AND USABLE AS INTENDED BY THE MANUFACTURER.
ITEMS THAT ARE BROKEN, DILAPIDATED OR DISCARDED SHALL BE STORED OUTSIDE INSPECTION VERIFIES THE PROPERTY DOES NOT MEET THE STANDARD SET FORTH IN THE CODE.
THEREFORE THE PROPERTY IS IN VIOLATION.
YOUR ATTACHED CASE REVIEW ILLUSTRATES THE VIOLATION PROCESS AND NON-COMPLIANCE OF THE PROPERTY.
CITY ZONING LETTERS MAILED TO THE OWNER OF RECORD HAVE NOT BEEN RETURNED.
THERE'S BEEN NO COMMUNICATION FROM THE OWNER TO THE CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICE.
ADDITIONALLY, THE POSTING WAS PLACED ON THE FRONT DOOR ADVISING MY INTENT TO BRING THE PROPERTY TO THIS BOARD.
THE POSTING IS ATTACHED TO THE REPORT FILE.
THAT TAX RECORD SHOWS PROPERTY TAXES ARE TRADITIONALLY PAID.
IF DECLARED A NUISANCE BY THE BOARD, THE PROPERTY WILL BE ABATED BY THE CITY'S CONTRACTOR.
ANY COSTS INCURRED BY THE CITY WILL BE INVOICED TO THE PROPERTY OWNER.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION AS THIS FOLLOWS THE BOARD DECLARE THE PROPERTY A NUISANCE.
THE BOARD OFFERS STAFF TO HAVE THE STATE CONTRACTOR ABATE THE PROPERTY.
IF SO ORDERED, THE CITY CONTRACTOR WILL BRING THE PROPERTY INTO COMPLIANCE BY REMOVAL OF THE NUISANCE.
THIS WILL INCLUDE REMOVAL OF ALL ITEMS REGARDLESS OF THE CONDITION AND TRIMMING OF ALL VEGETATION.
UM, ADDITIONALLY, I HAD THE ZONING OFFICER GO BY TODAY.
THERE'S BEEN NO IMPROVEMENT AT THE PROPERTY.
ANYONE HAVE A QUESTION? MR. LAR, CAN YOU TELL ME WHEN THE LAST TIME IT WAS BROUGHT TO US? YOU SAID IT'S BEEN BEFORE, IT HAS BEEN BEFORE THE BOARD.
THIS WILL BE A GUESS ON MY, I WOULD SAY A COUPLE OF YEARS AGO.
AND THE, AT THAT TIME THE OWNER WAS LIVING THERE.
UH, HAD A ZONING OFFICER LAST YEAR THAT WAS WORKING WITH HER.
HE'S NO LONGER WITH US, BUT TRYING TO MOVE HER ALONG.
UM, SHE WOULD MAKE SOME VERY SLIGHT IMPROVEMENTS TO THE FRONT YARD.
UH, VIETNAMESE LADY, CULTURALLY QUITE DIFFERENT FROM US AS FAR AS WHAT YOU DO IN YOUR YARD OR DON'T DO.
AND, UH, HE WORKED WITH OR TO NO AVAIL.
AND UH, WE'VE HAD A COUPLE OF VERY CONCERNED NEIGHBORS.
ONE LIVING NEXT DOOR AS YOU CAN IMAGINE.
SO ENOUGH'S ENOUGH WHERE, YOU KNOW, WE'RE NOT EVEN LOOKING TO SEE IF THE, THE GARDEN TOOLS THAT ARE BEING STORED OUTSIDE OUR SERVICEABLE OR NOT.
WE'RE TAKING EVERYTHING THAT'S NOT BOLTED DOWN.
IS THAT INCLUDING THE BAGS OF SOIL I SAW ON THE PICTURE AS WELL, SIR.
IS THAT INCLUDING THE BAGS OF SOIL? SOIL I SAW ON THE PICTURES? YEP.
BECAUSE YOU'RE NOT SUPPOSED TO STORE ANYTHING IN THE FRONT YARD ACCORDING TO OUR OUTDOOR STORAGE AND USE CODE, REGARDLESS OF WHAT IT IS OR WHAT IS INTENDED TO USE SIS.
SO WE'LL TAKE, WE'LL TAKE EVERYTHING.
I WAS JUST CURIOUS AS TO, NOBODY'S COMPLAINED FOR TWO YEARS OR OH NO, NO.
THE PROBLEM IS THERE WOULD BE A LITTLE BIT OF AN IMPROVEMENT.
