[00:00:01]
[ AGENDA PROPERTY MAINTENANCE REVIEW BOARD City Hall - Council Chambers 6131 Taylorsville Road January 25, 2024 6:30 P.M.]
LIKE TO CALL THE MEETING AS CITY HUBER HEIGHTS PROPERTY MAINTENANCE REVIEW BOARD TO ORDER PLEASE.MADAM SECRETARY, WILL YOU CALL THE ROLE? ALL RIGHT, MS. BALLARD? HERE.
AND MS. GRAY DID NOTIFY US, SO HER ABSENCE IS EXCUSED.
I NEED A MOTION TO APPROVE THE AGENDA.
I BELIEVE WE APPROVE THE AGENDA.
AND NO WILL CALL NO SECOND AND WITHOUT OBJECTION.
THE AGENDA FOR TONIGHT'S MEETING IS APPROVED.
I NEED TO SWEAR IN ANYBODY WISHING TO GIVE TESTIMONY THIS EVENING AND RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND PLEASE.
DO YOU HEREBY SWEAR OR AFFIRM ON THE THREAT OF PERJURY TO TELL THE TRUTH, THE WHOLE TRUTH, AND NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH, SO HELP YOU GOD? I DO.
ALRIGHT, SO I SEE WE HAVE PASSING HERE, UH, NO PENDING BUSINESS AND WE, WE'LL START RIGHT IN WITH THE NEW BUSINESS STARTING WITH, UM, PMRB CASE 24 DASH ZERO ONE.
PROPERTY OWNER TEKI AT INAL IS IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 1313 OF THE PROPERTY MAINTENANCE CODE AT PROPERTY, LOCATED AT 57 85 ROY PIKE.
HAPPY INTER UH, WAIT A MINUTE.
JUST WANNA SEE IF YOU WAS PAYING ATTENTION, RICHARD.
GLAD TO SEE EVERYBODY HERE AND WE'LL START OFF WITH FIRST STAFF REPORT THE PROPERTY AT 5 7 8 5 OLD TROY PIKE IS IN VIOLATION OF THE CITY'S CODE REGARDING OUTDOOR STORAGE AS WELL AS JUNK OR DEBRIS DEPOSITED ON THE REAR OF THE PROPERTY.
THE OWNER OF THE LAND IS ALLOWING DUMPED BUILDING MATERIALS TO REMAIN ON THE PROPERTY, DESPITE NUMEROUS WRITTEN AND VERBAL WARNINGS FROM THE CITY.
MEMBERS OF THE BOARD MAY RECOGNIZE THIS AS A FORMER SITE OF THE TALL TIMBERS INN.
THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED ADJACENT TO THE STOGIE SMOKE SHOP SECTION 13 13 0 5 C.
REGARDING REMOVAL OF MISCELLANEOUS DEBRIS READS ALL YARDS, QUARTS OR LOTS SHALL BE KEPT FREE OF UNSIGHTLY MATERIALS NOT APPROPRIATE TO THE AREA AND DEBRIS WHICH MAY CAUSE A FIRE HAZARD OR MAY ACT AS A BREEDING PLACE FOR VERMIN OR INSECTS.
ALL PREMISES SHALL BE REASONABLY FREE FROM WASTE PAPER AND OTHER TRASH AND DEBRIS.
YOUR ATTACHED INSPECTION, EXCUSE ME, INSPECTION, VERIFIES THE PROPERTIES DOES NOT MEET THE STANDARDS SET FORTH IN THE CODE.
THEREFORE, THE PROPERTY IS IN VIOLATION.
YOUR ATTACHED CASE REVIEW ILLUSTRATES THE VIOLATION PROCESSED AND NON-COMPLIANCE OF THE PROPERTY.
CITY'S ZONING LETTERS MAILED TO THE OWNER OF RECORD HAVE NOT BEEN RETURNED.
THERE HAS BEEN COMMUNICATION FROM THE OWNER TO THE CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICE WITH NO SATISFACTORY RESOLUTION.
THE TAX RECORD SHOWS PROPERTY TAXES ARE IN ARREARS, $13,709 AND 51 CENTS ON AN ANNUAL BILL OF $3,364.
