[00:00:02]
[ AGENDA PROPERTY MAINTENANCE REVIEW BOARD City Hall - Council Chambers 6131 Taylorsville Road September 12, 2024 6:30 P.M.]
SET? YEP.I'D LIKE TO CALL THE MEETING AS CITY HUBER HEIGHTS PROPERTY MAINTENANCE REVIEW BOARD ORDER PLEASE.
MADAM SECRETARY, WOULD YOU CALL THE ROLE? ALRIGHT, MS. KROMER? HERE.
UH, SO WE NEED A MOTION TO APPROVE TONIGHT'S AGENDA.
ANYBODY WANNA MAKE A MOTION? I'LL MAKE A MOTION.
ALRIGHT, ARE THERE ANY OBJECTIONS, TONIGHT'S AGENDA, IF NOT TONIGHT'S, UH, AGENDA IS APPROVED AND WE'RE GOING ON TO SWEARING IN THE WITNESSES.
UH, SIR, ARE YOU HERE TO SPEAK, UH, ON BEHALF OF A CASE? YES.
I NEED FOR YOU TO STAND AND, UH, I'M GONNA SWEAR YOU IN.
AND, UH, DO YOU HEREBY SWEAR OR AFFIRM ON A THREAT OF PERJURY TO TELL THE TRUTH, THE WHOLE TRUTH, AND NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH? YES, I DO.
I NEED TO GET HIM TO COME TO THE PODIUM OR WAIT TILL HIS CASE WHITE HOLD WHAT HIS CASE IS CALLED.
ALRIGHT, SO MOVING RIGHT ALONG.
UH, PENDING BUSINESS, WE HAVE NONE.
DID I PASS THAT? I DID START OVER HERE.
PENDING BUSINESS, WE HAVE NONE.
SO WE'LL GO RIGHT INTO TONIGHT'S CASES.
UH, WE'LL START WITH PMRB CASE 24 DASH 32.
UM, THE PROPERTY OWNER ERIC MCCOY, IS IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 1313.
UH, THE PROPERTY MAINTENANCE CODE AT PROPERTY LOCATED AT 46.
GOOD TO SEE YOU ALL ARE HERE AND IN GOOD HEALTH PRESUMABLY.
UM, THE ADDRESS 45 65 CORNER DRIVE IS A RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY AS ALL OUR, ALL, ALL OF THE SURROUNDING PROPERTIES ARE, UM, PROPERTIES IN VIOLATION OF CITY CODE AS IT PERTAINS TO JUNK STORAGE AND LANDSCAPING AND LAWN CARE.
THERE IS BOTH SUBSTANTIAL OVERGROWTH AND JUNK THROUGHOUT THE PROPERTY.
THE APPLICABLE ZONING CODE SECTIONS ARE AS FOLLOWS.
SECTION 13 13 0 4 H FOUR LANDSCAPING ALONG REQUIRES ALL LANDSCAPING TO BE MAINTAINED SO AS NOT TO BECOME OVERGROWN AND UNSIGHTLY REVIS TO THE GENERAL PUBLIC SECTION 13 13 0 4 H SIX OF THE OUTDOOR USE IN STORAGE CODE REQUIRES JUNK ITEMS TO BE STORED IN AN ENCLOSED STRUCTURE BUT NEVER OUTSIDE ON A PROPERTY INSPECTION.
VERIFIES THE PROPERTY DOES NOT MEET THE STANDARDS SET FORTH IN THE CODE, THEREFORE THE PROPERTY IS IN VIOLATION.
YOUR ATTACHED CASE REVIEW ILLUSTRATES THE VIOLATION PROCESS AND NON-COMPLIANCE OF THE PROPERTY.
CITY ZONING LETTERS MAILED TO THE OWNER OF RECORD HAVE NOT BEEN RETURNED AND THERE HAS BEEN NO COMMUNICATION TO THE CODE FOR CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICE FROM THE PROPERTY OWNER.
TO OUR KNOWLEDGE, THE PROPERTY IS AND HAS BEEN OCCUPIED DURING THE VIOLATION PROCESS.
IN FACT, ACCORDING TO THE VIOLATION CASE REPORT, THE RESIDENT WAS PRESENT AT ONE TIME AND GRANTED THE INSPECTOR PERMISSION TO ENTER THE BACKYARD.
TAX RECORDS SHOW PROPERTY TAXES ARE TRADITIONALLY PAID.
ALL FEES ASSOCIATED WITH WORK ORDERED BY THIS BOARD WILL BE INVOICED TO THE OWNER FOR PAYMENT.