THE ZONING OFFICER WHO WAS WORKING WITH HER, UM, I BELIEVE GAVE HER TOO MUCH TIME.
AND SOMETIMES YOU JUST ENOUGH'S ENOUGH.
WE'RE WE'RE THERE THAT THIS AS A REPEAT OFFENDER SO TO SPEAK? UH, YES.
WE'VE BEEN TO THIS PROPERTY MANY TIMES.
WELL WE'RE, WE'RE HOPING THAT SINCE SHE IS NO LONGER LIVING AT THE PROPERTY, 'CAUSE SHE HAD BEEN PREVIOUSLY LIVING THERE, UM, THAT ONCE WE CLEAR ALL OF THIS UP, CLEAN UP ALL OF THIS YARD MESS, ALL OF THE VEGETATION THAT WE WILL HAVE THIS OCCUR AGAIN.
BUT WE'LL BE WATCHING IT, BELIEVE ME.
[00:10:02]
HAVE A MOTION PLEASE? I MOVE FOR THE PROPERTY OF NUISANCE AND HAVE STAFF ABATE IT AND I SECOND, I'LL SECOND THAT.THEN WE'LL HAVE A VOTE PLEASE.
MOTION CARRIES FOR PMRB CASE 25 DASH 25.
NEXT CASE IS PMRB CASE 25 DASH 26.
THE PROPERTY OWNER SILVER BEARS REAL ESTATE IS IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 1189 OF THE PROPERTY MAINTENANCE CODE AT PROPERTY LOCATED AT 76 31 DASH OR THROUGH 77 77 OLD TROY PIKE.
MR. CHAIRMAN BOARD MEMBERS OF THE PROPERTY ALSO KNOWN AS WAYNE TOWN ZA, IS IN VIOLATION OF CITY CODE AS IT PERTAINS TO SIGN MAINTENANCE.
THE SOUTH FACADE OF THE OLD TROY PIKE MULTI-TENANT SIGN THAT'S A LARGE ONE OUT BY THE ROAD IS SO DETERIORATED THAT THE WAYNE TOWN LETTERS HAVE ACTUALLY PEELED AWAY FROM THE FACADE.
THEY'RE ALSO BIRDS LIVING IN IT.
SO, UH, SECTION 11 89 0 4 STATES EVERY SIGN WHETHER REQUIRING A SIGN PERMIT OR NOT, SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A SAFE, PRESENTABLE, AND GOOD STRUCTURAL CONDITION AT ALL TIMES, INCLUDING REPLACEMENT OF A DEFECTIVE PART, PAINTING, CLEANING, AND OTHER ACTS REQUIRED FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE SIGN.
INSPECTION VERIFIES THE PROPERTY DOES NOT MEET THE STANDARDS SET FORTH IN THE CODE, THEREFORE THE PROPERTY IS IN VIOLATION.
YOUR ATTACHED CASE REVIEW ILLUSTRATES THE VIOLATION PROCESS AND NON-COMPLIANCE OF THE PROPERTY.
THE ATTACHED PHOTO SHOWS THE DETERIORATION CITY'S OWN LETTERS MAILED TO THE OWNER OF RECORD HAVE NOT BEEN RETURNED.
THERE HAS BEEN RECENT COMMUNICATION FROM THE OWNER OF THE CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICE.
THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE STATES THEY HAVE CONTRACTED WITH A SIGNED COMPANY TO MAKE REPAIRS, BUT THIS IS AFTER MONTHS OF NO COMMUNICATION NOR ACTION REGARDING THIS VIOLATION.
THE TAX RECORD SHOWS PROPERTY TAXES ARE TRADITIONALLY PAID.
IF DECLARED A NUISANCE BY THE BOARD, THE PROPERTY WILL BE ABATED BY THE CITY STAFF.
THE BOARD DECLARE THE PROPERTY A NUISANCE.
THE BOARD ORDERS STAFF TO HAVE THE CITY ABATE THE PROPERTY.
IF SO ORDERED, THE CITY WILL BRING THE PROPERTY INTO COMPLIANCE BY REMOVAL OF THE NUISANCE.
THIS WILL INVOLVE OBTAINING QUOTES FROM SIGNED VENDORS TO DETERMINE THE PRICE FOR MAKING THE NEEDED REPAIR AND MOVING FORWARD WITH REPAIRS.
NOW THIS REPORT WAS WRITTEN FOR LAST MONTH'S MEETING.
UH, THE SIGN FACE THAT WAS THERE HAS BEEN REMOVED, COMPLETELY REMOVED.