ANY WORKED HIS BOARD ORDERS WILL BE INVOICED TO THE PROPERTY IN THE OWNER'S NAME.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS THE BOARD DECLARE THE PROPERTY A NUISANCE AND THE BOARD ORDERS STAFF TO HAVE THE CITY CONTRACTOR ABATE THE PROPERTY.
IF SO ORDERED, THE CONTRACTOR WILL REMOVE THE DEBRIS FROM THE PROPERTY AS SOON AS WHETHER CONDITIONS PERMIT.
I HAVE ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU MIGHT HAVE.
ANYONE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS SINCE THE PROPERTY TAXES HAVEN'T BEEN PAID? PROBABLY THE INDICATION THAT THIS WON'T BE PAID EITHER.
UM, I WOULD SAY THAT'S A SAFE BET.
UM, OR THERE AND BE, BEAR IN MIND, WE'LL GET THOSE TAXES BACK AT SOME POINT IN THE FUTURE AND WE BUDGET PLENTY OF MONEY TO, TO COVER THESE THINGS.
BUT YES, I WOULD SAY THAT UH, IT APPEARS THIS OWNER MAY HAVE SOME WISH TO DEVELOP THAT PROPERTY SOMEHOW BECAUSE HE HAS DONE A LOT OF GRADING OF THE PROPERTY TO MAKE IT DEVELOPABLE.
BUT I WOULD THINK BEFORE HE WOULD DO ANYTHING ELSE, HE WOULD BRING HIS PROPERTY TAXES OUT OF ARREARAGE.
ANYONE ELSE? YOU HAVE A MOTION? PLEASE DECLARE THE PROPERTY A NUISANCE AND HAVE STAFF ABATE IT.
[00:05:01]
YES.SO MOTION CARRIES FOR PMRB CASE 24 DASH ZERO ONE.
UH, NEXT CASE PMRB CASE 24 DASH ZERO TWO.
THE PROPERTY OWNER M-H-H-L-L-C IS IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 1313 OF THE PROPERTY MAINTENANCE CODE AT PROPERTY LOCATED AT 76 0 7 OLD TROY PIKE.
SO STATED IS THE BURGER KING WAYNE TOWN PLAZA.
OLD TROY, AKA BURGER KING IS IN VIOLATION OF THE CITY'S CODE REGARDING PARKING LOT MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR.
THERE ARE POTHOLES THROUGHOUT THE DRIVE-THROUGH ORDERING AREA AS WELL AS ELSEWHERE ON THE PROPERTY.
DESPITE REPEATED ATTEMPTS BY THE CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER TO OBTAIN COMPLIANCE AND REPEATED RESPONSES FROM BURGER KING MANAGEMENT THAT A CONTRACTOR HAS BEEN SCHEDULED TO MAKE REPAIRS, THE VIOLATION REMAINS SECTION 13 13 0 4 H FIVE REGARDING DRIVEWAYS AND WALKWAYS READS ALL DRIVEWAYS, WALKWAYS, SIDEWALK STEPS, PARKING SPACES, AND SIMILAR PAVED AREAS FOR PUBLIC USE SHALL BE KEPT UNDER A PROPER STATE OF REPAIR DEBRIS AND SHALL BE MAINTAINED FREE OF HAZARDOUS CONDITIONS.
INSPECTION VERIFIES THE PROPERTY DOES NOT MEET THE STANDARD SET FORTH IN THE CODE, THEREFORE THE PROPERTY IS IN VIOLATION.
YOUR ATTACHED CASE REVIEW ILLUSTRATES THE VIOLATION PROCESS AND NON-COMPLIANCE OF THE PROPERTY.
CITY ZONING LETTERS MAILED TO THE OWNER OF RECORD HAVE NOT BEEN RETURNED.
THERE HAS BEEN COMMUNICATION FROM THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE TO THE CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER WITH NO SATISFACTORY RESOLUTION.
THE TAX RECORD SHOWS PROPERTY TAXES ARE TYPICALLY PAID WITH NO CURRENT ARREARAGE.
ANY WORK THIS BOARD ORDERS WILL BE INVOICED TO THE PROPERTY IN THE OWNER'S NAME.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS THE BOARD DECLARE THE PROPERTY A NUISANCE AND THE BOARD ORDERS STAFF TO HAVE THE CITY CONTRACTOR ABATE TO THE PROPERTY.