IF PAYMENT IS NOT RECEIVED, THOSE FEES WILL BE ASSESSED TO THE PROPERTY TAXES.
STAFF RECOMMENDS THE PROPERTY DE THE BOARD DECLARE THE PROPERTY A NUISANCE AND THE BOARD ORDERS STAFF TO HAVE THE CITY CONTRACTOR ABATE THE PROPERTY.
IF SO ORDERED, THE CITY CONTRACTOR WILL BRING THE PROPERTY INTO COMPLIANCE BY REMOVAL OF THE NUISANCE.
ANYONE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS? ARE THERE TWO VEHICLES ON THE PROPERTY THAT ARE INOPERABLE? IS IT A TRUCK AND A I I DON'T KNOW.
THAT'S NOT PART OF THIS VIOLATION, SO I CAN'T SPEAK TO THAT.
HAS THERE BEEN ANY PROGRESS OR IMPROVEMENT ON ANY OF THE JUNK ITEMS? NOT TO MY, NOT TO OUR KNOWLEDGE AND, AND REALIZING THAT UNLESS WE RECEIVE A CALL FROM A PROPERTY OWNER, ONCE THE CASE IS SUBMITTED TO ME BY THE ZONING OFFICER, THEY'RE NOT COMPELLED TO RETURN.
I TELL THEM ONCE YOU GIVE IT TO ME, YOU DON'T NEED TO GO BACK UNLESS WE NEED TO VERIFY AFTER RECEIVING A CALL FROM THE OWNER THAT THERE HAS BEEN IMPROVEMENT TO, AS FAR AS I'M CONCERNED, THERE'S BEEN NO IMPROVEMENT.
[00:05:01]
ANYONE TO HAVE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? SIR, THIS IS NOT THE CASE FOR YOU.UH, JUST WANNA MAKE SURE, UH, I'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION.
I'LL MAKE A MOTION THAT WE DECLARE THE PROPERTY OF NUISANCE AND HAVE THE CITY ABATE IT.
AND DO YOU HAVE A VOTE PLEASE? MR. KROMER? YES.
SO MOTION CARRIES FOR PMRB CASE 24 DASH 32.
NEXT CASE ON THE AGENDA IS PMRB CASE 24 DASH 33.
THE PROPERTY OWNER VICKY SUE HOLDMAN, IS IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 1193 OF THE PROPERTY MAINTENANCE CODE.
IS THAT A TYPO? NO, THERE'S TWO SECTIONS OF CODE TWO CODES STATED THERE.
HAVEN'T SEEN THAT ONE IN A WHILE.
UH UH, VICKY SUE HOLMAN IS IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 1193.
UH, THE PROPERTY MAINTENANCES CODE OF PROPERTY LOCATED AT 76 11 STOCKHOLM DRIVE.
NOW MR. CHAIRMAN, THIS IS A RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY AS ARE THE SURROUNDING PROPERTIES.
AND THERE THE, THERE ARE TWO APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF CODE AND YOU'RE CORRECT.
YOU HAVEN'T SEEN 11 93 0 2, WHICH IS A RESIDENTIAL PARKING VIOLATION, WHICH WOULD NORMALLY HAVE BEEN IN THE COURSE OF THE LAST 15 YEARS, BEEN HANDLED THROUGH THE COURTS.
HOWEVER, WE ARE NO LONGER HANDLING THAT THROUGH THE COURT.
WE'VE INCORPORATED INTO 13 13 0 4 H SEVEN AND OUR OUTDOOR STORAGE AND USE CODE, THE REQUIREMENT THAT ALL VEHICLES ON PROPERTY BE OPERABLE AND LICENSED.
HAVING SAID THAT, THE PROPERTY IS IN VIOLATION OF CITY CODE AS IT PERTAINS TO OUTDOOR STORAGE OF AN UNLICENSED INOPERATIVE VEHICLE.
THE VEHICLE LICENSE PLATES ARE SEVEN YEARS OLD AND THE VEHICLES BEING STRICTLY USED FOR STORAGE, INCLUDING THE CAB AND THE COVERED BED APPLICABLE ZONING CODE SECTIONS ARE AS FOLLOWS.
SECTION 11 93 0 2 OFF STREET PARKING AND RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS REQUIRES ALL VEHICLES STORED OUTSIDE TO BE LICENSED AND OPERATIVE.
OUTDOOR STORAGE AND USE REQUIRES ANY MOTOR VEHICLE STORED OUTSIDE OF AN ENCLOSED BUILDING TO BE OPERATIVE, WHICH REQUIRES A VALID REGISTRATION DISPLAYED ON SET VEHICLE.