THE UH, OWNER HAS CONTRACTED WITH FAST SIGNS, A SIGNED COMPANY IN HUBER HEIGHTS.
SPOKE WITH THEM TODAY BECAUSE I HAD ISSUED A PERMIT FOR IT.
AND THEY CURRENTLY HAVE THE PRODUCTION DONE IN THEIR, UH, IN THEIR BUILDING.
BUT THEY HAVE TO ATTACH CLIPS BECAUSE THEY HAVE TO REATTACH THE SIGN PANEL.
SO IT'S READY TO GO BACK UP AS SOON AS THEY, EVERYTHING'S FASTENED.
AND IT WILL BE A NICER SIGN 'CAUSE IT'LL HAVE LED LIGHTING IN INSIDE.
SO, UH, WHAT IF YOU WOULD LOOK AT IT TODAY, YOU WOULD SEE THAT PANEL IS GONE.
THE ONE THAT SAYS WAYNE TOWN, IT'S EMPTY AND THAT'S THE REASON WHY.
SO YOU'RE SAYING IT'S IN THE MIDST OF BEING REPAIRED? YES.
I TALKED, TALKED TO THE SALES REP AT, UH, FAST SIGNS WHO I DEAL WITH ON A REGULAR BASIS.
SHE WENT BACK TO THEIR MANUFACTURING AREA AND SAID YES, IT'S BACK THERE.
WE'RE JUST WAITING FOR THE TIP, THE CLIPS TO BE ATTACHED SO WE CAN REATTACH IT TO THE SIGN ONCE WE HAVE THE LED LIGHTING IN PLACE.
SO SHE'S TELLING ME BY THE END OF OCTOBER IT SHOULD BE IN PLACE.
UM, AND SO MY QUESTION IS, YOU STILL WANT TO, YOUR RECOMMENDATION IS STILL DECLARE A NUISANCE AND HAVE IT ABATED WHEN IT'S IN THE PROCESS OR DO WE YES.
SO SHE TOLD ME TODAY WE ARE GONNA FINISH THIS UP WHEN WE GET PAID BY THE, BY THE CUSTOMER.
SHE WAS GOING TO CONTACT THE CUSTOMER AND VERIFY THAT THE CHECK'S IN THE MAIL, FOR LACK OF A BETTER WORD, I HAVE NOT HEARD BACK FROM HER.
SO I'M GOING TO GO ON THE PREMISE.
I'LL HANDLE THE ABATEMENT WITH THE SIGNED CONTRACTOR.
'CAUSE I'M QUITE CERTAIN IT'S GOING TO BE TAKEN CARE OF.
BUT I DON'T THINK WE MAKE AN EXCEPTION TO THIS CASE JUST BECAUSE WE HAVE A PROMISE
[00:15:01]
OF THEM FIXING IT.'CAUSE IT'S NOT FIXED AS OF THE DATE OF THE MEETING.
THAT MAKES QUESTIONING, THAT MAKES SENSE TO ME.
ALRIGHT, ANYBODY ELSE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS? ALRIGHT, UH, QUESTION.
OKAY, YOU HAVE A MOTION PLEASE.
I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO DECLARE THE PROPERTY A NUISANCE AND TO HAVE THE CITY CONTRACTOR ABATE THE PROPERTY.
SECOND, AND THEN A VOTE, PLEASE.
MOTION CARRIES FOR PMRB CASE 25 DASH 26.
NICK CASE IS PM RRB 25 DASH 28 PROPERTY OWNER SUSAN GORDON IS IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 1313 OF THE PROPERTY MAINTENANCE CODE AT PROPERTY LOCATED AT 71 58 MANDRAKE DRIVE.
THE PROPERTY AT 71 58 MANDA MANDRAKE DRIVE IS IN VIOLATION OF CITY CODE AS IT PERTAINS TO EXTERIOR MAINTENANCE OF THE HOUSE.
THE VACANT HOUSE HAS SEVERAL ISSUES THAT ARE ABUNDANTLY CLEAR, FALLING, SOFTENING, DETERIORATED, GARAGE DOOR MOLDING, LOOSE DOWNSPOUTS AND MOLD ON THE SIDING SECTION 13 13 0 4 STATES.
THE EXTERIOR OF A STRUCTURE SHALL BE MAINTAINED AT GOOD REPAIR, STRUCTURALLY SOUND, AND SAN SANITARY.
SO AS NOT TO POSE A THREAT TO THE PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY, OR WELFARE, THE OWNER SHALL KEEP THE EXTERIOR OF ALL PREMISES AND EVERY STRUCTURE THERE ON IN GOOD REPAIR.