IF SO ORDERED, THE CITY WILL EMPLOY A SPECIALTY CONTRACTOR TO MAKE REPAIRS.
QUESTIONS ANYONE? SO ARE WE DEALING WITH THE BURGER KING CORPORATION HERE OR IS THIS A FRANCHISEE? AS FAR AS I KNOW, IT'S CORPORATE.
WE'VE SPOKEN WITH CORPORATE REPRESENTATIVE.
WE'VE ALSO SPOKEN WITH ONSITE MANAGER AND DISTRICT REPRESENTATIVE, AND PROMISES WERE MADE AND NOTHING HAS HAPPENED.
HAVE THEY EVEN DYING TO SHOW US LIKE A CONTRACT WITH ANY KIND OF CONTRACT OR ANYTHING? NO.
THEY'VE CLAIMED THEY HAVE A CONTRACT ENLISTED AND UH, NOTHING SEEMS TO HAPPEN.
SO WE'VE WORKED, WE FELT LIKE WE'VE GIVEN THEM APPLE OPPORTUNITY.
UH, WE KNOW THEY CAN AFFORD IT.
THEY'RE SIMPLY CHOOSING NOT TO GET IT DONE.
AND THIS STARTED WAY BEFORE THE WEATHER WE'VE HAD THAT WOULD PREVENT THAT TYPE OF WORK.
NOW THE REPAIRS THAT WE WOULD BE DOING, ARE WE TALKING JUST PATCHES OVER THE HOLES OR THEY'RE REPAVING THE WHOLE THING? OH, NO PATCHES.
WE'LL DO THE REPAIRS AT THE, AT THE POINTS WHERE THERE ARE POTHOLES.
UH, WE WOULD ADD AND WE WOULD REQUIRE IT TO NOT BE JUST COAL PATCH.
IF YOU KNOW WHAT THAT IS, THAT'S A BAG.
YOU BUY IT RURAL KING AND DUMPING A HOLE IN TAMPA DOWN.
WE WANT THESE CUT OUT AND PATCHED WITH THE PERMANENT TYPE OF PATCH.
PART OF IT'S IN CONCRETE IN THE DRIVE THROUGH.
ALRIGHT, ANYONE ELSE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS? HAVE A MOTION PLEASE.
I'LL MAKE A MOTION THAT WE DECLARE THE PROPERTY NUISANCE AND HAVE IT ABATED.
SO MOTION CARRIES FOR PMRB CASE 24 DASH ZERO TWO AND MOVING ON TO PMRB CASE 24 DASH ZERO THREE.
UM, THE PROPERTY OWNER BALLARD THAN WHITE THAN THANE.
HOW'S THAT?
THE OVERHEAD DOOR WILL NOT CLOSE, PRESUMABLY DUE TO DETACHMENT FROM THE SUPPORTING INFRASTRUCTURE OVERHEAD.
DOORS THAT REMAIN AJA ARE ATTRACTIVE TO VERMIN AND TRESPASSERS AND MAY POSE A SAFETY HAZARD TO OCCUPANTS.
[00:10:01]
H TWO REGARDING DOORS AND WINDOWS READS ALL EXTERIOR DOORS AND WINDOWS SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN GOOD CONDITION.INSPECTION VERIFIES THE PROPERTY DOES NOT MEET THE STANDARDS SET FORTH IN THE CODE, THEREFORE THE PROPERTY IS IN VIOLATION.
YOUR ATTACHED CASE REVIEW ILLUSTRATES THE VIOLATION PROCESS AND NON-COMPLIANCE OF THE PROPERTY.
CITY'S ZONING LETTERS MAILED TO THE OWNER OF RECORD HAVE NOT BEEN RETURNED.
THERE HAS BEEN NO COMMUNICATION FROM THE OWNER TO THE CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICE.
THE TAX RECORD SHOWS PROPERTY TAXES ARE TYPICALLY PAID.
ANY FEES CHARGED FOR THIS BOARD ORDERS WILL BE INVOICED TO THE PROPERTY IN THE OWNER'S NAME.
IF UNPAID, THE FEES WILL BE ASSESSED TO PROPERTY TAXES.
QUARTERLY STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS THE BOARD DECLARE THE PROPERTY A NUISANCE? THE BOARD ORDERS STAFF TO HAVE THE CITY CONTRACTOR ABATE THE PROPERTY.
