* This transcript was created by voice-to-text technology. The transcript has not been edited for errors or omissions, it is for reference only and is not the official minutes of the meeting. [00:00:01] GOOD EVENING EVERYONE. AND WELCOME TO CITY HEIGHTS, CITY COUNCIL. I, THIS IS A REGULAR SESSION. UH, TODAY'S DATE IS MARCH 14TH, 2022. WE'RE GETTING STARTED RIGHT AT 6:00 PM. THIS MEETING IS OFFICIALLY CALLED TO ORDER ITEM. NUMBER TWO IS OUR INVOCATION AND PASTOR RANDY GRIFFITH OF THE FREE METHODIST CHURCH IS WITH US THIS EVENING. AND THEY WERE AT 60 AND 75 OLD TROY PIKE. AND HE WRITES PASTOR GRIFFIN. THANK YOU FOR BEING HERE, SIR. THANK YOU. HEBREWS 11 SIX SAYS WITHOUT FAITH, IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO PLEASE GOD, BECAUSE ANYONE WHO COMES TO HIM MUST BELIEVE THAT HE EXISTS AND THAT HE REWARDS THOSE WHO EARNESTLY SEEK HIM. THERE ARE TWO BASIC WAYS TO QUESTION GOD. THE FIRST IS TO QUESTION HIS INTEGRITY AND THE SECOND TO ASK LEGITIMATE QUESTIONS. NUMBER TWO IS OKAY. EVIL WORK PURPOSELY WORKS AGAINST GOD TO DECEIVE PEOPLE. HE LURES THEM TO QUESTION WHAT GOD HAS SAID AND ULTIMATELY TO QUESTION GOD AND HIS INTEGRITY. YOU REMEMBER JOB. HE QUESTIONED GOD AND HIS AGONY AND INABILITY TO ANSWER WHY THE BAD THINGS WERE HAPPENING TO HIM. HE ACCUSED GOD OF INJUSTICE FOR PUNISHING HIM THOUGH. HE HAD DONE NOTHING WRONG. IT'S AN UNFORTUNATE WAY OF HANDLING WHAT WE CANNOT EXPLAIN IT OFFENDS GOD. WHEN WE DO NOT TRUST HIS CHARACTER IN THE MIDST OF UNEXPLAINABLE CIRCUMSTANCES, WHEN GOD HAS NOT CHOSEN TO LET US KNOW WHY, BUT AS SOMEONE SAID, IF YOU KNOW GOD, IF YOU TRULY KNOW HIM, YOU DON'T NEED TO KNOW WHY. AND IF YOU WERE FAMILIAR WITH THE STORY, JOE KNEW GOD BETTER AND WAS BLESSED MORE AFTER HIS DIFFICULT TRIAL THAN BEFORE, AS IS THE CASE FOR THOSE WHOM GOD USES AND CORRECTS. WHEN MARY WAS TOLD BY THE ANGEL GABRIEL THAT SHE WAS GOING TO GIVE BIRTH TO THE SON OF GOD, SHE QUESTIONED GOD, HOW WILL THIS BE? SINCE I'M A VIRGIN? AND AFTER THE ANGEL EXPLAINED THAT IT WOULD BE THE WORK OF THE HOLY SPIRIT, SHE ANSWERED, I AM THE LORD'S SERVANT. MAY IT BE TO ME? AS YOU HAVE SAID, SHE DID NOT QUESTION GOD HAD OF DOUBT AND UNBELIEF. SHE ASKED A LEGITIMATE QUESTION, SHE RECEIVED AN ANSWER AND SHE BELIEVED GOD. SO GOD FINDS IT OFFENSIVE FOR US TO DOUBT HIS CHARACTER. BUT SO DO PEOPLE, PEOPLE THAT GOD MAY CALL US TO SERVE. HOW MANY OF US JUMPED TO CONCLUSIONS? PERCEIVING THE WORST? WHEN ANOTHER PERSON MAY NOT SEE THINGS AS WE DO OR SAYS SOMETHING THAT DOES NOT LINE UP WITH WHAT WE THINK OR BELIEVE RATHER THAN BECOME OFFENDED, DEFENSIVE OR JUDGEMENTAL, WHICH MAY SHUT THE DOOR TO ANY OPENNESS IN HEARING WHAT WE HAVE TO SAY, ASK WHAT DO YOU MEAN? LET THEM EXPLAIN THEIR POSITION, ASK AND LISTEN WITHOUT FINDING FAULT LIKE JESUS DOES WITH US. LOVE THEM FIRST. THEN YOU MAY HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO SHARE WHAT YOU HAVE WITH THEM. LET'S PRAY, FATHER, WE THANK YOU FOR THE OPPORTUNITY TO MEET TONIGHT. AND LORD, JUST PRAY THAT YOU WOULD PRESIDE OVER THIS MEETING AND DIRECT THE THOUGHTS, THE MINDS, THE HEARTS OF ALL INVOLVED, THAT EVERYTHING MIGHT BE DONE IN A WAY THAT'S PLEASING TO YOU. AND WE'LL THANK YOU IN JESUS NAME. AMEN. I MEAN, I PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. AND TO VERIFY THAT STANDS ONE NATION UNDER GOD, INDIVISIBLE WITH LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL MR. ROGERS, WOULD YOU CALL THE ROLL PLEASE? MR. SHAW. MS. BAKER, MR. CAMPBELL HERE. MRS. BERG. MR. OTTO HERE. MR. LIONS HERE. THIS IS KITCHEN, MR. BAB HERE. MIRACLE WAR HERE. WE HAVE, UH, MS. KITCHEN, MR. SHORE OUT THIS EVENING, BOTH OF THEM HAVE RESPECTFULLY ASKED THAT WE EXCUSE HER ABSENCE AS THIS EVENINGS ARE A MOTION. MR. CAMPBELL MOTION TO EXCUSE YOUR ABSENCE, MS. BERG, EMOTIONAL. THE SECOND. ANY DISCUSSION MR. ROGERS, MS. BAKER. YES. MR. CAMPBELL. YES. MRS. BERG. MR. OTTO. YES. MR. LYONS. YES. MR. WEB AND EXCUSE PESTA. [00:05:01] SIX TO ZERO. LET'S SEE HERE. [5. Approval Of Minutes] NEXT UP IS OUR NUMBER FIVE, WHICH IS THE APPROVAL OF MINUTES. THERE ARE TWO SETS OF MINUTES THAT, UH, NEED APPROVE THIS EVENING. ITEM FIVE EIGHT ARE THE MINUTES FROM FEBRUARY EIGHT. I'M SORRY, FEBRUARY 28TH, 2022. AND THEN ALSO A SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES FROM MARCH 8TH, 2022. UH, THOSE MINUTES HAVE BEEN DISTRIBUTED FOR NEW CORRECTIONS. THOSE MENTAL STANDARDS APPROVED ANY CORRECTIONS. OKAY. THOSE MINUTES ARE APPROVED. NEXT UP. IS THAT NUMBER SIX SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS? MS. ROGERS. THERE ARE NONE THIS EVENING. OKAY. AND OUR NUMBER SEVEN IS CITIZENS' COMMENTS. WE HAVE SOME SENTENCE COMMENTS TO SEE THE CORRECT. UH, YES. WE HAVE SOME TO SPEAK ON AN ITEM THAT WILL BE DISCUSSED UNDER ITEM NINE, THE CITY MANAGER REPORT. OKAY. SO THE WAY WE'LL HANDLE THE ASSISTANCE COMMENTS FOR THOSE OF YOU THAT ARE REGISTERED TO SPEAK TO SEEMING, UM, THE CITY MANAGER HAS SOME INFORMATION ON, UH, THE DEVELOPMENT THAT YOU'RE HERE TO SPEAK ABOUT. SO ONCE WE HAVE THAT INFORMATION, HE EXPLAINS THAT THEN CERTAINLY AT THAT POINT IN TIME, WE WILL THEN HAVE COMMENTS OR HAVE YOU TO THE PODIUM TO SPEAK ABOUT, UH, THE ISSUE THAT YOU WANT TO, ONCE WE HAVE ALL THE INFORMATION FROM THE ASSISTANT OR THE INTERIM STATE MANAGER NEXT UP IS I HAVE EIGHT SYSTEMS REGISTER TO SPEAK ON AGENDA ITEMS. ARE THERE ANY OF THOSE LEARN ON THERE? OKAY. THANK