ALL EXTERIOR SURFACES SHALL BE MAINTAINED FREE OF CONDITIONS, REFLECTIVE OF DETERIORATION OR INADEQUATE MAINTENANCE.
MAINTENANCE INSPECTION VERIFIES THE PROPERTY DOES NOT MEET THE STANDARDS SET FORTH IN THE CODE.
THEREFORE, THE PROPERTY IS IN VIOLATION.
YOUR ATTACHED CASE REVIEW REVIEW ILLUSTRATES THE VIOLATION PROCESS AND NON-COMPLIANCE OF THE PROPERTY.
THE ATTACHED PHOTO SHOWS NEGLIGENCE AND DETERIORATION CITY'S OWNER ENTER MAY FOR THE OWNER OF RECORD HAVE NOT BEEN RETURNED.
THERE HAS BEEN NO COMMUNICATION FROM THE OWNER TO THE CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICE.
THE TAX RECORD SHOWS PROPERTY TAXES ARE TRADITIONALLY PLA PAID IF DECLARED A NUISANCE BY THE BOARD OR THE PROPERTY WILL BE ABATED BY THE CITY.
ANY COSTS INCURRED BY THE CITY WILL BE INVOICED TO THE PROPERTY OWNER.
RECOMMENDATION IS IS AS FOLLOWS, THE BOARD DECLARE THE PROPERTY A NUISANCE.
THE BOARD ORDERS STAFF TO HAVE THE CITY ABATE TO THE PROPERTY.
IF SO ORDERED, THE CITY WILL BRING THE PROPERTY INTO COMPLIANCE.
BY REMOVABLE OF NUISANCE, THE CITY'S CONTRACTOR WILL MAKE ANY NECESSARY REPAIRS TO BRING THE PROPERTY INTO A PROPER STATE OF EXTERIOR MAINTENANCE.
ARE THOSE WINDOWS BROKEN? A COUPLE OF 'EM.
OR IS IT JUST A REFLECTION? I THINK IT'S A COMBINATION OF, I THINK YOU HAVE BOTH SITUATIONS THERE.
ANY IDEA IF THE OWNER IS DECEASED OR NOT? NO IDEA SIR.
ANYBODY ELSE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS? ALRIGHT.
PLEASE MAKE A MOTION TO DECLARE THE PROPERTY OF NUISANCE AND HAVE STAFF ABATE IT.
MOTION CARRIES FOR PMRB CASE 25 DASH 28.
NEXT CASE IS PM RRB 25 DASH 30.
THE PROPERTY OWNER, SHIRLEY CRISWELL, IS IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 1313 OF THE PROPERTY MAINTENANCE CODE.
THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 59 0 1 PENNYWELL DRIVE.
THE PROPERTY AT 59 0 1 PENNWELL IS IN VIOLATION OF CITY CODE AS IT PERTAINS TO THE MAINTENANCE OF THE LANDSCAPING.
SPECIFICALLY NOXIOUS WEEDS NOT BEING TRIMMED AND REMOVED FROM THE PROPERTY, PARTICULARLY ALONG THE HOUSE AND FENCE LINE'S.
LOOKS LIKE THAT PICTURE MIGHT BE A LITTLE OVER SCANNED.
JERRY, BRING THE HOUSE THE OTHER WAY.
[00:20:01]
HOLY GOODNESS.SECTION 13 13 0 4 H FOUR STATES.
ALL LAND SHALL BE PROPERLY MAINTAINED WITH LAWNS, HEDGES, BUSHES, TREES, AND OTHER VEGETATION TO BE TRIMMED AND KEPT FROM BECOMING OVERGROWN AND UNSIGHTLY.
WHERE EXPOSED TO PUBLIC VIEW OR SUCH VEGETATION MAY CONSTITUTE A LIGHTING INFLUENCE ON ADJOINING PROPERTY INSPECTION.
VERIFIES THE PROPERTY DOES NOT MEET THE STANDARDS SET FORTH IN THE CODE.
THEREFORE, THE PROPERTY'S IN VIOLATION CITY'S OWN LETTERS MAILED TO THE OWNER OF RECORD HAVE NOT BEEN RETURNED.
THERE HAS BEEN NO COMMUNICATION TO THE OWNER TO THE CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICE.
TAX RECORDS SHOW PROPERTY TAXES ARE TRADITIONALLY PAID.