IF SO, ORDER, THE CITY CONTRACTOR WILL SEE THE REPAIRS ARE MADE.
WHAT WOULD THEY DO WITH THAT MR. MILLARD? WELL, THAT WOULD DEPEND LARGELY ON THE CONDITION OF THE INFRASTRUCTURE.
UM, OUR CONTRACTOR IS FULLY CAPABLE OF MAKING THOSE REPAIRS, BUT WE WOULD HAVE TO HAVE THE COOPERATION OF THE PROPERTY OWNER.
BECAUSE WE WOULD HAVE TO BE, HE WOULD HAVE TO ENTER INTO THE PROPERTY.
THAT'S NOT SOMETHING WE NORMALLY WOULD DO.
THERE IS A POSSIBILITY THAT IF THAT CAME TO BE, THAT I WOULD ORDER HIM TO GET T ONE 11 SIDING FROM LOWE'S, DON NICE PRIMED, KIND ON THE OUTSIDE AND BOARD IT UP.
YOU MEAN BOARD OF THE GARAGE DOOR? YEP.
DOES THE OWNER LIVE IN THE PROPERTY OR IS YES.
THE PROPERTY IS, THE PROPERTY IS OCCUPIED.
TO MY KNOWLEDGE, IT'S OWNER OCCUPIED, BUT WE DON'T INVESTIGATE THAT.
WE ARE, WE'VE MADE, WE'VE NOTIFIED THE, THE OWNER OF RECORD.
ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? ANYONE? ALRIGHT.
COULD I HAVE A MOTION PLEASE? I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO DECLARE THE PROPERTY IN NUISANCE.
MOTION CARRIES FOR PMRB CASE 24 DASH ZERO THREE.
UH, NEXT CASE PMRB CASE 24 DASH ZERO FOUR.
UM, THE PROPERTY OWNER, CHARLES GARRETT, IS IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 1313 OF THE PROPERTY MAINTENANCE CODE.
THAT PROPERTY LOCATED AT 54 23 STORK DRIVE.
AND MR. CHAIRMAN, THE PROPERTY AT 54 23 STORK DRIVE IS IN VIOLATION OF THE CITY'S CODE REGARDING FENCE MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR.
THE PRIVACY DEFENSE IS IN NEED OF REPAIR TO BRING IT INTO COMPLIANCE.
SEVERAL OFFENSE ELEMENTS ARE MISSING WITH BOARDS SIMPLY LEANING IN PLACE TO COVER THE OPEN SPACE.
SECTION 13 13 0 5 B REGARDING FENCES AND RETAINING WALLS.
READS, ALL FENCES SHALL BE ANCHORED FIRMLY IN THE GROUND AND SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN A WORKMAN-LIKE MANNER AND MAINTAINED IN THAT SAME MANNER.
SO THAT SUCH FENCES SHALL ALWAYS BE IN A STATE OF GOOD STRUCTURAL REPAIR.
OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, SUCH STRUCTURES SHALL BE REMOVED OR REPLACED.
INSPECTION VERIFIES THE PROPERTY DOES NOT MEET THE STANDARDS SET FORTH IN THE CODE, THEREFORE THE PROPERTY IS IN VIOLATION.
YOUR ATTACHED CASE REVIEW ILLUSTRATES THE VIOLATION PROCESS AND NON-COMPLIANCE OF THE PROPERTY.
CITY'S ZONING LETTERS MAILED TO THE OWNER OF RECORD HAVE NOT BEEN RETURNED.
THERE HAS BEEN NO COMMUNICATION FOR THE OWNER TO THE CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICE THAT THE PROPERTY IS OCCUPIED.
THE TAX RECORDS SHOWS PROPERTIES ARE TYPICALLY PAID AND THE FEES CHARGED FOR THIS WORK.
THE FOR WORK, THIS BOARD ORDERS RATHER WILL BE INVOLVED.
IT WILL BE INVOICED TO THE PROPERTY IN THE OWNER'S NAME IF UNPAID.
THE FEES WILL BE ATTACHED, UH, ASSESSED TO PROPERTY TAXES.
QUARTERLY STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS THE BOARD DECLARE THE PROPERTY A NUISANCE? THE BOARD ORDERS STAFF TO HAVE THE CITY CONTRACTOR ABATE THE PROPERTY.