THOSE SOUND ALMOST IDENTICAL BUT BECAUSE ONE'S IN THE PROPERTY MAINTENANCE CODE, THAT'S WHAT THE DS IS INSPECTION VERIFIES THE PROPERTY DOES NOT MEET THE STANDARDS SET FORTH IN THE CODE, THEREFORE THE PROPERTY IS IN VIOLATION.
YOUR ATTACHED CASE REVIEW ILLUSTRATES THE VIOLATION PROCESS AND NON-COMPLIANCE OF THE PROPERTY CITY'S ZONING LETTERS.
MAIL TO THE OWNER OF RECORD HAVE NOT BEEN RETURNED AND THERE HAS BEEN NO COMMUNICATION TO THE CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER FROM THE PROPERTY OWNER.
IT IS OUR OPINION THAT THE PROPERTY IS UNOCCUPIED JUDGING BY ITS APPEARANCE AND MONITORING OF THE PROPERTY.
ALSO, VEO WATER RECORDS ZERO WATER USAGE AT THE PROPERTY.
THE TAX RECORD SHOWS PROPERTY TAXES ARE CURRENTLY PAID IN FULL.
AND AS OF DATE, THIS REPORT, THERE WILL BE NO FEES CHARGED DIRECTLY FOR REMOVAL AND STORAGE.
THE CITY HAS A TOWING CONTRACT WITH A LOCAL TOWING COMPANY AND REMOVALS INTERIM POUNDING ARE PART AND PARCEL OF THAT CONTRACT.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS THE BOARD DECLARE THE PROPERTY A NUISANCE AND THE BOARD ORDERS STAFF TO HAVE THE CITY CONTRACTOR ABATE THE PROPERTY.
THE CITY CONTRACT WILL BE A PROPERTY INCOME INCOME COMPLIANCE BY REMOVAL OF THE NU USAGE, WHICH MEANS WE WILL TOW IT.
HOLLIS TOWING HAS OUR TOWING CONTRACT AND THEY WILL IMPOUND THE VEHICLE.
IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER 'EM.
SO ALL WE REALLY HAVE TO DO IS, UH, DECLARE IT A NUISANCE AND HAVE THE PROPERTY ABATED AND THAT TAKES CARE OF THAT PART OF IT.
'CAUSE WE'VE GIVEN THE PROPERTY OWNER MORE THAN 30 DAYS TO CONTACT US, ASK FOR AN APPEAL, WHICH THEY COULD HAVE DONE BEFORE THIS BOARD.
WE'VE HEARD NOTHING FROM THEM THAT THAT AND I THINK THERE WAS A COPY OF THE TAG.
WE HAVE TAGS WE'RE GONNA TAG THESE CARS WITH THAT WE'RE GOING TO BE DOING AND UH, WE'RE AT THE POINT NOW WHERE IT'S GONE.
AS SOON AS SOON AS YOU ORDER US TO ABATE IT, I'LL CONTACT HOLS TOWING NEXT WEEK AND HAVE IT REMOVED.
ANYONE ELSE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS? ENTERTAIN A MOTION PLEASE? ANYONE ASKING? ANYONE? NO HONOR.
CAN, CAN YOU TELL ME WHAT ADDRESS
[00:10:01]
YOU'RE HERE FOR? THAT WAY? 8 3 5 6 TROY, THAT WAY WE'LL QUIT ASKING YOU.TO ENTERTAIN A MOTION, PLEASE, I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO DECLARE THE PROPERTY A NUISANCE AND HAVE THE CITY ABATE IT.
SO MOTION CARRIES FOR PMRB CASE 24 DASH 33.
UH, NEXT CASE ON THE AGENDA IS PMRB CASE 24 DASH 34.
PROPERTY OWNER TYLER MILLS IS IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 1313 OF THE PROPERTY MAINTENANCE CODE, UH, PROPERTY LOCATED AT 63 64 ROLLING GLEN DRIVE.
AND MR. CHAIRMAN, THIS PROPERTY HAS BECOME COMPLIANT.
I RECEIVED A CALL YESTERDAY FROM THE APPLICANT WHO AFTER IGNORING OUR ZOOM LETTERS, GOT HER NOTICE TO APPEAR, DECIDED IT WAS TIME TO GET RID OF THE OLD BED THAT WAS LEANING UP AGAINST THE SIDE OF THE HOUSE.
SO I HAD THAT VERIFIED BY AN OFFICER YESTERDAY.
SO I'M REQUESTING DISMISSAL BECAUSE THE PROPERTY IS NOW COMPLIANT.