YOU. AND [9. City Manager Report] NIGHT NUMBER NINE IS NOW THE SAME AS REPORT. SO MR. CHAD CASKEY, HOW ARE YOU, SIR? I'M GOOD. MR. MAYOR. HOW ABOUT YOURSELF? VERY WELL, THANK YOU. EXCELLENT. A COUPLE OF ITEMS FOR COUNCIL'S CONSIDERATION TONIGHT AND INFORMATION. UH, FIRST OFF, UH, WE DID RECEIVE CONFIRMATION TODAY FROM THE MIAMI VALLEY REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION THAT WE ARE THE RECIPIENT OF $2.17 MILLION FOR THE, UH, RECONSTRUCTION OF WEST CHAMBERSBURG ROAD FROM OLD TROY PIKE DOWN TO THE CITY LIMIT. UH, AND IN THE NAME OF MCRPC WANTED TO LET COUNCIL KNOW THAT WE WILL BE SUBMITTING OUR AGE FRIENDLY COMMUNITIES GRANT TOMORROW, WHICH IS THE DEADLINE TO DO SO. UH, WE'LL BE MAKING THAT APPLICATION, UH, ALSO WANT TO MAKE COUNCIL AWARE THAT, UH, LWCC HAS BEEN AUTHORIZED TO BID THE CR DATE AND THE RENOVATION PROJECT. WE'LL BE HAVING A FOLLOW-UP CONVERSATION WITH THEM AT THE STAFF LEVEL REGARDING SOME SPECIFICS ABOUT OUR PROCESS, BUT THAT HAS BEEN AUTHORIZED. UH, AND WE'RE WAITING ON AN UPDATED SCHEDULE FROM THEM WITH RESPECT TO, UH, RECEIPT OF BIDS. SO WE CAN PRESENT THOSE TO COUNCIL FOR YOUR REVIEW AND SELECTION, AND THEN THE, UH, THE SCHEDULE FROM THAT POINT. SO WE'LL HAVE SOME ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FOR YOU ON THAT. ALSO HAD AN OPPORTUNITY LAST WEEK TO SPEAK WITH A DEVELOPER ASSOCIATED WITH HEATHER MERE PHASE TWO AT THE INTERSECTION OF BELL FOUNTAIN AND KITTRIDGE. THEY ARE PLANNING TO MOVE AHEAD, UH, AND THEY PLAN ON MAKING SOME MORE, UH, DRAMATICALLY MORE DRAMATICALLY NOTICEABLE IMPROVEMENTS TO THE PROPERTY A LITTLE LATER THIS YEAR. UH, ADDITIONALLY, UH, WITH, UH, DIRT MOVING OVER THERE, WANT TO LET YOU KNOW THAT WE'RE MOVING SOME DIRT OVER AT MYRIAD MEADOWS. THIS IS REMEDIATION OF SOME PCE AND TCE CONTAMINATED SOIL ASSOCIATED WITH THE DRY CLEANER THAT WAS THERE PREVIOUSLY. UH, AND THAT WAS PART OF OUR ANTICIPATED WORK OVER AT THAT SITE. AND THEN, UH, ALSO WANT TO MAKE COUNCIL WHERE I WILL BE WORKING ON THURSDAY AND FRIDAY, BUT IT WILL NOT BE HERE. IT WILL BE IN COLUMBUS. THIS IS OUR ANNUAL OHIO CITY COUNTY MANAGERS ASSOCIATION CONFERENCE. SO TO MAINTAIN, UH, THE ACCREDITATION I HAVE THROUGH ICMI, I NEED THE REQUIRED HOURS. SO I WILL BE THERE THURSDAY AFTERNOON AND FRIDAY MORNING, BUT AVAILABLE TO ALL OF YOU VIA EMAIL AND PHONE, SHOULD YOU NEED ME, UH, THAT IS THE GENERAL POINTS OF MY REPORT, BUT, UH, TO, UH, THE PROJECT AT HAND, OR I GUESS THE DISCUSSION AT HAND, WHICH IS THIS PARTICULAR PROJECT, UH, THIS IS THE RESERVES THAT NEED MORE, UH, WHICH IS A PROJECT THAT CAME TO THE CITY'S ATTENTION. I SHOULDN'T SAY TO THE CITY'S ATTENTION, BUT, UH, CAME FRONT AND CENTER TO COUNCIL'S RADAR LATE LAST WEEK, I BELIEVE WITH THE PETITION THAT CAME IN, UH, TO THE CLERK'S OFFICE ON MARCH 9TH. I JUST WANT TO TALK TO COUNCIL, UH, AND HIGHLIGHT SOME OF THE INFORMATION THAT I HAD PROVIDED TO YOU BACK ON THE 10TH, UH, I BELIEVE, AND THEN, UH, WHERE WE ARE AS OF TODAY WITH THIS PROJECT. SO BACK ON NOVEMBER 2ND, UH, THE CITY DID RECEIVE, UH, A CONCEPT DRAWING. THIS IS THE CONCEPT DRAWING THAT WE RECEIVED, UH, FROM THE DEVELOPER'S ENGINEER REGARDING THIS POTENTIAL PROJECT. AND THE FOLLOWING DAY ON NOVEMBER 3RD, I HAD AN OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK WITH THE ENGINEER, OR SHE WENT WITH THE ENGINEER WITH THE DEVELOPER, UH, AND I ALSO OBTAINED A COPY OF THIS SECTION, UH, OF THE CONCEPTUAL PLAN. THIS PARTICULAR PARCEL HERE IS IN, UH, THE CITY OF RIVERSIDE. AND THIS IS ZONED R ONE, I BELIEVE, UH, THIS PARCEL HERE, UH, WHICH IS THIS PLAN. UH, THIS IS ALL IN DAYTON AND THIS PARCEL IS ZONED INDUSTRIAL, UH, FOLLOWING RECEIPT OF THIS INFORMATION. UH, I HAD COMMUNICATION WITH, UM, JEFF GREEN FROM THE DAYTON PLANNER'S OFFICE ON WHAT WOULD HAVE BEEN NOVEMBER 3RD AND BASICALLY SPOKE WITH THEM ABOUT THIS PARTICULAR PLAN, UH, AND THE CONCEPTS BEHIND IT, THROUGH THE COURSE OF OUR CONVERSATION. I ADVISED JEFF THAT WE WOULD NOT BE TAKING A POSITION AT THIS POINT IN TIME, ONLY [00:10:01] FROM THE STANDPOINT THAT THIS PROJECT HAD NOT YET GONE THROUGH ITS PROCESS. SO THIS WAS AN INITIAL SUBMITTAL TO BRING THE INFORMATION TO OUR ATTENTION, AND THEY WOULD BE GOING THROUGH, UH, THERE IN THIS INSTANCE, REZONING PROCESS FOR THE DATE AND PARCEL, AND THEN THEY WOULD ALSO BE GOING THROUGH THEIR CONVENTIONAL, UM, PLAN REVIEW ON THE RIVERSIDE PORTION OF THE PROJECT AS WELL, BECAUSE THE RIVERSIDE PORTION DID NOT REQUIRE REZONING TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. UM, SO IT VASTLY SAT WITH THE CITY OF DATE, UM, ON, UM, NOVEMBER 10TH, A DATE AND PLANNING EMAIL, THE CITY TO CONFIRM THAT THE PLAN, UH, BOARD, UH, WAS GETTING READY TO MEET WITH THE DEVELOPER, UH, WITH RESPECT TO, UM, THIS PLAN AND TALK THROUGH QUESTIONS AND CONCERNS THAT THEY MIGHT HAVE, UM, DURING THAT INITIAL AND, UH, DURING THAT INITIAL PRESENTATION, UM, WHICH WOULD BE SIMILAR TO OUR WORK SESSION OR WORKSHOP WHERE THE DEVELOPER JUST KIND OF SHOWS UP AND JUST KIND OF TALKS TO THEIR CONCEPT OR TALKS TO THEIR IDEA WITH THE BOARD TO GET IDEAS. THAT'S WHAT OCCURRED, UH, BACK ON, UM, NOVEMBER 10TH. UM, AND AT THAT POINT IN TIME, NO ISSUES WERE REPORTED FROM, UH, HUBER HEIGHTS RESIDENTS, BUT THAT'S NOT A, THAT WOULDN'T BE UNCOMMON BECAUSE THAT PARTICULAR NOTICE WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN A POSTED MEETING THAT WAS JUST IN