IF DECLARED A NUISANCE BY THE BOARD, THE PROPERTY WILL BE ABATED BY THE CITY.
ANY COSTS INCURRED BY THE CITY WILL BE INVOICED TO THE PROPERTY STAFF.
RECOMMENDATION IS AS FOLLOWS, THE BOARD DECLARE THE PROPERTY A NUISANCE.
THE BOARD ORDERS STAFF TO HAVE THE CITY ABATE THE PROPERTY.
IF SO ORDERED, THE CITY WILL BRING THE PROPERTY IN COMPLIANCE BY REMOVAL OF THE NUISANCE.
IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, YOU MAY HAVE ANSWERED THIS ALREADY, BUT IS THE PROPERTY VACANT? NO.
ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? ANYONE? ALRIGHT.
I MAKE A MOTION TO DECLARE THE PROPERTY A NUISANCE AND HAVE THE CITY ABATE IT.
MOTION CARRIES FOR PMRB CASE 25 DASH THREE ZERO.
MR. CHAIRMAN, I REALIZE THE SAME THING GETS SAID OVER AND OVER AND OVER IN THESE CASE REVIEWS, BUT FOR THE RECORDS, I THINK WE NEED TO, WE NEED TO MAKE THAT SAME STATEMENT WITH EACH CASE.
THAT'S WHY YOU HEAR THE SAME VERBIAGE IN EACH, IN EACH CASE.
SO IT SEEMS UNNECESSARY, BUT I I THINK IT PROBABLY IS NECESSARY FOR LEGAL RECORDS.
ALRIGHT, NEXT CASE IS PMRB CASE 25 DASH 31.
THE PROPERTY OWNER, DANNY CALDWELL, IS IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 1313 OF THE PROPERTY MAINTENANCE CODE LOCATED AT PROPERTY.
UH, LOOK PROPERTY LOCATED AT 62 19 APACHE STREET.
THE PICTURE DOES TELL THE STORY HERE.
THE PROPERTY AT 62 19 APACHE STREET IS A VIOLATION OF THE CITY'S OUTDOOR STORAGE CODE.
NUMEROUS JUNK AND DISCARDED ITEMS HAVE ACCUMULATED ON THIS PROPERTY.
THE PROPERTY HAS BEEN A NUISANCE FOR YEARS AND HAS APPEARED BEFORE THIS BOARD.
WE'VE ALSO DONE NUMEROUS TRASH ABATEMENTS AT THE PROPERTY, WHICH DON'T REQUIRE BOARD HEARINGS.
UH, THERE ARE, UH, AS STATED, UH, SECTION 13 13 0 4 STATES.
ANY ITEMS A USER STORED OUTSIDE OF AN ENCLOSED BUILDING OR STRUCTURE SHALL BE LIMITED TO ITEMS MANUFACTURED FOR, INTENDED FOR OR CUSTOMARILY USED IN OUTBOARD ENVIRONMENTS.
NO ITEMS MANUFACTURED FOR, INTENDED FOR OR CUSTOMARILY STORED OR USED INDOORS MAY BE PLACED OR STORED OUTSIDE.
LAWN AND POWER EQUIPMENT MUST BE KEPT IN THE BACKYARD EVEN WHEN USED ON A REGULAR BASIS.
ALL PERMISSIBLE ITEMS STORED OUTSIDE MUST BE IN GOOD CONDITION AND USABLE IS INTENDED BY THE MANUFACTURER.
NO SUCH ITEMS THAT ARE BROKEN, DILAPIDATED OR DISCARDED SHALL BE STORED OUTSIDE.
INVESTIGATE, INSPECTION, VERIFIES THE PROPERTY DOES NOT MEET THE STANDARDS SET FORTH IN THE CODE.
THEREFORE THE PROPERTY IS IN VIOLATION.
YOU ATTACH CASE REVIEW ILLUSTRATES THE VIOLATION PROCESS AND NONCOMPLIANCE OF THE PROPERTY.
THE ATTACHED PHOTO SHOWS THE ITEMS STORED ON THE PROPERTY AS OF AUGUST 19TH, 2025.
IT HAS BEEN, REINSPECTED HAS NOT GOTTEN ANY BETTER.
THE OWNER OF RECORD HAVE NOT BEEN RETURNED.
THERE HAS BEEN NO COMMUNICATION FROM THE OWNER OCCUPANT TO THE CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER.
WHILE THE LISTED OWNER HAS BEEN DECEASED FOR SEVERAL YEARS, HIS SON OCCUPIES THEIR PROPERTY AND HAS BEEN SPOKEN TO BY AN OFFICER AND IS WELL AWARE OF THE VIOLATION.