ALRIGHT, WE HAVE A MOTION TO DISMISS PLEASE.
THERE'S THE PICTURE SHOWING THAT IT'S BEEN TAKEN CARE OF.
SO MOTION CARRIES FOR PMRB CASE 24 DASH 34 AND NEXT CASE BE DISMISSED.
OH, TO BE, TO BE MAN, I CAN'T TALK TO HIM TO BE DISMISSED.
NEXT CASE IS PMRB CASE 24 DASH 35.
THE PROPERTY OWNER FRED MEYER, IS IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 1313 OF THE PROPERTY MAINTENANCE CODE AT PROPERTY LOCATED AT 57 73 BALKINS ROAD.
AND YOU, EXCUSE ME FOR A MOMENT, I HAVE TO PULL UP MY STAFF REPORT 'CAUSE IT'S NOT IN THIS FOLDER, BUT I HAVE IT HERE IN PRINT.
YOU FOLKS MAY RECOGNIZE THIS PROPERTY FROM LAST YEAR WHEN YOU ORDERED IT COMPLETELY CLEANED UP, UH, PROPERTY AT 57 73 BOTKINS ROAD IS RESIDENTIAL AS ALL OUR SURROUNDING PROPERTIES PROPERTY'S IN VIOLATION OF CITY CODE.
AS IT PERTAINS TO LANDSCAPING AND LAWN CARE.
THERE IS SUBSTANTIAL OVERGROWTH THROUGHOUT THE PROPERTY.
THE PROPERTY HAS BEEN VACANT FOR YEARS AND PREVIOUSLY O ORDERED BY THIS BOARD TO BE ABATED.
SECTION 13 13 0 4 H FOUR LANDSCAPING AND LAWN REQUIRES ALL LANDSCAPING TO BE MAINTAINED SO AS NOT TO BECOME OVERGROWN AND UNSIGHTLY WERE VISIBLE TO THE GENERAL PUBLIC INSPECTION.
VERIFIES THE PROPERTY DOES NOT MEET THE STANDARDS SET FORTH IN THE CODE, THEREFORE THE PROPERTY'S IN VIOLATION.
YOUR ATTACHED CASE REVIEW ILLUSTRATES THE VIOLATION PROCESS AND NON-COMPLIANCE OF THE PROPERTY.
CITY'S ZONING LETTERS MAILED TO THE OWNER OF RECORD HAVE NOT BEEN RETURNED AND THERE HAS BEEN NO COMMUNICATION TO THE CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICE FROM THE PROPERTY OWNER.
THE PROPERTY HAS BEEN VACANT FOR YEARS.
IF ABATEMENT IS ORDERED, I WILL HAVE ALL BUSHES AND PLANTS TAKEN DOWN TO GROUND LEVEL.
ALL VINES WILL BE CUT AT THE BASE TO KILL THE EXISTING GROWTH AND REMOVE.
AS LONG AS REMOVAL DOES NOT DAMAGE THE HOUSE, THE TREE IN THE FRONT YARD WILL BE DEAD LIMBED TO PREVENT FURTHER DAMAGE WE RECEIVED.
AND WHAT TURNED US ONTO THIS AGAIN WAS WE RECEIVED, UM, NOTIFICATION THAT AFTER A STORM, A LARGE LIMIT FALLING ONTO THE SIDEWALK, NEIGHBORS WERE GOOD ENOUGH TO GO OVER AND DRAG IT OFF THE SIDEWALK.
SO WHAT WE'VE DECIDED TO DO IS THAT TREE THAT'S KIND OF GIRDLED BY OVERGROWTH, THERE'S A LOT OF DEAD LIMBS IN IT, WE'RE GOING TO HAVE THAT DEAD LIMB TO GET RID OF ALL THOSE DEAD LIMBS.
AND THEN OF COURSE WE'LL HAVE EVERYTHING REMOVED FROM THE PROPERTY ONCE THE TRIMMING IS DONE.
THE TAX RECORDS SHOWS PROPERTY TAXES ARE TRADITIONALLY PAID.
ALL FEES ASSOCIATED WITH WORK ORDER BY THIS BOARD WILL BE BE INVOICED TO THE OWNER FOR PAYMENT.
UH, IF PAYMENT IS NOT RECEIVED, THOSE FEES WILL BE ASSESSED TO PROPERTY TAXES.
[00:15:01]
AND WE'VE ALSO RECENTLY BEEN TOLD BY A NEIGHBOR THAT MR. LIZ MEYER IS GONNA MOVE BACK IN.WE THOUGHT MR. LIZ AND I ARE HAD GONE OVER THE RAINBOW.