FOR THE DEVELOPER TO GET INFORMATION. THEN ON NOVEMBER 30TH, THE CITY OF DANA EMAILED, UH, TO ADVISE THAT, UH, THEY HAD NOT SEEN ANY IMMEDIATE MOVEMENT ON THIS PLAN, BUT WE'RE ANTICIPATING TO SEE THE PLAN COME FORWARD FOR FORMAL REVIEW IN JANUARY OF 2022 ON DECEMBER 8TH. UH, I HAD A MEETING WITH THE RIVERSIDE CITY MANAGER, JOSH RAUSCH, WHERE I DISCUSSED, UM, SEVERAL, SEVERAL DIFFERENT ITEMS, BUT ONE OF WHICH INCLUDED, UH, THE PLAN HERE, UH, THAT WAS PROPOSED, UM, THERE'S A SEGMENT OF THIS DEVELOPMENT HERE, UH, WHICH THE DEVELOPER INTENDS TO DEDE, UH, TO THE CITY FOR AN EXPANSION OF, UM, OF TOM CLOUD PARK. SO THAT WAS AN ELEMENT WE HAD DISCUSSED AS WELL AS A COUPLE OF OTHER ISSUES OF MUTUAL INTEREST OUTSIDE OF THE SCOPE OF THIS PARTICULAR PROJECT. THEN, EXCUSE ME, THEN ON DECEMBER 16TH, UH, DAYTON PLANNING, THEN EMAIL TO ADVISE THAT NOTICES FOR THE REZONING AND CONSIDERATION OF THEIR PARCEL, UH, WHICH IS THIS SECTION HERE, UH, WOULD BE GOING OUT TO, UH, ALL PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 250 FEET OF THIS PARTICULAR LOCATION, ADVISING THEM OF THE UPCOMING CONSIDERATION OF THIS PLAN, UH, AT WHAT WOULD HAVE BEEN, I THINK IT WAS THE JANUARY 11TH PLAN BOARD OR JANUARY 10TH PLAN BOARD MEETING THAT THE CITY OF DAYTON HAD, UH, ON OR ABOUT JANUARY 13TH, WHICH WOULD HAVE BEEN FOLLOWING THAT MEETING. I HAD A CONVERSATION GUIDE WITH DAYTON PLANNING, UH, AND WAS ADVISED THAT, UH, NO RESIDENT OF HUBER HEIGHTS ATTENDED THAT MEETING AND SPOKEN OPPOSITION TO THE PLAN ON FEBRUARY 22ND. UM, LET'S SEE, UM, EXCUSE ME, UH, ON MARCH 3RD, PARDON ME ON MARCH 3RD. UM, I SPOKE WITH DAYTON PLANNING AND WAS ADVISED THAT, THAT A HUBER HEIGHTS RESIDENT HAD REACHED OUT TO THEM DIRECTLY AND EXPRESSED CONCERN ABOUT THIS PARTICULAR PROJECT. SO AT THAT POINT IN TIME, WE BECAME AWARE THAT, UH, THERE WAS, UH, SOME DISSATISFACTION FROM HUBER HEIGHTS RESIDENTS THAT ARE MARCH 10TH. WE RECEIVED A PETITION. I RECEIVED THE PETITION, I THINK IT CAME IN A DAY OR TWO BEFORE THAT THROUGH TONY'S OFFICE. BUT, UH, I RECEIVED, UH, THE PETITION ON MARCH 10TH. AND THEN LATER THAT AFTERNOON, UH, I ADVISED, I EMAILED DAYTON PLANNING AND ADVISED THAT, UM, AT LEE HAR, UH, THE CITY WOULD BE, UH, NOW REQUIRING A CRASH GATE. SO WHERE WE HAD OFFERED NO OPINION AND ALLOWED THE DEVELOPER TO PRESENT AN OPEN THROUGH PLAN AT THIS PARTICULAR LOCATION, WE THEN EMAILED DAYTON AND SAID, OKAY, WE TOLD YOU IF WE HAD CONCERNED FROM OUR RESIDENTS, WE WOULD OBJECT AND, UH, AND ADVISE THAT THE CRASH GATE BE PUT IN FOR PUBLIC SAFETY ACCESS. ONLY WE FOLLOWED THAT UP WITH COMMUNICATION TO RIVERSIDE ADVISING TO RIVERSIDE THAT AT THIS POINT IN TIME, WE STILL HAD NO OPINION, UM, OR OFFERED NO OPINION ON THIS PARTICULAR CONNECTION AS IT WAS FOR 13 CUL-DE-SACS OR FOR 13, LOTS ON A COL-DE-SAC. BUT IN THE EVENT, UH, THAT THE DEVELOPER TRIED TO ADJUST OR MODIFY ANY OF THESE CONNECTION POINTS BECAUSE OF THE CLOSURE AT LEHIGH OR AT LEE HAR, THAT WE WOULD THEN AGAIN, DEMAND THE CRASH GATE AT THIS PARTICULAR LOCATION, BECAUSE THAT WAS OUTSIDE OF THE SCOPE OF WHAT WE FELT WAS INAPPROPRIATE CONNECTION HERE, UH, WITH THE COL-DE-SAC, UH, AS I SAID, THEN I FOLLOWED THAT UP WITH COMMUNICATION TO RIVERSIDE, UH, EXPRESSING THAT CONCERN. UH, AND THEN ON MARCH 11TH, UH, WE A REPLY BACK FROM THE CITY ASKING THAT WE SUBMIT, UH, ACKNOWLEDGING THAT OUR, OUR, UH, OUR CONDITION, UH, BUT THEN ASKED THAT WE PROVIDE THAT ON LETTERHEAD, WHICH WILL BE DONE TOMORROW. SO [00:15:01] WE'LL COMPLETE THAT PROCESS AND SEND THAT OUT. UH, THEN, UH, LATE THIS AFTERNOON, BEFORE WE CAME INTO THIS PARTICULAR MEETING, WE RECEIVED A FORWARDED EMAIL THROUGH THE OFFICE OF, UH, DATE AND PLANNING FROM, WHICH WAS ACTUALLY A RIVERSIDE RESIDENT WHO HAD REQUESTED SOME ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, UH, WITH RESPECT TO TRAFFIC STUDIES, UH, AND SOME ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENTS REGARDING, UH, STORM WATER. SO THAT WAS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION THAT'S BEEN REQUESTED AND THAT'S BEING DISSEMINATED THROUGH THE PARTIES. SO THAT'S WHERE WE ARE AS OF TODAY, BASED ON THIS PARTICULAR PROJECT, AT LEAST WITH WHAT WE KNOW, UH, I'M NOT QUITE SURE WHERE, UH, THE CITY OF DAYTON, UH, LIES IN ITS PROCESS. UH, I KNOW THAT THEY HAVE THE NEIGHBORHOOD PRIORITY BOARDS AND THERE'S A REZONING INVOLVED HERE. SO WE'RE NOT QUITE SURE WHERE THAT HEADS BEYOND, UH, BUT WE'VE BEEN COMMUNICATING, UH, WITH THEIR PLANNING DEPARTMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHAT WE KNOW. AND THEN ON THE RIVERSIDE, UH, ON THE RIVERSIDE SIDE OF THE HOUSE, MY UNDERSTANDING IS THAT THAT WAS RECENTLY APPROVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BUT IT'S ALSO HEADED TO, UH, CITY COUNCIL FOR, UH, FOR REVIEW AND, UM, AN ACTION. SO THAT'S WHERE WE SIT CURRENTLY, UM, WITH RESPECT TO THESE PROJECTS AND WHAT WE KNOW, UH, WE'VE ALLOWED THEM TO FOLLOW THEIR PROCESS, JUST LIKE WE WOULD FOLLOW OUR PROCESS ON OUR SIDE OF THE LINE. AND WE'VE BEEN PROVIDING INPUT AND GUIDANCE. WE CAN WITH RESPECT TO THE BEST INTEREST OF, OF OUR COMMUNITY, UH, AS, AS IT RELATES TO THESE TWO PARTICULAR LOCATIONS AT HARSHMAN VILLE AND LEE HART. SO THAT'S WHERE WE STAND AS OF RIGHT NOW, UH, THERE IS STILL SOME ADDITIONAL COMMUNICATION, LIKE I SAID, COMING FROM THE CITY OF DAYTON WITH RESPECT TO A TRAFFIC STUDY AND STORMWATER AND SOME ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS. BUT, UH, BUT THAT'S WHERE WE SIT BACK CURRENT. LET ME THINK. SO, YES. UH, I RECEIVED SEVERAL, SEVERAL PHONE CALLS FROM RESIDENTS ABOUT THE POTENTIAL FOR TRAFFIC FEEDING OUT, UH, NOT ONLY LEE HAR, WHICH YOU'RE SAYING I SAW YOUR MEMO, WHICH SAID THAT WOULDN'T BE ALLOWED, BUT FOR THE POTENTIAL FOR ALL THAT TRAFFIC TO COME OUT ON THE HARSHMAN DEL AND, UM, UNDERSTANDING THAT, UH, THE CITY COMMISSIONERS, THE DAYTON CITY COMMISSIONERS THAT WERE MEETING LAST MONDAY TO APPROVE THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE, THEIR PLANNING COMMISSION FOR THIS DEVELOPMENT. UM, I CALLED THE COMMISSIONER, MATT JOSEPH, AND ASKED HIM IF THEY COULD AT LEAST, UH, REQUEST THAT A, UH, THAT A, THAT THEY RECONSIDER ANOTHER EAT GRASS WITHOUT, UH, POSSIBLY POURING ALL THAT TRAFFIC INTO HUBER HEIGHTS, UH, BECAUSE OUR RESIDENTS, I FEEL THAT THEY HAVE RECEIVED INSUFFICIENT NOTICE OF THE POTENTIAL IMPACT TO THEM THAT THIS WOULD DEVELOPMENT WILL BRING, AND THEY DID GET ONE NOTICE IN, BUT IT WAS JUST THE CAR. THEY DIDN'T SAY ANYTHING ABOUT WHAT WAS GOING ON. IT HAD NO DRAWINGS, IT JUST SAYS, COME TO THIS PLANNING MEETING. SO SOME OF THEM, THEY DIDN'T GO BECAUSE THEY HAD NO IDEA WHAT IT WAS ABOUT THEN, UH, LAST WEEK, UH, PRIOR TO THE COMMISSIONER'S MEETING, ANOTHER POSTCARD WENT OUT TO THE RESIDENTS WITHIN 250 FEET THAT HAD, UH, MR. OTTO'S NAME ON IT, MY NAME ON IT, AND MR. CAMPBELL'S NAME ON IT. AND I DON'T KNOW IF IT HAD AN MAYOR'S NAME ON IT, UH, ADVISING THEM OF THE COMMISSIONERS MEETING THAT WAS GOING TO OCCUR THIS PAST MONDAY. WELL, THEY WENT AHEAD AND I HAVEN'T BEEN ABLE TO CATCH UP WITH THE LAST PERSON THAT CALLED ME TO FIND OUT WHAT THEIR THOUGHTS WERE ON IT, BUT I DID THE BEST I COULD. AND, AND CALLING THE COMMISSIONER AND SAY, WOULD YOU PLEASE AT LEAST VOICE OUR CITIZENS CONCERNS? UM, I AM A LITTLE, A LITTLE PUT OUT HERE THAT THIS PROCESS HAS AS COMMISSIONER JOSEPH SAID HAS BEEN GOING ON WITH DAYTON FOR OVER A YEAR. UH, IF WE GOT NOTICED IN NOVEMBER THAT THIS WOULD POTENTIALLY IMPACT OUR COMMUNITY, UM, I, I, AS A MEMBER OF COUNCIL WOULD HAVE LIKED TO HAVE AT LEAST BEEN GIVEN A HEADS UP THAT THIS WAS IN THE PROCESS. SO EVEN IF THE RESIDENTS DIDN'T GET NOTICE OF WHAT WAS GOING ON THAT, UH, MR. OTTO AND I, AND MR. KMO COULD KEEP AN EYE OPEN OF HOW THE PROCESS WAS GOING AND PERHAPS GIVE THEM FEEDBACK FROM THE RESIDENTS THAT THEY DID NOT GET. THEY SAID THAT, UH, YOU KNOW, THEY DIDN'T HEAR FROM ANYONE. SO I HOPE IN THE FUTURE, IF WE FACE SOMETHING LIKE THIS, THAT, THAT WE WILL BE GIVEN THE COURTESY OF A HEADS UP TO, UM, TO HELP KEEP OUR CITIZENS ADVISED OF WHAT WE DO KNOW, AND WHAT'S GOING ON HERE. UM, IT'S MY UNDERSTANDING THAT THE COMMISSIONERS APPROVED IT FOR THE CITY OF DAYTON. AND I THINK IN JANUARY, I BELIEVE YOU SAID THAT, UH, RIVERSIDE PLANNING APPROVED IT. AND ANY DAY [00:20:01] NOW, I DIDN'T GET A CHANCE TO CHECK THEIR SCHEDULE. ANYTIME. NOW IT'S GOING TO GO BEFORE THEIR COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL. BUT, UM, BUT COMMISSIONER JOSEPH TOLD ME THAT IT'S FAR FROM DONE BECAUSE THEY WILL HAVE A TRAFFIC STUDY AND THAT TRAFFIC STUDY WILL ASSESS THE IMPACT OF ALL THAT TRAFFIC COMING ON TO, UM, HARSH BIENVILLE, WHETHER THERE'S SUFFICIENT, SUFFICIENT WIDE ROAD AND THE CLARENCE IS NECESSARY FOR, FOR ALL THOSE CARS TO FEED ON THERE. SO, UM, THAT IS A LITTLE BIT MORE THAN, THAN WHAT YOU JUST REPORTED, JUST, JUST TO SHARE INFORMATION OF WHAT I'VE EXPERIENCED. UM, SO HOPEFULLY, UH, WE CAN ALL BECOME MORE ENGAGED AS, AS THIS MOVES ON. AND I HOPE THERE, UH, LOOKING AT, UM, AT ANOTHER EGRESS POINT FOR, FOR THIS DEVELOPMENT. SO I GUESS ME AND MY I'M CONFUSED BECAUSE THE HARSHMAN ADVIL CONNECTION IS FOUR 13, LOTS AND 13 ONLY. AND ALL OTHER TRAFFIC FROM THE SUBDIVISION WILL EXIT ONTO NEED MORE ROAD. UH, THAT'S NOT THE WAY IT WAS EXPLAINED TO ME. SO IT, IT IS AROUND THE THIRD. THEY CALLED THE SAC WHAT 13 HOMES, BUT IT ALSO WILL HAVE A WAY FOR THE PEOPLE FROM THAT DEVELOPMENT TO FEED ONTO HARP, TO FUND ONTO HARSHMAN ROAD. AND THIS IS EXACTLY WHY WE NEED TO BE INVOLVED SO THAT WE CAN ACTUALLY HAVE THE DISCUSSION AND GET THE SPECIFICS OF, OF, SO, I MEAN, IF THERE'S A, IF YOU'RE AWARE OF A DIFFERENT PLAN, UM, THEN THIS, WHICH IS THE CONNECTION POINT TO LEE HART, WHICH IS THE ONE THAT WE ADVISED NO, WOULD NOW BE THE CRASH GATE AND THIS EXIT POINT ON TWO NEED MORE ROAD, THERE IS NO OTHER CONNECTION INTO HUBER HEIGHTS OTHER THAN THE RIVERSIDE SECTION, WHICH IS THIS CONNECTION HERE. WHEREAS HER HUSBAND WROTE ON HERE, WELL, THIS IS HARSHMAN VILLE RIGHT HERE, AND THIS IS 13 LOTS ON THIS CUL-DE-SAC PERIOD. THERE IS NO, THERE ARE NO OTHER LOTS THAT HAVE ACCESS. THERE'S NO OTHER PORTION OF THIS SUBDIVISION THAT HAS ACCESS TO HARSHMAN BUILDING THESE 13 LOTS AND THAT CONNECTION. YOU'VE GOT THE, YOU'VE GOT THE DELINEATED WATERWAY HERE AND INDEED MORE HERE. RIGHT? SO IT'S THESE 13 LOTS. SO I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT WE'RE ON THE, BASED ON YOUR COMMENTS. THAT LEADS ME TO BELIEVE THAT THE ENTIRETY OF THE SUBDIVISION HAS AN OPPORTUNITY TO ACCESS THIS DISCONNECTION, WHICH IS NOT THE CONVERSATION THAT I'VE HAD WITH DAYTON PLANNING, NOR WOULD CITY OF RIVERSIDE. AND I TALKED TO JEFF GREEN. THAT'S WHAT LED ME TO BELIEVE THAT WE'D BE MORE THAN NO CERTAIN HOUSES. SO THAT IS NOT THE COMMUNICATION. OKAY. THAT'S