HIS NORMAL PRACTICE IS LET THE CITY CLEAN UP THE PROPERTY AS HE KNOWS FEES WILL BE ACCESSED TO PROPERTY TAXES.
THE TAX RECORD SHOWS PROPERTY TAXES ARE NOT TRADITIONALLY PAID.
IF DECLARED A NUISANCE BY THE BOARD, THE PROPERTY WILL BE ABED BY THE CITY.
ANY COSTS INCURRED BY THE CITY WILL BE INVOICED TO THE PROPERTY.
ENTER STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS AS FOLLOWS, THE BOARD DECLARE
[00:25:01]
THEIR PROPERTY A NUISANCE.THE BOARD ORDERS STAFF TO HAVE THE CITY ABATE THE PROPERTY.
IF SO ORDERED, THE CITY WILL BRING THEIR PROPERTY IN COMPLIANCE BY REMOVAL OF THE NUISANCE.
SO I THINK YOU MAY HAVE PARTIALLY ANSWERED THIS ALREADY, BUT I KNOW THIS HAS BEEN BEFORE OUR BOARD SEVERAL TIMES BEFORE THE BOTH THE NAME AND THE ADDRESS SOUND FAMILIAR TO MY YEARS.
UM, ESSENTIALLY THE SAME THING KEEPS HAPPENING.
IT IS, IT IS PICKED UP AND THEN TRASH IS NEW.
TRASH IS THROWN OUT THERE ESSENTIALLY.
HE, SO IT'S A, IT IS AN UNFORTUNATE SITUATION.
THE, THE PERSON WHO LIVES THERE IS THE SON OF THE OWNER.
HE IS DISABLED IN A COUPLE OF DIFFERENT WAYS NOW PHYSICALLY AS WELL.
THIS IS IN THE MIAMI VILLA'S DEVELOPMENT, WHICH IS DOWN OFF RIP RAP ROAD.
HE'LL GO AROUND THE DEVELOPMENT CLEANING PEOPLE'S YARDS UP FOR REMUNERATION.
UM, AND THEN JUST BRINGS IT HOME AND DUMPS IT ON HIS PROPERTY.
AND HE KNOWS AT SOME POINT WE WILL COME BY AND SAY, I'M GONNA GET IT CLEANED UP.
HE'S LIVED THERE BEFORE WITH NO ELECTRICITY IN THAT AREA.
THAT MEANS NO WATER BECAUSE THEY'RE ON WELLS.
SO WE'VE HAD ISSUES BEFORE AT THAT PROPERTY, UM, WHERE THERE WERE FIVE GALLON BUCKETS BEING USED FOR PURPOSES THAT THEY'RE NOT INTENDED TO.
AND WE HAVE BEEN NOTIFICATIONS FROM THE BOARD OF HEALTH AT THAT TIME.
SO THIS, AS LONG AS THIS MAN IS LIVING THERE, WE'LL BE DEALING WITH THIS PROPERTY.
WE HAVE TO GO IN OCCASIONALLY AND JUST CLEAN IT UP.
AND THAT'S WHERE WE ARE AT THIS TIME.
AND HE'S, HE KNOWS THAT WE WILL SEND A BILL AND HE KNOWS HE HAS NO MONEY TO PAY IT.
SO IT'LL GO ONTO THE PROPERTY TAXES.
AND BECAUSE OF WHERE THIS IS AND THE NET WORTH OF THAT PROPERTY TO BEGIN WITH, THE TAXES ARE PROBABLY ALREADY OWED ON IT OR MORE THAN WHAT THE PROPERTY'S WORTH IN ALL LIKELIHOOD.
SO, AND WE DON'T WANT, THAT'S NOT A PROPERTY THAT I'M INTERESTED IN THE CITY TAKING POSSESSION OF AND TEARING DOWN BECAUSE OF WHAT I'M AFRAID WE MIGHT FIND INSIDE AS FAR AS THE CONDITION OF THE PROPERTY AND THE SANITARY CONDITIONS AND SO FORTH.
SO WE'RE GOING TO CONTINUE TO CLEAN IT UP UNTIL SUCH A TIME AS IS GOES AWAY NATURALLY, IF, IF YOU UNDERSTAND WHAT I MEAN.
AND GIVING THE AMOUNT BACK PROPERTY TAXES IS, IS ANY LIKELIHOOD THE COUNTY MIGHT FORECLOSE ON IT EVENTUALLY? UM, I, WE COULD PROBABLY HAVE IT REEVALUATED ON THOUGH.
