[00:00:01]
ALRIGHT.I'D LIKE TO CALL THE MEETING OF THE CITY
[ AGENDA PROPERTY MAINTENANCE REVIEW BOARD City Hall - Council Chambers 6131 Taylorsville Road April 25, 2024 6:30 P.M.]
OF HUBER HEIGHTS PROPERTY MAINTENANCE REVIEW BOARD ORDER PLEASE.UH, MADAM SECRETARY, WE CALL THE ROLL.
UM, AND NOW I WILL BE MOVING ALONG WITH THE AGENDA HERE AND I TAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE.
UH, WITHOUT OBJECTION FOR THE MINUTES OF THE LAST MEETING, I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE FIRST WERE THE AGENDA.
GONNA MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE AGENDA.
UH, LET'S MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE AGENDA FOR THIS EVENING.
I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE.
WITHOUT OBJECTION THEN THE AGENDA FOR THE KNIGHT'S MEETING IS APPROVED.
THIS IS WHERE MR. C GRAVES YOU COME IN.
I NEED FOR YOU TO STAND AND RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND PLEASE.
ANYBODY THAT WISH TO SPEAK, UH, I NEED OR GIVE TESTIMONY, I NEED TO UM, HAVE YOU RESPOND.
TO THE FOLLOWING OATH, DO YOU HEREBY SWEAR OR AFFIRM ON THE THREAT OF PERJURY TO TELL THE TRUTH, THE WHOLE TRUTH, AND NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH SO HELP YOU GOD? YES, I DO.
ALRIGHT, SO IT LOOKS LIKE, UH, WE DON'T HAVE ANY PENDING BUSINESS AND WE'LL MOVE ON TO NEW BUSINESS.
UH, NEW BUSINESS WOULD BE OUR FIRST CASE, PMRB CASE 24 DASH 16.
UM, THE PROPERTY OWNER, JOSEPH DEWITT, IS IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 1313 OF THE PROPERTY MAINTENANCE CODE AT PROPERTY LOCATED AT 43 60 LONGFELLOW AVENUE.
THE PROPERTY AT 43 60 LONGFELLOW AVENUE IS IN VIOLATION OF THE CITY CODE REGARDING JUNK REMOVAL.
THERE IS JUNK ALONG THE SIDE OF THE GARAGE IN NEED OF REMOVAL.
SECTION 1313 0.04 H SIX C READS, ALL PERMISSIBLE ITEMS STORED OUTSIDE MUST BE IN GOOD CONDITION AND USABLE AS INTENDED BY THE MANUFACTURER.
NO SUCH ITEMS THAT ARE BROKEN, UM, DILAPIDATED OR DISREGARDED SHALL BE STORED OUTSIDE.
ORDINANCE 95 0 8 24 PAST 9 11 95 INSPECTION VERIFIES THAT THE PROPERTY DOES NOT MEET THE STANDARDS SET FORTH IN THE CODE.
THEREFORE, PROPERTY IS IN VIOLATION.
OUR ATTACHED CASE REVIEW ILLUSTRATES THE VIOLATION PROCESS AND NON-COMPLIANCE OF THE PROPERTY.
CITY ZONING LETTERS MAILED TO THE OWNER OF RECORD HAVE NOT BEEN RETURNED AND THERE HAS BEEN NO COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE OWNER TO THE CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICE.
TO OUR KNOWLEDGE, THE PROPERTY IS, THE PROPERTY IS AND HAS BEEN CONTINUALLY OCCUPIED.
THE TAX RECORD SHOWS THE PROPERTY TAXES ARE TYPICALLY PAID IN FULL.
ANY FEES CHARGED FOR THIS, UH, FOR THIS WORK, THE BOARD ORDERS WILL BE INVOICED TO THE PROPERTY IN THE OWNER'S NAME.
IF UNPAID, THE FEES WILL BE ASSESSED.
TWO PROPERTY TAXES, QUARTERLY STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS ARE, NUMBER ONE, THE BOARD DECLARE THE PROPERTY IN NUISANCE.
NUMBER TWO, THE BOARD OR ORDERS STAFF TO HAVE THE CITY CONTRACTOR ABATE THE PROPERTY.
IF SO ORDERED, THE CITY CONTRACTOR WILL BRING THE PROPERTY INTO COMPLIANCE.
YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS? ANYONE? HAS THERE BEEN ANY IMPROVEMENT AT ALL TO THE JUNK STORED AROUND THE PROPERTY? NO.
IF THERE ARE NO OTHER QUESTIONS, I ENTERTAIN A MOTION.