FINE. I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT WE'RE ALL ON THE SAME PAGE. YES. AND I WOULD AGREE MA'AM AND THAT'S, THAT'S TYPICALLY WHY. YES, MA'AM I WOULD AGREE THAT IT IS HELPFUL THAT WE WOULD, RIGHT. AND HE SENT ME ALL OF THESE DRAWINGS HERE AND, AND I WAS KIND OF EMBARRASSED HAVING TO ASK HIM TO SEND THEM TO US, YOU KNOW, SO, WELL, I WOULD ENCOURAGE YOU THEN MA'AM IN THE FUTURE TO CONTACT MY OFFICE OR ANY MEMBER OF STAFF. WE HAD THESE DRAWINGS AS WELL. SO WE COULD HAVE, WE DIDN'T KNOW. I, WE DID NOT KNOW. I MEAN, WE HAVE NOT HAD DISCUSSIONS ABOUT THIS DEVELOPMENT BASICALLY UNTIL TONIGHT. SO AGAIN, I HAVE HEARD YOUR, I'VE HEARD YOUR CALL FOR IMPROVED COMMUNICATION AND WE WILL, WE WILL DO SO, BUT AGAIN, I WOULD ENCOURAGE YOU IN THE FUTURE RATHER THAN, RATHER THAN CALLING MR. GREEN OR CALL OTHERS OUTSIDE THE ORGANIZATION. I WOULD ENCOURAGE YOU TO CALL US FIRST. WE MAY STILL HAVE THE INFORMATION, ALTHOUGH WE MIGHT NOT HAVE SHARED IT WITH YOU, WE MIGHT HAVE THE INFORMATION AVAILABLE TO SHARE WITH YOU. YEAH. AND THAT'S THE POINT? WELL TAKEN. IT'S JUST THAT WHEN I FOUND OUT IT WAS THE DAY BEFORE, THE WEEKEND, BEFORE THE MEETING, IT WAS BEING HELD ON MONDAY TO APPROVE IT. SO I HAD TO ACT PRETTY QUICKLY AND HANDS WITH SOME OF OUR CITIZENS CONCERNS. YEAH. AND YES, MA'AM, AND I'M HERE AND AVAILABLE TO YOU WHEN YOU NEED ME. SO AGAIN, I WOULD ENCOURAGE YOU TO REACH OUT WITH ANY QUESTIONS OR CONCERNS WHEN YOU HAVE THEM. CAN I ASK YOU A FOLLOW UP ON, ON THE STATEMENT THAT YOU MADE ABOUT ANNEX AND PART OF, UH, UH, THOMAS CLOUD PARK, UH, W REGARDING THE, THEIR DONATION OF PROPERTY? IS IT, I THAT'S WHAT I WANTED CLARIFICATION. SO IN THAT PROCESS THAT BELONGS TO RIVERSIDE, RIGHT. THAT IS CORRECT. THIS PARCEL. AND THEN THERE'S ANOTHER PORTION RIGHT HERE, UM, ON THIS CORNER OF, UH, NORTHERN CIRCLE THAT IS ALSO WITHIN THE CITY OF RIVERSIDE. THAT'S A PORTION OF TOM CLOUD PARK. RIGHT. [00:25:01] SO THEY'RE TALKING ABOUT DONATING THAT. UH, YES, MA'AM. OKAY. BUT, AND THAT'S WHERE A LOT OF OUR MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT IS UP IN THE UPPER PORTION. UH, AND YEAH. AND THIS, YEAH. IN THIS PARTICULAR AREA, WHAT WOULD BE, I BELIEVE IT'S RIGHT OVER HERE. YES, MA'AM. OKAY. UM, AND THE OTHER THING, UH, IS THERE ANY MORE QUESTIONS ON THAT BECAUSE I HAVE ONE MORE, UM, ON THE HEATHER MIRROR, YOU SAID THEY'RE GOING TO BE MOVING DIRT TO CLEAN IT UP. WHAT'S THAT MEAN WE HAD, WE HADN'T SEEN A LOT OF ACTIVITY AT THAT PARTICULAR LOCATION. SO I'D REACHED OUT TO THE DEVELOPER AND ASKED THEM WHAT THEIR SCHEDULE WAS WITH RESPECT, TO BEING ABLE TO DEVELOP THAT SITE AND THE INITIAL CONVERSATION. UM, AND SOME OF THE INFORMATION WE HAD LED US TO BELIEVE THAT THEY WERE NOT ACTUALLY GOING TO BEGIN CONSTRUCTING ANYTHING ON THE SITE UNTIL 2023. AND WITH THE DEVELOPERS INDICATED IS NO, THAT THEY ACTUALLY INTEND TO BE IN THERE LATER THIS YEAR IN POURING FOUNDATION, SO THAT THEY CAN BE, UM, ACTUALLY TRYING TO GET, UH, LUMBER AND BRICKS UP, UH, THROUGH THE WINTER, ASSUMING THAT WE'VE GOT A MILD WINTER. SO THEY'RE GOING TO BE DOING SOME MORE SUBSTANTIAL WORK ON THAT PROPERTY, UH, TO GET YOUR BASIC UTILITIES IN AND GET FOUNDATIONS IN YET FOR 2022. SO DO THEY NEED TO GO BACK THROUGH THE PLANNING COMMISSION IF THEY'RE UPGRADING THEIR PLANS? I DON'T BELIEVE THEY'RE MAKING ANY CHANGES THAT HEATHER THEIR TO, TO WHAT HAS ALREADY BEEN APPROVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION. OKAY. THANK YOU. YES MA'AM. OKAY. SO WE HAVE CITIZENS COMMENTS. YEP. UH, FIRST STOP. WE HAVE MR. JIMMY SCARPELLI, IF YOU'D PLEASE COME TO VOTING TO THE LIST ONE, I DON'T GOOD. GOOD. UM, I ACTUALLY LIVE ON THE HARD PLACE. SO IF IT WAS DIRECTLY GOING TO AFFECT OUR ENTIRE ROAD, EVERYTHING ELSE, NEW BLACK GOING BACK THERE GONNA BE A LOT OF FOOT TRAFFIC, EVERYTHING ELSE COMING INTO OUR NEIGHBORHOOD. NOW THE HARSH WINDMILL ENTRANCE DOWN THERE, HE WAS GOING TO BE PAYING THE TAXES FOR EVERY, ALL THE STREET MAINTENANCE COMING IN THROUGH THERE, FROM RIVERSIDE INTO HERE. ARE THEY GOING TO HELP PAY FOR THAT? AND WHERE ARE THEY GONNA, YOU KNOW, SNOW REMOVAL, ALL THAT. SO, UH, BIG GUARDS THAT ARE BESIDES THAT FOOT TRAFFIC VIOLENT WITH ALL THE CRIME, EVERYTHING ELSE. I DON'T THINK IT'S A GREAT IDEA TO HAVE THAT PLANT BACK THERE OR MAKE A SEPARATION OR SOMETHING, BUT I KNOW IT'S GOTTA BE DEVELOPED, BUT, YOU KNOW, GO FROM THERE, NOT A BIG PUBLIC SPEAKER. SORRY. IT'S QUITE ALL RIGHT. THIS IS SOME KIND OF HOW THIS WORKS IS THE TIME FOR COMMENTARY. SO WE CERTAINLY WANT YOU GUYS TO BE ABLE TO, UH, SPEAK YOUR PIECE, SAY YOUR MIND, YOU KNOW, YOUR FEELINGS ABOUT ALL THIS. UM, AND I APPRECIATE YOU KIND OF DIRECTING ALL THE COMMENTS TOWARDS ME. AND CERTAINLY IF ANYONE ON COUNCIL THEN HAS FOLLOW-UP OR, UH, OR REDIRECT FOR YOU AND LIKE THAT, THEN CERTAINLY COUNSEL CAN GET INVOLVED AND ASK QUESTIONS. OR AT THAT POINT, ENTER INTO A CONVERSATION THEY WANT IN COUNCIL. THEY HAVE QUESTIONS. UH, THAT'S CERTAINLY FINE AS WELL. UM, I WOULD SAY, I GUESS, YOU KNOW, SO THE, THE ISSUE FOOT TRAFFIC, I REALIZED THERE'D BE NOTHING WE COULD, WE COULD DO ANYTHING ABOUT PEOPLE ON FOOT, UM, THE OTHER PROPERTY MAINTENANCE OR THE ROAD MAINTENANCE FOR THOSE 13 LOTS. I DON'T KNOW IF THERE'S A WAY TO SEPARATE THOSE 13 LOTS. AND I MEAN, THAT PARTICULAR AREA, THAT'S CITY OF DAYTON, THAT'S THEIR RESPONSIBILITY TO MAINTAIN THAT ROAD. YES. RIVERSIDE OF