I'M GUESSING THE PROPERTY SINCE IT'S BEEN IN THIS RELATIVE CONDITION FOR YEARS, AS LONG AS I'VE WORKED HERE THAT IT'S PROBABLY, I WOULD IMAGINE THE TAXES AT LEAST EQUAL OR OUTWEIGH.
I'D HAVE TO LOOK THROUGH THE FOLDER HERE.
THE, THE TAX RECORDS ARE IN YOUR, IN YOUR REPORTS.
BUT, UH, IT, IT MAY BE SOMETHING WE WANNA LOOK AT IN THE FUTURE.
SO THERE ABOUT 10 K LESS THAN THE AUDITOR'S VALUE LOOKS LIKE.
SO MY GUESS IS THAT THE AUDITOR WENT BY THERE AND LOOKED AT IT RIGHT NOW, I DON'T KNOW IF THE CONDITION ON THE OUTSIDE WOULD MAKE A DIFFERENCE.
PROBABLY THE CLUTTER PROBABLY WOULD NOT MAKE A DIFFERENCE AT THE PROPERTY VALUE.
IT WOULD BE A MATTER OF IF IT HAD, YOU KNOW, IF THE, IF IT HAD BEEN PARTIALLY BURNED, SOMETHING LIKE THAT, THAT REALLY MADE IT UNLIVABLE.
YOU DON'T DO ANYTHING WITH LIKE, UH, I KNOW YOU AS FAR AS EVADING THE PROPERTY, YOU GO AND REMOVE ALL THE JUNK AND STUFF THAT'S IN THE YARD.
DO ANYTHING ABOUT CLEANING THE HOUSE, THE FRONT OF THE HOUSE, WASHING IT DOWN FROM THE MOLD OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT? OR IS THAT THE OWNER'S RESPONSIBILITY? I MEAN AS FAR AS I'M CONCERNED, THAT'S THE OWNER'S RESPONSIBILITY.
UM, AT THIS POINT IN THIS SITUATION, GETTING THE YARD CLEANED UP AND GETTING ALL THE JUNK REMOVED, UH, IS I THINK WHAT A PRIORITY SHOULD BE.
IT'S NOT SAYING WE COULDN'T SPRAY DOWN THE HOUSE WITH, UM, A DETERRENT THAT WOULD KILL IT.
SIM YOU KNOW, SOMETHING THAT WILL JUST EVENTUALLY CAUSE ALL THE STUFF TO DIE.
BUT, BUT CLEANING OR SPRAYING A HOUSE IS SOMETHING I'M NOT SURE THE CITY'S I GOT.
IT IS, YOU KNOW WHAT I MEAN? YEAH, YEAH.
I WAS JUST CURIOUS IF NEVER BEEN DONE, BUT NOT TO MY KNOWLEDGE.
I NOTICED ONE OF THE, UH, GUTTERS LIKE IT'S HANGING.
IS THAT INCLUDED IN THIS OR IS THIS JUST THE JUNK? UM, I THINK THAT WE BETTER LEAVE THAT.
THAT'S CERTAINLY NOT THE WORST OF THE PROBLEMS OF THAT PROPERTY.
MY, MY PRIMARY CONCERN, THE IMPACT THIS IS HAVING ON THE NEIGHBORS 'CAUSE THEY'VE BEEN LIVING AROUND THIS GENTLEMAN FOR YEARS.
EVERYBODY KNOWS HIM IS GETTING THE YARD CLEANED UP AGAIN.
[00:30:02]
COOL.ANYBODY ELSE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, COMMENTS? ALRIGHT, ENTERTAIN A MOTION PLEASE.
I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO DECLARE THE PROPERTY NEW SINCE AND HAVE THE CT CONTRACTOR ABATE IT.
MOTION CARRIES PMRB CASE 25 DASH 31.
UH, NEXT CASE IS PMRB CASE 25 DASH 32.
THE PROPERTY OWNER ISHA JONES IS IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 1313 OF THE PROPERTY MAINTENANCE CODE.
THAT PROPERTY LOCATED AT 61 33 FAULKLAND AVENUE ANSWER THE PROPERTY AT 61 33.
FAULKLAND DRIVE IS IN VIOLATION OF CITY CODE AS IT PERTAINS TO MAINTENANCE OF GUTTERS AND DOWNSPOUTS.
THE ENTIRE FRONT SECTION OF SPOUTING HAS BECOME DISCONNECTED FROM THE HOUSE AND MUST BE REPAIRED OR REMOVED.