UM, EVIDENTLY THAT'S NOT THE CASE.
SO WE'LL LOOK FORWARD TO SEEING WHO GETS THERE FIRST.
BUT IF WE GET THERE FIRST, HE'LL COME BACK TO A HOUSE THAT'S BEEN SUBSTANTIALLY CLEANED UP.
UH, STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS THE BOARD DECLARE THE PROPERTY A NUISANCE? THE BOARD ORDERS STAFF TO HAVE THE CITY CONTRACTOR ABATE THE PROPERTY.
IF SO ORDERED, THE CITY CONTRACTOR WILL BRING THE PROPERTY INTO COMPLIANCE BY REMOVAL OF THE NUISANCE.
I CAN ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS IF YOU HAVE.
ANYONE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS? PRETTY THOROUGH.
I MOVE THE PROPERTY OF NUISANCE AND HAVE THIS STAFF ABATE IT.
SO MOTION CARRIES FOR PMRB CASE 24 DASH 35.
NEXT CASE ON THE AGENDA IS PMRB CASE 24 DASH 36.
UH, THE PROPERTY OWNER, TANISHA MOR, IS IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 1313 OF THE PROPERTY MAINTENANCE CODE AT PROPERTY LOCATED AT 67 21 DEER MEADOWS DRIVE.
MR. CHAIRMAN, THIS IS A RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY AS ARE ALL THE SURROUNDING PROPERTIES.
THE PROPERTY IN VIOLATION OF CITY CODE AS IT PERTAINS TO ROOF AND SOFFIT REPAIRS.
THERE'S DISCONNECTED SOFF WITH EVIDENCE OF ANIMAL INTRUSION INTO THE ROOF.
SECTION 13 13 0 4 H ONE ROOF AND SOFFIT REPAIRS REQUIRES ALL ROOFING AND EXTERIOR CLADDING COMPONENTS TO BE PROPERLY MAINTAINED TO PREVENT.
AMONG OTHER THINGS, WEATHER AND ANIMAL INTRUSION INSPECTION VERIFIES THE PROPERTY DOES NOT MEET THE STANDARDS SET FORTH IN THE CODE, THEREFORE THE PROPERTY IS IN VIOLATION.
CITY ZONING LETTERS MAILED TO A LOAD OF RECORD HAVE NOT BEEN RETURNED AND THERE HAS BEEN NO COMMUNICATION TO THE CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICE FROM THE PROPERTY OWNER.
TO OUR KNOWLEDGE, THE PROPERTY IS AND HAS BEEN VACANT DURING THE VIOLATION PROCESS.
A VOICEMAIL LEFT FOR THE LISTED OWNER BY ME WENT UNANSWERED.
THE TAX RECORD SHOWS PROPERTY TAXES ARE TRADITIONALLY PAID.
ALL FEES ASSOCIATED WITH WORK ORDERED BY THIS BOARD WILL BE INVOICED TO THE OWNER FOR PAYMENT.
IF PAYMENT IS NOT RECEIVED, THOSE FEES WILL BE ASSESSED TO PROPERTY TAXES.
STAFF RECOMMENDS THE BOARD DECLARE THEIR PROPERTY A NUISANCE AND THE BOARD ORDERS STAFF TO HAVE THE CITY CONTRACTOR ABATE THE PROPERTY.
IF SO ORDERED, THE CITY CONTRACTOR WILL BRING THE PROPERTY INTO COMPLIANCE BY REMOVAL OF THE NUISANCE.
IN THIS CASE, WE WILL REPLACE REPLACE THE DAMAGE SOFTENING.
ANY QUESTIONS? I'LL HAVE AN ANSWER.
DO YOU KNOW IF THERE ARE ANY CRITTERS IN THE CEILING? I BET THERE ARE.
WILL THEY CHECK TO SEE IF THERE ARE ANY BEFORE THEY CLOSE IT UP? NO.
UM, WE DON'T DO ANIMAL CONTROL.
UH, THE OWNER IS AWARE OF THE SITUATION AS OF THE VOICEMAIL I LEFT FOR THE OWNER.
UM, AND IF THERE'S ANIMALS IN THERE, THEY'LL GET OUT.
'CAUSE THIS IS, THIS IS, YOU KNOW, NOT TRANS SOFTENING.
THIS IS THEY GOT IN, THEY'RE GONNA GET BACK OUT.
BUT WE'VE GOT TO DO THE REPAIR.
IT'S THE OWNER'S PREROGATIVE TO TAKE CARE OF ANIMAL REMOVAL.