THAT PIECE. SO RIVERSIDE'S RESPONSIBLE TO MAINTAIN THAT CALLED TO SAC. UH, ANYTHING OUTSIDE OF THAT CULDESAC THAT GETS ONTO HARSHMAN VILLE PASS THE RIGHT CITY LINE. AND CERTAINLY THAT'S OUR RESPONSIBILITY IN THE FUTURE, THE SAME AS IT WOULD BE TODAY. SO I DON'T KNOW IF THERE'S A WAY TO DO ANY KIND OF, UH, AN ASSESSMENT ON THOSE 13 LOTS OR ANYTHING. I DON'T EVEN KNOW WHAT THAT WOULD BE, WHAT THAT PROCESS WOULD LOOK LIKE, BUT THAT'S CERTAINLY SOMETHING. YEAH. CAUSE THEY DON'T HAVE ANOTHER ACCESS POINT AND TO RIVERSIDE FROM THAT AREA. SO IT'S ALL OUR STREETS. WE ALL PAY TAXES ON THEM. SO, AND IF IT, AND I CERTAINLY WOULD BE MUCH, I MEAN, I TOTALLY UNDERSTAND IF THAT WAS A, YOU KNOW, A HUNDRED LOT DEVELOPMENT OR SOMETHING ALONG THERE, BUT IN THAT PARTICULAR CASE, WHAT'S ACCESSING THE ONLY ACCESS INTO HUBER HEIGHTS FROM EITHER OF THESE DEVELOPMENTS IS FOR 13 HOMES OTHER THAN THE OTHER THAN THE FOOT TRAFFIC. YES, WE CAN. I MEAN, THAT'S, IF THEY LIVE THERE AND THEY DECIDE THEY WANT TO GO WALK AND WALK IN YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD, YES, THERE WOULD BE, THERE'D BE NOTHING WE COULD DO TO STOP PEOPLE FROM WALKING. BUT AUTOMILE, AUTOMOBILE TRAFFIC IS GOING TO BE GENERATED FROM THOSE 13 LOTS ON THE RIVERSIDE, RIGHT. BECAUSE OF AS, AS, UM, MR. KELSEY STATED THE CRASH, GATE'S GOING TO GO UP AT LEE HAR TO MAKE SURE THAT NONE OF THE TRAFFIC FROM THE DAYTON PEACE IS GOING TO BE COMING INTO YOUR RIGHTS. RIGHT. AND I THINK THAT'S PROBABLY NEWER INFORMATION THAN MAYBE WHAT ANYBODY HAD HEARD. AND YOU GUYS MAY HAVE BEEN ASSUMING OR THINKING THAT ALL THAT TRAFFIC WAS GOING TO BE COMING UP INTO YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD, BUT THAT'S SOMETHING WE'VE PUT A STOP [00:30:01] TO HER THAT THE OFFICE, THE CITY MANAGERS PUT A STOP TO IN HIS COMMUNICATIONS WITH THE DAYTON PLANNER, THE RX, I KNOW A HARD PLACE, ONLY 23 FEET WIDE. I JUST, WHY DOES THAT STREET IS SO, BUT THEY'RE NOT. SO I GOT STUCK. I GET, THANK YOU. AND, AND JUST, UH, JUST TO FOLLOW UP, I THINK WE WERE ALSO KIND OF IN THE SAME SITUATION. SO YOU GUYS ALL UNDERSTAND THERE'S A NEW DEVELOPMENT DOWN IN CHAMBERSBURG THAT WAS KINDA GOING TO BACK UP TO ACTUALLY, RIGHT. WE'RE MR. AUTO LIFTS. AND PART OF THAT PROCESS WE WENT THROUGH WAS WE MADE THE DECISION NOT TO OPEN UP CONNECTIONS FROM ONE NEIGHBORHOOD THAT WAS EVEN IN YOUR BRIGHTS INTO ANOTHER NEIGHBORHOOD, SIMPLY BECAUSE OF THE SIZE OF THE ROADS AND WHAT WAS GOING ON. SO I THINK ALL OF US HERE FEEL MUCH BETTER KNOWING THAT ALL THAT TRAFFIC IS NOT GOING TO HAVE A PLACE TO GO INTO HEBREW HEIGHTS. ALL THE TRAFFIC ON THE DATE INSIDE HAS MAINTAINED TO THE DATE AND SIDE AND ACCESS OUT ONTO NEED MORE. AND THEN ON THE RIVERSIDE PIECE, THE ONLY PEOPLE HAVE ACCESS TO YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD. ARE, ARE THOSE 13 PARTICULAR, UH, LOTS ON THE RIVERSIDE PIECE. SO HOPEFULLY, HOPEFULLY THAT CLEARS OR CLARIFIES SOME OF THAT. SO THOSE THERE, EXCUSE ME. SO THOSE 13 LOTS HAVE NO ALTERNATIVE EXCEPT TO GO OUT TO, UM, BILL AND THEN OUT TO BRAND AND THEN OVER TO NEED MORE, IF THAT'S THE ROUTE THEY CHOOSE TO TAKE. YEAH. SO IT'S, I'M NOT MINIMIZING 13. I'M JUST SAYING THAT IT'S THE EFFECT. WE'RE JUST LOOKING AT WHAT THE FACTS ARE, THE EFFECT THAT ANY OF THIS HAS IS ARE THOSE 13 LOTS, THOSE 13 HOMES. YES. WELL, HOLD ON. OKAY, GLEN, DO YOU WANNA GO, ARE YOU GONNA WAIT TILL OTHER SOLAR OTHERS ARE FINISHED? I'LL BE REALLY QUICK. UM, I JUST WANTED TO, FOR THE SAKE OF TIME, JUST KIND OF ECHO NANCY'S COMMENTS. I FELT THE SAME WAY. I GOT A COMMUNICATION FROM A RESIDENT AND BY THE TIME I GOT INTO RESEARCHING AND SEEING WHAT WAS GOING ON AND WHERE THE PROCESS WAS, IT WAS LIKE, WELL, I DON'T EVEN KNOW WHAT I CAN DO ABOUT THIS. IT'S SAYS DEEP IN THE PROCESS IS PRETTY WELL DONE. UM, I WOULD HAVE APPRECIATED AS WELL IF WE KNEW EVEN BACK IN NOVEMBER, IF NOT A YEAR AGO, THAT WE AT LEAST HAD SOME, SOME NOTICE FOR FORESIGHT SO THAT WE COULD LOOK INTO THIS AND AT LEAST BE AWARE OF WHEN PEOPLE CONTACTED US, WHAT WE WERE TALKING ABOUT. SO I JUST WANT TO ECHO THOSE COMMENTS THAT I WOULD APPRECIATE THAT ADVANCE NOTICE AS WELL. THANK YOU. EXCELLENT. OKAY. THANK YOU. MA'AM MR. SCHAKOWSKY, COULD YOU CLARIFY THE PARK ACCESS? ARE THEY THOSE SEARCHING LOTS GOING TO HAVE ACCESS TO THE PARK OR IS THE, ANY OF THAT SUBDIVISION THAT'S GOING TO GO AND HAVE ACCESS TO THE PARK WALKING TRIP? LIKE, ARE THEY GOING TO ACCESS IN OUR WALKING TRAILS OR TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE? NONE OF THESE LOTS THAT WILL BE DEVELOPED FOR SINGLE FAMILY HOMES WILL HAVE ACCESS DIRECTLY INTO TOM CLOUD PARK. THAT'S NOTHING THAT THE DEVELOPER HAS APPROACHED US ABOUT, UH, IN ANY WAY, SHAPE OR FORM. THERE HAS BEEN DISCUSSION ABOUT ACCESSIBILITY TO THE PARK, UM, THROUGH THIS PORTION OF THE PROJECT DOWN HERE WITH A PEDESTRIAN FOOT BRIDGE AT THIS LOCATION, UM, WE HAVEN'T SAID YES, WE HAVEN'T SAID NO. THAT WAS PART OF THE CONVERSATION THAT WAS HAD WITH THE RIVERSIDE CITY MANAGER ABOUT WHAT THIS MIGHT LOOK LIKE. UM, IS THERE A POTENTIAL, A BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT AT THIS PARTICULAR LOCATION TO BRING ALL OF THIS INTO, UH, THE CITY OF HUBER HEIGHTS SINCE IT WOULD BE FOR RECREATIONAL PURPOSES AND NON-TAXABLE, UH, NON DEVELOPABLE, UM, INTEREST, UH, THERE IS A LOCATION I WANT TO SAY IT'S RIGHT HERE. I WANT TO SAY THERE'S A CUT RIGHT HERE IN