I'LL DECLARE, DECLARE THE PROPERTY OF NUISANCE AND HAVE A SECOND.
SO MOTION CARRIES FOR PMRB CASE 24 DASH 16.
NEXT CASE IS PMRB CASE 24 17 DASH 17.
[00:05:01]
THE PROPERTY OWNER, TIMOTHY TIMOTHY MASON, IS IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 1313 OF THE PROPERTY MAINTENANCE CODE AT PROPERTY LOCATED AT 52 50 HARSHMAN ROAD.GOD, THIS, I DON'T HAVE THE TIME HERE, MR. SEAGRAVES.
THE PROPERTY AT 52 50 HARSH MANVILLE ROAD IS IN VIOLATION OF THE CITY CODE REGARDING JUNK REMOVAL.
THERE IS A SUBSTANTIAL AMOUNT OF JUNK ACCUMULATED ON THE PROPERTY, ESPECIALLY IN THE BACKYARD, BUT ELSEWHERE ON THE PROPERTY AS WELL.
THE SHEER NUMBER OF THE ITEMS IN THE REAR OF THE HOUSE WOULD BE A SEVERE IMP UH, IMPEDIMENT FOR EMERGENCY SERVICES TO ACCESS THE HOME AS NEEDED.
THIS IS A REPEAT VIOLATION WITHIN TWO YEARS OF VIOLATION.
UH, 2 0 2 2 DASH 2 6 9, WHICH WAS OF THE SAME NATURE.
SECTION 1313 0.04 H SIX C READS, ALL PERMISSIBLE ITEMS STORED OUTSIDE MUST BE IN GOOD CONDITION AND USABLE AS INTENDED BY THE MANUFACTURER.
NO SUCH ITEMS THAT ARE BROKEN, DILAPIDATED, OR DISREGARDED SHALL BE STORED OUTSIDE.
ORDINANCE 95 DASH 0 8 2 4 PAST 9 11 95 INSPECTION VERIFIES THE PROPERTY DOES NOT MEET THE STANDARDS SET FORTH IN THE CODE.
THEREFORE, PROPERTY IS IN VIOLATION.
YOUR ATTACHED CASE REVIEW ILLUSTRATES THE VIOLATION PROCESS AND NON-COMPLIANCE OF THE PROPERTY CITY.
UH, ZONING LETTERS MAILED TO THE OWNER OF RECORD HAVE NOT BEEN RETURNED AND THERE HAS BEEN NO COMMUNICATION FROM THE OWNER TO THE CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICE.
WATER DEPARTMENT RECORDS INDICATE MINIMUM WATER USAGE OVER THE LAST FEW MONTHS, SO THE PROPERTY MAY BE UNOCCUPIED.
THE TAX RECORDS SHOW PROPERTY TAXES ARE TYPICALLY PAID IN FULL.
ANY FEES CHARGED FOR THE WORK THIS BOARD ORDERS WILL BE INVOICED TO THE PROPERTY AND THE OWNER'S NAME.
IF UNPAID, THE FEES WILL BE ASSESSED TO PROPERTY TAXES.
QUARTERLY STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS ARE, NUMBER ONE, THE BOARD DECLARE THE PROPERTY A NUISANCE.
NUMBER TWO, THE BOARD ORDERS STAFF TO HAVE THE CITY CONTRACTOR ABATE THE PROPERTY.
IF SO ORDERED, THE CITY CONTRACTOR WILL BRING THE PROPERTY IN TWO COMPLIANCE.
ANYONE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS? THE HOUSE ITSELF DOESN'T LOOK LIKE IT'S IN VERY GOOD SHAPE.
I THINK ONCE THEY GET IN THERE AND CLEAR ALL THAT OTHER STUFF OUT, IT'S PROBABLY HARD TO SEE EXACTLY WHAT IT IS UNTIL A LOT OF THAT STUFF IS GONE.
THE GUTTERS AROUND THE TOP, THE ROOFING, I MEAN, LOOKS LIKE THE GUTTERS ARE GONE AND JUST YEAH, THAT, SO I THINK THE MAIN PART OF THIS ONE WOULD BE TO JUST BE REMOVING TO JOHN, CORRECT? CORRECT.
ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? ANYONE? NO.
I MOVE FOR THE PROPERTY NUISANCE AND HAVE STAFF ABATE THE PROPERTY.
SO MOTION CARRIES FOR PMRB CASE 24 DASH 17.
NEXT CASE IS PMRB CASE 24 DASH 18.
THE PROPERTY OWNER DAVID DAVIS, IS IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 1313 OF THE PROPERTY MAINTENANCE CODE AT PROPERTY LOCATED AT 59 75 ROSALIE ROAD, MR. SEAGRAVES.