SO I WOULDN'T BE SURPRISED IF WE'RE NOT BACK HERE AGAIN IN SIX MONTHS.
BUT MY GUY, 'CAUSE WHAT HE'S GONNA DO IS HE'S GOING TO, HE'LL PROBABLY REPLACE IT WITH LIKE SOFTENING.
IF THAT SOFTENING IS USABLE, HE'LL USE IT TO ENCLOSE IT.
UH, AND WE KNOW HOW, ESPECIALLY RACCOONS ARE, THEY WILL GET BACK IN IF THEY WANT TO GET IN.
IF THEY'RE IN, THEY'LL GET OUT AND THEN THEY'LL GET BACK IN.
SO, WE'LL, WE'LL JUST CONTINUE TO WATCH IT.
ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? ANYONE YOU HAVE A MOTION PLEASE? I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO CLEAR THE PROPERTY A NUISANCE AND HAVE THE CITY ABATE IT.
SO MOTION CARRIES FOR PMRB CASE 24 DASH 36.
NEXT CASE ON THE AGENDA IS PMRB CASE 24 DASH 37.
THE PROPERTY OWNER SPEND AND STENT IS IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 1313 OF THE PROPERTY MAINTENANCE
[00:20:01]
CODE AND PROPERTY LOCATED AT 83 56 OLD TROY PIKE.NOW MR. CHAIRMAN, THIS, UH, PROPERTY IS ZONED L ONE OFFICE.
IT IS A VETERINARIAN'S OFFICE AND HOSPITAL.
UM, THE PROPERTY IS IN VIOLATION OF THE CITY CODE AS IT PERTAINS TO A MAINTENANCE OF AN ACCESSORY BUILDING.
SPECIFICALLY THE EXTERIOR CLADDING SECTION 13 13 0 4 H ONE REQUIRES THE EXTERIOR AND CONDITION OF ALL BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES SHALL BE MAINTAINED.
SO THE APPEARANCE THEREOF SHALL REFLECT THE LEVEL OF MAINTENANCE SO AS TO AVOID BLIGHTING EFFECTS AND HAZARDS TO HEALTH AND SAFETY INSPECTION.
VERIFIES THE PROPERTY DOES NOT MEET THE STANDARDS SET FORTH IN THE CODE, THEREFORE THE PROPERTY IS IN VIOLATION.
YOUR ATTACHED CASE REVIEW ILLUSTRATES THE VIOLATION PROCESS AND NON-COMPLIANCE OF THE PROPERTY.
CITY'S ZONING LETTERS MAILED TO THE OWNER OF RECORD HAVE NOT BEEN RETURNED AND THERE HAS BEEN NO COMMUNICATION TO THE CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICE FROM THE PROPERTY OWNER.
I WILL MODIFY THAT, THAT I DID RECEIVE, UH, VOICEMAIL FROM DR.
HU IN THE AUDIENCE AND I RETURNED IT.
LEFT HIM A VOICEMAIL, UH, TELLING HIM THAT HE NEEDED TO APPEAR BEFORE THE BOARD TO ASK FOR ANY TYPE OF AN EXTENSION OR ANYTHING.
SO I'LL, I'LL CORRECT THAT THE STAFF BOARD HAD BEEN, HAD BEEN WRITTEN ALREADY BEFORE I HEARD.
UM, THERE THAT RE TAX RECORDS SHOW TAXES ARE TRADITIONALLY PAID.
ALL FEES ASSOCIATED WORK ORDERED BY THIS BOARD WILL BE INVOICED TO THE OWNER FOR PAYMENT.
IF PAYMENT IS NOT RECEIVED, THOSE FEES WILL BE ASSESSED TO PROPERTY TAXES.
STAFF OF RECOMMENDATION IS THE BOARD DECLARE THE PROPERTY IN NUISANCE.
THE BOARD ORDERS STAFF TO HAVE THE CITY CONTRACTOR ABATE THE PROPERTY.
IF SO, ORDER, THE CITY CONTRACTOR WILL BRING THE PROPERTY INTO COMPLIANCE BY REMOVAL OF THE NUISANCE.
REMOVING THE NUISANCE IN THIS CASE WILL BE INSTALLATION OF THE PROPER CLADDING TO BREED THE BUILDING UP TO REQUIRED STANDARDS.
ALRIGHT SIR, DO YOU WANT TO, YEAH, SO I, I NEED YOU TO STEP TO THE PODIUM IF YOU WOULD PLEASE AND STATE AND SPELL YOUR NAME.
I'M SPIN ANSTAT, S-V-E-N-A-N-S-T-A-D-T.
I'M THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY AND THE BUSINESS OWNER TOO.