THE GATE ON NORTHERN CIRCLE THAT ALSO ALLOWS FOR ACCESS INTO TOM CLOUD AT THIS, AT THIS PARTICULAR LOCATION. SO THOSE WOULD BE AT LEAST THIS WOULD BE THE LOCATION FOR THIS SUBDIVISION, BUT THAT IS A CONCEPTUAL THOUGHT NORTHERN CIRCLES, RIVERSIDE NORTHERN SORT GLUES. RIVERSIDE. YES. MA'AM THANK YOU FOR CLARIFYING IT. SURE. MARK BRYAN. YES, SIR. I'M SPEAKING JUST TO THE 13 LOTS. YES, SIR. HAVE WE DETERMINED AS A CITY THAT WE'RE REQUIRED TO HAVE ACCESS ON TO OUR ROAD? UH, I WOULD DEFER TO THE LAW DIRECTOR ON THAT PARTICULAR ISSUE, UH, LAW DIRECTOR, HAVE WE DETERMINED THAT WE'RE REQUIRED TO GIVE THEM ACCESS? IT'S NOT A VERY SETTLED, UM, AREA OF LAW BEING A PUBLIC ROAD, BUT GENERALLY SPEAKING, UM, WE CAN, IF IT'S A SINGLE FAMILY TRYING TO GET A CURB CUT. YES, WE DO THAT. IF IT'S A SUBDIVISION, UM, HISTORICALLY WE HAVE HAD SOME RIGHTS TO BLOCK IT AND SAY NO, BUT THE LAW IS NOT EXACTLY CLEAR, BUT THAT'S THE WAY IT'S BEEN IN THE PAST IS SIMPLY NOT ALLOW A SUBDIVISION TO ENTER INTO ANOTHER CITY. SO THEY WERE, IT'S A LAW THAT SUPPORTS NOT ALLOWING THE, THE CASE LAW GENERALLY SAYS, GO WITH THE IT'S A PUBLIC ROAD. IT SHOULD BE ACCESSIBLE BY OTHERS. THE PRACTICALITY OF IT, WHAT MOST COMMUNITIES DO IS THE OPPOSITE. AND THEN BRIAN, YES, SIR. IT IS RIVERSIDE DONATING THAT LAND TO US. THAT'S ADJACENT TO OUR PARK. UH, THE DEVELOPER [00:35:01] HAD SUGGESTED THAT THAT MIGHT BE AN OPTION. AND WAS THAT A COMPROMISE FOR ALLOWING THEM ACCESS TO OUR STREET? THAT WAS NOT, THAT WAS PART OF THE INITIAL PROPOSAL IS WE RECEIVED IT. SO THIS IS, UM, A COPY OF THE PLAN THAT CAME IN BACK ON NOVEMBER 2ND OR THIRD, WE HAVE NOT ALTERED IT INTO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, UH, THIS PLAN OR, UH, THE OTHER SHEET FROM DAYTON, UH, HAS MADE, UH, I'M NOT AWARE THAT EITHER OF THESE HAVE BEEN SUBSTANTIALLY ALTERED THROUGH THEIR PROCESS. SO JERRY, IF THE COUNCIL DECIDED NOT TO ALLOW ACCESS, WHAT PROCESS OR PROCEDURE WOULD YOU FOLLOW? UH, WE WOULD ADVISE RIVERSIDE. WE'RE NOT GOING TO ALLOW ACCESS AND THEY WOULD HAVE TO THEN TRY TO FIND ANOTHER WAY TO DEVELOP THAT PROPERTY MOST LIKELY BY A BRIDGE OVER THAT WATERWAY. OKAY. THANKS MAN. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? OKAY. HAVE MORE SPEAKERS NEXT UP. WE HAVE MS. AMANDA, HENRY, YOU PLEASE COME TO THE PLANET. HELLO. UM, I'M AMANDA. I LIVE AT 49 98 HUDSONVILLE. MY PROPERTY IS THE PROBABLY ONLY OWN HOME THAT WILL BE DIRECTLY AFFECTED BY THE JUST 13 HOMES THAT EVERYBODY KEEPS SPEAKING OF. UM, MY FAMILY HAS BEEN IN THIS HOUSE FOR OVER 30 YEARS AND IT IS SOLELY PURCHASED BECAUSE IT WAS ON A DEAD END STREET ON A CORNER LOT NOW TO YOU GUYS THAT MAY NOT SEEM LIKE MUCH CAUSE IT'S JUST 13 HOMES, BUT TO US THAT'S, I MEAN, THAT'S JUST COMPLETELY CHANGING OUR LIVES. OPENING UP THAT ROAD ON TOP OF THE FACT THAT FOR THE LAST 20 PLUS YEARS, WE HAVE MAINTAINED THE LAST 20 FEET OF THAT ROAD. THE CITY STOPPED PAVING IT OVER 20 YEARS AGO, WE HAVE MAINTAINED THAT ROAD. WE WEEDED IT, WE KILLED THE GRASS AND THEN WE MOW IT. IF IT OVERGROWS, IT STOPS AT MY SECOND DRIVEWAY, WE HAVE TWO DRIVEWAYS IT FOR WHATEVER REASON, THEY PAVED TO MY SECOND DRIVEWAY AND THEN JUST QUIT OVER 20 YEARS AGO. SO MY CONCERNS ARE, IF THERE'S AN ADDITIONAL 13 HOMES, YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT A MINIMUM OF 30 CARS ON THAT ROAD, THAT CAR HAS HAD NO MORE THAN AN AVERAGE OF FOUR CARS A DAY FOR THE LAST 50 PLUS YEARS. AND IT STILL HADN'T BEEN MAINTAINED WITH ONLY FOUR VEHICLES. SO NOW WE'RE GOING TO ADD AN ADDITIONAL 13 HOMES WITH A MINIMUM OF PROBABLY 30 CARS. WHO'S GOING TO PLOW THE ROADS. IF HUBER PILES TO JUST OUR LITTLE SECTION, THE ROAD CONTINUES, WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO DO? JUST PLOW RIVERSIDE IN. IF RIVERSIDE IS SUPPOSED TO PLOW THEIR COURT AND THEIR SECTION, WHAT ARE THEY GOING TO DO? DRIVE ALL THE WAY INTO HUBER HEIGHTS INTO THE NEIGHBORHOOD, THROUGH THE NEIGHBORHOOD, PASS MY HOUSE AND THEN DO THAT LITTLE COURT. I MEAN, IT JUST MAKES NO SENSE WHATSOEVER THAT EVEN THOUGH IT'S JUST 13 HOMES THAT THEIR ONLY ACCESS IS THROUGH OUR NEIGHBORHOOD, THAT'S ALREADY EXTREMELY CONGESTED WITH TRAFFIC. UM, AND AS YOU GUYS KNOW, WE HAVE THAT, YOU KNOW, THE BIG HALLOWEEN STUFF EVERY YEAR, THAT'S, THAT'S MY HOUSE. SO IT'S ALREADY RIDICULOUSLY TRAFFIC IN THE FALL. AND WE'RE GOING TO ADD COMPOUND ON TOP OF THAT. IF YOU KNOW, THEY'VE ALREADY NIXED THE LEHIGH ACCESS. SO NOW WE JUST HAVE THIS HARSHMAN BILL ACCESS FOR THESE 13 HOMES. WHAT IF THE DEVELOPER COMES BACK AND SAYS, YEAH, WE'RE GOING TO PUT A BRIDGE OVER THAT CREEK. SO NOW WE'RE GOING TO HAVE, BECAUSE IT'S ALREADY BEEN APPROVED TO ALLOW THE ARTS MOBILE ACCESS. CAN WE TURN AROUND AND GO BACK AND SAY, NO, WE'RE NOT ALLOWING 250 HOMES TO ACCESS THROUGH WASHMAN BILL, BECAUSE THAT'S MORE THAN LIKELY WHAT'S GOING TO HAPPEN. THIS MAN'S MAKING AN INVESTMENT FOR THESE 250 HOMES. AND WE'RE SAYING, YEAH, SURE. YOU CAN HAVE HARSHMAN BILL BECAUSE YOU KNOW WHAT? MY ROAD IS WIDE ENOUGH. IT'S A MAIN THOROUGHFARE THROUGH THE NEIGHBORHOOD, BUT THAT'S, THAT'S NOT FAIR TO EVERYBODY THAT LIVES RIGHT AROUND THERE TO HAVE THAT ADDITIONAL TRAFFIC TO HAVE THE ADDITIONAL STRESS OF WHO'S GOING TO MAINTAIN IT WHEN IT HASN'T EVEN BEEN MAINTAINED FOR 25 YEARS. ANYWAY. SO THAT'S MY CONCERNS TO YOU GUYS. THANK YOU SO MUCH. APPRECIATE YOU. THANK YOU. LAST UP. WE HAVE MR. JOHN BRYCE. I AM JOHN