THERE IS A SUBSTANTIAL AMOUNT OF JUNK AND TRASH ALONG THE SIDE OF THE HOUSE AND IN THE BED OF A PICKUP TRUCK.
SECTION 1313 0.04 H SIX C READS ALL PERMISSIBLE ITEMS
[00:10:01]
STORED OUTSIDE MUST BE IN GOOD CONDITION AND USABLE AS IT'S IN INTENDED BY THE MANUFACTURER.NO SUCH ITEMS THAT ARE BROKEN, DILAPIDATED, OR DISREGARDED SHALL BE STORED OUTSIDE.
ORDINANCE 95 DASH OH DASH 8 24 PAST 9 11 95 INSPECTION VERIFIES THE PROPERTY DOES NOT MEET THE STANDARD SET FORTH IN THE CODE, THEREFORE PROPERTY IS IN VIOLATION.
YOUR ATTACHED CASE REVIEW ILLUSTRATES THE VIOLATION PROCESS AND NON-COMPLIANCE OF THE PROPERTY.
CITY'S ZONING LETTERS MAILED TO THE OWNER OF RECORD HAVE NOT BEEN RETURNED AND THERE HAS BEEN NO COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE OWNER TO THE CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICE.
TO OUR KNOWLEDGE, THE PROPERTY IS AND HAS BEEN CONTINUALLY OCCUPIED TAX.
THE TAX RECORDS SHOW PROPERTY TAXES ARE TYPICALLY PAID IN FULL.
ANY FEES CHARGED FOR WORK THIS PRO, THIS BOARD ORDERS WILL BE INVOICED TO THE PROPERTY IN THE OWNER'S NAME.
IF UNPAID, THE FEES WILL BE ASSESSED TO THE PROPERTY TAXES.
QUARTERLY STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS ARE, NUMBER ONE, THE BOARD DECLARE THE PROPERTY A NUISANCE.
NUMBER TWO, THE BOARD ORDERS STAFF TO HAVE THE CITY CONTRACTOR ABATE THE PROPERTY.
IF SO ORDERED, THE CITY CONTRACTOR WILL BRING THE PROPERTY INTO COMPLIANCE.
ANY QUESTIONS? WHAT IS THAT ONE ARTICLE ON THE RIGHT HAND SIDE? THE BIG THING IN THE BACK IS RIGHT HERE.
UH, THAT LOOKS LIKE A HORSE TRAILER.
SO THAT WOULD BE REMOVED AS WELL? UH, NO.
IS THE TRUCK IN OPERABLE? UH, THEY MAY OR MAY NOT HAVE THAT IN, IN VIOLATION.
IT WOULD NOT BE A PART OF THIS PARTICULAR OKAY.
THIS WOULD REMOVE THE STUFF OUT OF THE BED OF THE TRUCK AS WELL, CORRECT? UH, FROM HIS NOTES, YES.
AS FAR AS WE KNOW THAT THE TRUCK HAS NOT BEEN MOVED IN ANY FASHION AT ANY TIME RECENTLY? I DON'T THINK SO.
THIS ISN'T MY CODE BLOCK
BUT WE CANNOT MOVE, REMOVE THE TRUCK AS IN WITH A JUNK REMOVAL ORDER.
THAT'S NOT A VIOLATION FOR THE TRUCK TO BE PARKED ON THE SIDE OF THE HOUSE LIKE THAT.
UH, IF IT ISN'T ON A SOLID SURFACE, BUT THERE'S SO MUCH JUNK THERE.
WE'LL HAVE TO TAKE A LOOK AT THAT.
IS THE HOUSE VACANT? UM, IT SAID I THOUGHT IT WAS, IT WAS NOT.
ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? ALRIGHT, I HAVE A MOTION, PLEASE.
I MAKE A MOTION TO DECLARE THE PROPERTY A NUISANCE AND HAVE THE CITY ABATE IT.
SO MOTION CARRIES FOR PMRB CASE 24 18.
UM, I SEE WE DON'T HAVE ANY ADDITIONAL BUSINESS.
CORRECT? UM, AND IF THERE'S NO OBJECTION FOR THE MINUTES OF MARCH THE 28TH, I'LL APPROVE THE MINUTES FROM MARCH THE 28TH.
ALRIGHT, UH, UPCOMING MEETINGS IS THE NEXT ONE IS GONNA BE MAY THE 23RD.
MAY THE NINTH ONE HAS BEEN CANCELED.
SO I WILL NOW ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO ADJOURN.
DO WE ADJOURN? ALRIGHT, WE ARE SO ADJOURNED.