SPOUTING IS NOT A REQUIREMENT, BUT IF INSTALLED IT MUST BE PROPERTY MAINTAINED.
SECTION 13 13 0 4 STATES THE EXTERIOR OF A STRUCTURE SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN GOOD REPAIR, STRUCTURALLY SOUND AND SANITARY.
SO AS NOT TO POSE A THREAT TO THE PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY OR WELFARE.
THE OWNER SHALL KEEP THE EXTERIOR OF ALL PREMISES AND EVERY STRUCTURE THERE ON IN GOOD REPAIR.
ALL EXTERIOR SURFACES SHALL BE MAINTAINED FREE OF CONDITIONS, REFLECTIVE OF DETERIORATION OR INADEQUATE MAINTENANCE INSPECTION.
VERIFIES THE PROPERTY DOES NOT MEET THE STANDARDS SET FORTH IN THE CODE.
THEREFORE THE PROPERTY IS IN VIOLATION.
YOU ATTACH CASE REVIEW ILLUSTRATES THE VIOLATION PROCESS AND NON-COMPLIANCE OF THE PROPERTY.
THE ATTACHED PHOTO SHOWS NEGLIGENCE AND DETERIORATION.
CITY ZONING LETTERS MAILED TO THE OWNER RECORD HAVE NOT BEEN RETURNED.
THERE HAS BEEN NO COMMUNICATION FROM THE OWNER TO THE CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICE.
THE TAX RECORD SHOWS PROPERTY TAXES ARE TRADITIONALLY PAID.
IF DECLARED A NUISANCE BY THE BOARD, THE PROPERTY WILL BE ABATED BY THE CI BY THE CITY.
ANY COSTS INCURRED BY THE CITY WILL BE INVOICED TO THE PROPERTY OWNER.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS THE BOARD DECLARE THE PROPERTY A NUISANCE.
THE BOARD ORDER STAFF TO HAVE THE CITY ABATE TO THE PROPERTY.
IF SO, ORDER, THE CITY WILL BRING THE PROPERTY INTO COMPLIANCE BY REMOVAL OF THE NUISANCE.
THE CITY'S CONTRACTOR WILL MAKE THE REPAIR NEEDED TO REATTACH THE SPOUTING.
WE'RE NOT GOING TO REMOVE IT, WE'RE GOING TO REATTACH IT.
QUESTIONS? ANYONE? WE HAVE A MOTION PLEASE.
I MOVE THE THIRD PROPERTY OF NUISANCE AND HAVE STAFF ABATE IT.
I'LL SECOND THAT AND A VOTE PLEASE.
AND I SEE WE DON'T HAVE ANY ADDITIONAL BUSINESS FOR TONIGHT.
AND WITHOUT OBJECTION, THE MINUTES OF JULY THE 10TH, 2025 PMR BEATING PMR BEATING MEETING IS APPROVED.
SO I GUESS OUR NEXT MEETING THEN IS OCT OR NOVEMBER THE 13TH.
SO I CAN TELL YOU THAT THE NOVEMBER MEETING WILL STILL BE HERE AT THIS CITY HALL.
THE DECEMBER MEETING WILL PROBABLY BE AT THE NEW BUILDING, BUT THAT'S NOT CONFIRMED JUST YET.
THEY ARE SCHEDULING LIKE AN OPEN HOUSE.
THAT'S GONNA BE A LITTLE BIT BEFORE THAT.
SO IN NOVEMBER? UH IN DECEMBER.
SO WE'RE ALL GETTING KIND OF EXCITED.
I'M READY TO, WILL WE BE THE FIRST BOARD TO MEET THERE? OF COURSE NOT.
UM, COUNCIL WILL BE THE FIRST.
CEREMONIAL MEETING WITH CITY COUNCIL.
I'M SURE COUNCIL WILL BE FIRST.
UM, BZA USUALLY MEETS BEFORE YOU GUYS DO, BUT THEY MEET BEFORE COUNCIL ALSO SO THEY'LL GET MISSED.
SO IT MIGHT BE YOU GUYS AFTER COUNCIL.
THAT'S WHEN THE OPEN HOUSE IS GONNA BE AT.
I THINK THE OPEN HOUSE IS THE NINTH.
NO, BUT THEY'RE SUPPOSED TO BE GETTING SOMETHING OUT.
ANYTHING ELSE? IF NOT, I'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO ADJOURN.
DO WE ADJOURN? WE ARE SO ADJOURNED.