I'VE BEEN DRAGGING MY FEET FOR A HANDFUL OF REASONS THAT PROBABLY DON'T APPLY TO ANYTHING HERE.
UH, BUT I AM WORKING ON GETTING SOME THINGS DONE TO THIS TO, I'M, I'M TRYING TO DECIDE WHETHER I'M JUST GONNA ELIMINATE THE BUILDING OR FIX IT, WHICH I'D LIKE TO FIX IT.
BUT THE LAST PERSON THAT CAME IN, WHICH WAS ABOUT A MONTH AND A HALF AGO, TOLD ME THAT HE THOUGHT THE ENTIRE THING WOULD HAVE TO BE REPLACED, WHICH I KIND OF DISAGREE WITH.
SO I HAVE AN INSURANCE ADJUSTER AND ALSO I HAVE A, A REPRESENTATIVE OF CASTLE ROOFING.
GONNA TAKE A LOOK AT IT 'CAUSE IT'S, IT'S JUST PUSHED IN ABOUT A FOOT.
SO I DON'T KNOW WHAT HAPPENED.
I RETURNED TO WORK ONE MORNING AND THAT'S THE WAY IT LOOKED.
AND THEN I KIND OF LET IT SIT LIKE THAT.
I'M A BIT OF A PROCRASTINATOR.
I DID GET SOMEONE COME IN TO AT LEAST CLEAN IT UP A LITTLE BIT.
SO IT LOOKS NOT QUITE AS ALL THE, THE DEBRIS IS KIND OF GONE NOW.
BUT I WOULD LIKE TO GET IT REPAIRED BECAUSE IT'S, IT'S USEFUL TO ME FOR STORAGE VERSUS TEARING IT DOWN.
AND I GUESS I'M ASKING FOR AN EXTENSION SOME TIME.
I ALSO HAVE HAD A LOT OF FRUSTRATIONS 'CAUSE I OWN TWO BUSINESSES AND THIS HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THIS.
BUT EVER SINCE COVID, I'VE, I'VE, I JUST HAVE A TERRIBLE TIME GETTING PEOPLE TO SHOW UP TO DO ANYTHING.
UM, SO I'VE, I'VE PUT OUT QUITE A FEW CALLS AND I'VE ONLY HAD ONE PERSON ACTUALLY COME IN AND OUT OF DESPERATION.
I LIKE TO PAY FOR THESE THINGS MYSELF.
MY PHILOSOPHY ON INSURANCE IS TO AVOID USING IT FOR A BUNCH OF WEIRD REASONS, BUT I DO HAVE THE INSURANCE ADJUST COMING TO LOOK AT IT TOO.
ABOUT HOW LONG SINCE THIS GUY WANTED TO CHARGE ME SIX OR SEVEN GRAND TO FIX IT.
AND I, I, ME AND MY DAD USED TO FIX STUFF LIKE THAT.
JUST NEEDS PROPPED UP IN A NEW, A NEW WALL.
BUT IT IS SHOVED IN SO SOMEONE HIT IT.
I DON'T KNOW WHO, IT'S A RELATIVELY PERMANENT STRUCTURE.
IT HAS A VERY HEAVY DUTY, UH, CONCRETE FOUNDATION AND FLOOR.
IT'S PROBABLY BEEN THERE FOR OVER A HUNDRED YEARS.
WHOEVER HID IT, IT JUST CAVED THE WOOD IN THE WOOD'S KIND OF SOFT LIKE BALSA WOOD.
IT'S, IT'S VERY OLD, BUT THERE REALLY ISN'T THAT MUCH TO FIXING IT.
I DON'T THINK IT'S GOT A BRAND NEW ROOF BRAND.
ACTUALLY, IF A FEW BAD, PROBABLY ONE OF MY SNOWPLOW PEOPLE HIT IT OR SOMETHING.
BUT WHOEVER DID IT LEFT WITHOUT A NOTE ABOUT HOW LONG.
SO YEAH, I SHOULD HAVE GOTTEN THIS THIS LONG TIME AGO.
ABOUT HOW LONG AGO? A MONTH OR TWO MAYBE.
YOU CAN GIVE ME A DEADLINE IF YOU WISH, BUT I GOT TWO MORE PEOPLE LOOKING AT IT THIS WEEK.
I GOTTA GET THEM TO SHOW UP AND DO SOMETHING.
MR. CHAIRMAN, MAYBE I CAN GET YOUR ADVICE
[00:25:01]
ON SOMEONE TO CALL TO COME IF I MAY.UM, I WOULD SAY ASK FOR AS MUCH TIME AS YOU THINK YOU'RE GOING TO NEED.