IF SO ORDERED, THE CITY CONTRACTOR WILL SEE THAT REPAIRS ARE MADE.
ANY QUESTIONS? WHO DOES THE GARAGE BELONG TO? DOES IT BELONGED TO THAT OWNER? 'CAUSE IT LOOKS KIND OF LIKE, IT'S PROBABLY, I, I DON'T KNOW.
IT LOOKS LIKE IT'S ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE FENCE, BUT THERE'S FENCES ON BOTH SIDES OF IT.
YES, BUT I, I COULDN'T TELL YOU WHICH PROPERTY THE GARAGE BELONGS TO.
ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? ANYONE? DOES THIS INCLUDE THE JUNK ON THE SIDE TOO? MA'AM? DOES THIS INCLUDE THE JUNK ON THE SIDE? NO.
THIS IS A, THIS IS A VIOLATION OF DEFENSE ONLY.
[00:15:01]
HAVE A MOTION PLEASE.I MOVE THAT THE BOARD DECLARE THE PROPERTY A NUISANCE AND THE BOARD ORDERS CITY STAFF TO, UM, ABATE THE PROPERTY.
I SECOND MS. S HAVE VOTE PLEASE.
UH, MOTION CARRIES FOR PMRB CASE 24 DASH ZERO FOUR PMRB CASE 24 DASH ZERO FIVE.
THE PROPERTY OWNER, VICKY HOLDMAN, IS IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 1313 OF THE PROPERTY MAINTENANCE CODE AT PROPERTY LOCATED AT 76 11 STOCKHOLM DRIVE.
MR. CHAIRMAN, THE PROPERTY IS 76 11 STOCKHOLM IS IN VIOLATION OF THE CITY'S CODE.
REGARDING OUTDOOR STORAGE OR USE.
THERE ARE ITEMS ON THE PROPERTY THAT ARE OF NO PRACTICAL USE IN AN OUTDOOR ENVIRONMENT AS WELL AS DILAPIDATED OR DISCARDED ITEMS. THE CONDITION OF THE PROPERTY IS BELOW THE STANDARDS THE CITY EXPECTS OF A HOMEOWNER.
SECTION 13 13 0 4 H SIX READS OUTDOOR STORAGE USE ANY ITEMS USED OR STORED OUTSIDE OF AN ENCLOSED BUILDING OR STRUCTURE SHALL BE LIMITED.
ITEMS MANUFACTURED FOR, INTENDED FOR OR CUSTOMARILY USED IN AN OUTDOOR ENVIRONMENT.
NO ITEMS MANUFACTURED FOR, INTENDED FOR OR CUSTOMARILY STORED OR USED INDOORS MAY BE PLACED OR STORED OUTSIDE.
ALL PERMISSIBLE ITEMS STORED OUTSIDE MUST BE IN GOOD CONDITION AND USABLES INTENDED BY THE MANUFACTURER.
NO SUCH ITEMS THAT ARE BROKEN, DILAPIDATED, OR DISCARDED SHALL BE STORED OUTSIDE.
NO ITEMS MAY BE STORED IN A FRONT YARD.
VERIFIES THE PROPERTY DOES NOT MEET THE STANDARDS SET FORTH IN THE CODE, THEREFORE THE PROPERTY IS IN VIOLATION.
YOUR ATTACHED CASE REVIEW ILLUSTRATES THE VIOLATION PROCESS AND NON-COMPLIANCE OF THE PROPERTY.
CITY ZONING LETTERS MAILED TO THE OWNER OF RECORD HAVE NOT BEEN RETURNED.
THERE HAS BEEN NO COMMUNICATION FROM THE OWNER TO THE CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICE.
THE PROPERTY MAY BE UNOCCUPIED.
THERE IS NO APPRECIABLE WATER USAGE SINCE OCTOBER AND THE CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER REPORTS A CAR NORMALLY SEEN AT THE PROPERTY HAS NOT BEEN CITED IN A WHILE.
THE TAX RECORDS SHOWS PROPERTY TAXES ARE TYPICALLY PAID ANY FEES CHARGED FOR WORK.
THIS BOARD ORDERS WILL BE INVOICED TO THE PROPERTY IN THE OWNER'S NAME IF UNPAID, THE FEES WILL BE ASSESSED TO PROPERTY TAXES.