IN OTHER WORDS, YOU'RE BETTER OFF ASKING FOR MORE TIME THAN YOU WIND UP MEETING THAN ASKING FOR LESS TIME AND HAVING HAVE TO ASK FOR.
WELL, I FEEL LIKE IT HAS TO BE DONE BEFORE THE WEATHER GETS COLD.
I, I, I'M FOR, UH, SUGGESTED 90 DAYS.
I'LL MAKE A MOTION FOR A 90 DAY EXTENSION.
SORRY, I'M GONNA REPEAT IT TO HIM.
SO, UH, WE'VE MADE A MOTION TO GIVE YOU AN EXTENSION FOR 90 DAYS AND IT'S BEEN SECONDED.
AND WOULD THAT BE ALL WITH YOU? YES.
ALRIGHT, SO NOW I'LL TAKE THE VOTE.
AND NOW WE'LL TAKE A VOTE ON THAT.
SO MOTION CARRIES FOR AN EXTENSION ON PMRB CASE 24 DASH 37.
THAT WOULD MAKE THE, UH, DUE DATE DECEMBER 12, TWO WEEKS BEFORE CHRISTMAS
SO HOPEFULLY IF GIVES YOU ENOUGH TIME IT SHOULD.
SANTA WILL BRING YOU NEW SHED OBJECTIONS ON PEOPLE LOOKING TO DO SOME WORK.
ALRIGHT, WE, WE APPRECIATE YOU.
SO OKAY FOR ME TO HEAD OUT? YEP.
NEXT CASE IS PMRB CASE 24 DASH 38.
AND THE PROPERTY OWNER, CYNTHIA SCOTT, IS IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 1313 OF THE PROPERTY MAINTENANCE CODE.
THAT PROPERTY LOCATED AT 46 91 POWELL ROAD.
SO WE'RE GOING TO SHOW YOU SOME RATHER SUBSTANTIAL BEFORE AND AFTER PICTURES OF THAT PROPERTY OF THE UPCOMING PROPERTY.
BY THE WAY, WE'RE GOING TO BE ASKING FOR A DISMISSAL.
YOU'LL SEE WHY, UH, IT WAS A VACANT PROPERTY.
UH, OWNER, DECEASED FAMILY HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH IT.
IT WAS BEING USED BY SQUATTERS.
IN FACT, I HAD TO HAVE THE DETACHED GARAGE OVERHEAD AND THE FRONT DOORS BOTH SECURED BY PADLOCKS BY OUR CONTRACTOR BECAUSE THIS SQUATTER.
SO YOU CAN SEE WHAT THE PROPERTY DID LOOK LIKE WHEN WE BROUGHT IT TO THE, TO WHEN WE PUT IT IN VIOLATION.
AND JERRY WILL GO THROUGH THE PHOTOS AND TELL YOU WHAT THE NEW SHOW YOU WHAT THE NEW OWNERS HAVE DONE.
SO THIS IS WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE NOW.
OF COURSE THE GRASS IS BROWN, BUT THEY CUT BUILDING, RIGHT? EVERYBODY'S THERE.
THE OTHER PICTURES LOOK REALLY GREEN, BUT THERE'S NOT MUCH THERE TO BE BROWN.
SO THEY EVEN REMOVED THE, UH, MAPLE TREE IN THE FRONT YARD.
THE NEW OWNERS, I'VE SPOKEN WITH THEM ON SITE, THEY'RE GOING TO COMPLETELY REHAB THE ENTIRE PROPERTY.
SO THAT'S A TREMENDOUS INVESTMENT BY THEM.
AND SO ANYWAY, AS A RESULT OF WHAT THEY HAVE DONE, WE'RE ASKING THE BOARD TO DISMISS THIS CASE.
I'LL MAKE A MOTION THAT WE DISMISS THE CASE.
SO MOTION CARRIES TO DISMISS PMRB CASE 24 DASH 37 OR I'M SORRY, 38.
ALRIGHT, SO MOVING RIGHT ALONG.
UH, NO ADDITIONAL BUSINESS WITH ANYONE? I HAVE NOTHING SIR.
AND UH, LET'S SEE, WITHOUT OBJECTION.
UH, ARE THERE ANY OBJECTION TO THE MINUTES OF AUGUST THE EIGHTH? IF THERE'S NOT, WE WILL CONSIDER THEM APPROVED.
NEXT UPCOMING MEETING IS SEPTEMBER THE 26TH AND I'LL LET YOU KNOW.
AND WITH THAT I WILL ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO ADJOURN.