QUARTERLY STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS THE BOARD DECLARE THE PROPERTY A NUISANCE.
THE BOARD ORDERS STAFF TO HAVE THE CITY CONTRACTOR ABATE THE PROPERTY.
IF SO ORDERED THE CITY CONTRACT WILL BRING THE PROPERTY INTO COMPLIANCE.
ANY QUESTIONS? ANYONE? THAT'S PRETTY GOOD.
I MOVE WITH THE, WE DECLARE A PROPERTY IN NUISANCE.
SO MOTION CARRIES FOR PM RRB CASE 24 DASH FIVE.
ALRIGHT, MOVING ON WITH THE AGENDA.
ADDITIONAL BUSINESS, IT'S NOW TIME FOR ELECTION OF OFFICERS AND I WILL ENTERTAIN A MOTION FOR, I'M SORRY.
SO WE NEED A NOMINATION FIRST.
UM, I THOUGHT WE DID THAT NOMINATION.
SO I'M GONNA KIND OF, KIND OF DO THIS HERE.
SO WE ARE OPENING IT RIGHT NOW FOR ANY NOMINATIONS FOR A CHAIR FOR THE 2024 YEAR A NOMINATE MR. WINKLER.
DO YOU ACCEPT THAT NOMINATION? I DO.
AND, OKAY, SO NOW I NEED A MOTION FOR MR. WINKLER TO BE THE 2024 CHAIR.
I'LL MAKE A MOTION FOR MR. WINKLER TO BE THE 2024 CHAIR.
SO MR. ROBERTS NOMINATED YOU, YOU ACCEPTED.
WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND.
[00:20:01]
SO NOW IT'S OPEN FOR ANY NOMINATIONS FOR A VICE CHAIR.ARE THERE ANY OTHER NOMINATIONS FOR YOURS AS POPULAR AS ME? ARE THERE ANY OTHER NOMINATIONS FOR VICE CHAIR? OKAY, SO NOW WE NEED A MOTION.
I'LL MAKE A MOTION AND I NEED A SECOND.
OH, SO I CAN'T SAY I'LL SECOND
I'M GONNA SAY THE WHOLE THING.
SO SHEILA, YOU NOMINATED MR. ROBERTS, YOU ACCEPTED LEE, YOU MADE A MOTION.
WE HAVE A NEW CHAIR AND VICE CHAIR FOR THE NEW YEAR.
ALRIGHT, I GUESS WE CAN MOVE ON THEN.
ARE THERE ANY COMMENTS REGARDING THE MINUTES OF OCTOBER THE 12TH, 2023? NO COMMENTS.
THE MINUTES OF OCTOBER THE 12TH, 20:23 PM RB MEETING ARE APPROVED.
SO DO WE, WE DO HAVE AN UPCOMING SCHEDULE.
YOU ALL HAVE A SCHEDULE NOW IN FRONT OF YOU.
SO WE'VE ATTACHED THAT NEW SCHEDULE.
IT'S, UM, AS IT HAS ALWAYS BEEN, TWO A MONTH.
YOU KNOW, FOR A WHILE WE WERE ONLY HAVING ENOUGH CASES TO DO ONE A MONTH, BUT WE UM, ARE HAVING A LOT OF CASES NOW.
SO THE TWO MEETING A MONTH MAY COME BACK.
UM, WE'LL KEEP IN TOUCH WITH YOU VIA EMAIL.
SO RIGHT NOW THE NEXT MEETING IS SCHEDULED FOR FEBRUARY 8TH.
UM, I WOULD ANTICIPATE AN UPTAKE IN CASES BEGINNING, ONCE THE SPRING ARRIVES.
SO THAT'S USUALLY HOW THINGS ROLL.
SO PROBABLY FOR THE NEXT COUPLE OF MONTHS, ONE A MONTH.
YEAH, SO FEBRUARY 8TH PROBABLY WILL NOT BE THE NEXT ONE.
UM, I APPRECIATE WHEN YOU GUYS ALL LET ME KNOW YOU'RE NOT GOING TO BE THERE.
AND I KNOW WITH IT BEING KIND OF OFF AND ON, THAT'S HARD TO KEEP UP WITH.
BUT WE'RE PROBABLY LOOKING AT FEBRUARY 22ND FOR THE NEXT ONE.
ALRIGHT, I'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO ADJOURN.