GRAY. SHOULD I LIVE AT 43 40 LONGFELLOW AVENUE? I GIVE YOU KUDOS FOR PRONOUNCING MY NAME, RIGHT. UM, I WANTED TO CLEAR ONE THING UP IS, UH, SOMEBODY SAID THAT JEFF GREEN, UM, MADE THE STATEMENT THAT NONE OF OUR RESIDENTS SHOWED UP AT THE DATE AND CITY MEETING. THAT'S NOT TRUE. I TALKED TO JEFF PERSONALLY AT LENGTH. I ALSO CHECKED, I ALSO TALKED TO THE DEVELOPER, LANCE OAKS AT LENGTH AND ASKED THEM A LOT OF QUESTIONS. AND IT SEEMS TO ME THERE'S SOME CONFUSION OVER THE 13 LOTS OR WHETHER THE WHOLE SUBDIVISION IS GOING TO BE EMPTYING ONTO HARSHMAN BILL. WHEN I WENT TO THE DATE AND CITY COUNCIL MEETING, I WAS UNDER THE IMPRESSION AFTER TALKING TO JEFF GREEN, SPECIFICALLY THAT LEE HAR [00:40:01] AND HUDSONVILLE WOULD BOTH BE ACCESSIBLE TO THE RESIDENTS OF THIS NEW SUBDIVISION. SO I HAVE DOUBTS ABOUT JUST THE 13 LOTS, AND I WOULD APPRECIATE IF SOMEBODY COULD GET THAT CLEARED UP. I WISH WE HAD THE INFORMATION HERE TODAY. I'M A LITTLE BIT DISMAYED THAT THERE'S NOT MORE INFORMATION ABOUT THAT, OR AT LEAST CLEAR INFORMATION. THIS MAN, THIS LADY SAYS, YOU KNOW, 13 LOTS, THIS GENTLEMEN SAYS THAT WASN'T HIS UNDERSTANDING. SO IT WOULD BE NICE IF WE COULD GET THAT CLEARED UP, BUT WE MIGHT HAVE TO HAVE, IF YOU'RE GIVING ME ONE SECOND, I'LL BRIAN. SO WHEN WAS THE DECISION LET'S SO LET'S, CAN WE CALL UP NOW? WHAT WAS THE DECISION MADE ABOUT THE CRASH GATE VERSUS WHEN THE PRIOR MEETING TOOK PLACE, WHERE IT WAS EXPLAINED TO ME THAT THERE WAS ACCESS TO, SO JUST A COUPLE OF POINTS OF CLARIFICATION. I MADE THE STATEMENT REGARDING ATTENDANCE OF CITIZENS AT THE MEETING, AND IT WASN'T THAT NONE OF OUR RESIDENTS ATTENDED THE MEETING. IT WAS NONE OF OUR RESIDENTS ATTENDED THE MEETING AND HAD ANYTHING NEGATIVE TO SAY ON THE RECORD. NOT THAT NO ONE FROM THE CITY ATTENDED, NOT ANY RESIDENT DIDN'T ATTEND. THE COMMENT WAS THAT NONE OF OUR RESIDENTS HAD A NEGATIVE COMMENT. I JUST WONDERED ALL YOU PEOPLE TO KNOW THAT WE ARE INTERESTED IN. SURE. AND, AND YOU KNOW, ONE OF THE THING, IF YOU DON'T MIND ME CONTINUING ON IS SOME OF THE RESIDENTS ON LONGFELLOW. I, THAT I KNOW DIDN'T RECEIVE ANY NOTICES FROM THE CITY OF DAYTON AND, UM, JIMMY WHO HERE EARLIER, THERE'S ONLY THREE HOUSES ON LEE HORROR. OH, THAT'S RIGHT. THE ONE SPACING. OKAY. YOU'RE RIGHT. THERE'S TWO HOUSES THERE IN ONE 50% OF THE RESIDENTS, DIDN'T GET A NOTICE TO GO TO THE MEETING. UM, HE FOUND OUT ABOUT IT THROUGH OTHERS, AROUND US, AND ACTUALLY HE PROBABLY HIM AND AMANDA ARE PROBABLY MORE DIRECTLY AFFECTED BY THIS THAN ANY OF THE REST OF US. UH, AND IF ONE THING JIMMY DIDN'T BRING UP AND I WANT TO POINT OUT ON HIS BEHALF, LEE HEART IS NOT WIDE ENOUGH. SO IT, UH, IF IT WERE TO BE EXPANDED TO ALLOW INGRESS AND EGRESS INTO THE SUBDIVISION, HIS DRIVEWAY WOULD HAVE TO BE SHORTENED AND HE CAN BARELY PARK HIS PICKUP TRUCK IN IT RIGHT NOW WITHOUT BLOCKING THE DRIVEWAY OR THE SIDEWALK. SO I WANTED TO JUST BEFORE I FORGOT THAT I WANTED TO BRING THAT UP. UM, SO RECAP IN THERE, I WOULD LIKE TO KNOW WHAT THE SPECIFICS ARE ABOUT THE INCREASE IN THE EGRESS. UH, AMANDA BROUGHT UP A POINT ABOUT, THERE'S ALREADY A LOT OF TRAFFIC AND CONGESTION ON LONGFELLOW AND SHE'S ABSOLUTELY RIGHT. UH, SOMETIMES AT FIVE O'CLOCK IN THE AFTERNOON, IT SEEMS LIKE ABOUT EVERY 10 TO 12 SECONDS, THE CAR PASSES BY A MAN THAT WHO WAS HAVING HIS GRASS CUT DIRECTLY ACROSS THE STREET FROM ME, THE MAN CUTTING HIS GRASS, GOT HIT BY A CAR AND JUST, THEY, THEY DRIVE DOWN THERE TOO FAST. AND I'VE OFTEN THOUGHT ABOUT CALLING THE POLICE AND ASKING THEM TO JUST PARK A SQUAD CAR THERE A COUPLE TIMES THAT WEEK TO SLOW PEOPLE DOWN. I'VE SEEN PEOPLE DO 60 AND 70, AND I'M NOT EXAGGERATING 16, 70 MILES PER HOUR DOWN OUR STREET. THEY USE IT AS A CUT-THROUGH FROM BRAND ALL THE WAY OVER TO OLD TROY. AND IT'S A RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD. THE SAME AS THE, ANY OF THE OTHER STREETS, 25 MILE PER HOUR SPEED LIMIT FIVE O'CLOCK IS THE WORST TIME, OF COURSE, BUT IT'S STILL HEAVY IN THE MORNING. SO WE'RE ALL WORKING CLASS PEOPLE, MOSTLY THAT LIVE ON THAT STREET AND WE'D GET UP. AND WE GO TO OUR JOBS EVERY DAY AND I WORRY ABOUT THE CHILDREN PLAYING IN THE STREETS. SOMETIMES I'VE HAD TO RUN LITTLE KIDS OFF THE STREET BEFORE SOME THAT, YOU KNOW, I, I JUST KNEW IT WAS GOING TO GET HIT BY A CAR. SO IF NOTHING ELSE COMES OUT OF THIS, AT LEAST, CAN WE HAVE A SQUAD CAR PARK ON OUR STREET EVERY ONCE IN A WHILE, COULD SOMEBODY CAN, YOU KNOW, TAKE A NOTE OF THAT. AND THEN THE LAST THING THAT I WANT TO MAYBE QUESTION OR BRING UP IS THE DRAINAGE ISSUE. SOME OF YOU PEOPLE PROBABLY AREN'T, BUT RIGHT WHERE LEE HORROR HITS LONGFELLOW AVENUE W ON PERIODS OF HEAVY DOWNPOURS, THE STORM SEWER HAS BECOME OVERWHELMED. WE'VE HAD TWO AND A HALF FEET. I'M NOT EXAGGERATING AGAIN, TWO AND A HALF FEET OF WATER BUILD UP IN ABOUT A HUNDRED FOOT SECTION THERE. AND I'VE SEEN CARS DRIVE RIGHT INTO IT AND BOGGED DOWN ONE OF OUR NEIGHBORS CANOED UP AND DOWN OUR STREET ONE TIME. AND, AND SOME OF YOU PROBABLY REMEMBER THAT, BUT, [00:45:01] BUT ANYHOW, IF YOU LOOK FROM MY BACK PATIO OUT INTO THE FIELD, AND I'VE BEEN PRIVILEGED TO LIVE THERE FOR 20 YEARS AND ENJOY THE WILDLIFE, YOU KNOW, I HATE TO SEE IT GO. THAT'S ANOTHER THING THAT REALLY TROUBLES ME ABOUT IT. I'VE SEEN ALL KINDS OF WILDLIFE OUT THERE, AND I LIKED THAT KIND OF THING. I BOUGHT THIS HOUSE BECAUSE I BACK UP TO THIS DEAL. SO IT'S A DISAPPOINTMENT TO ME NOW. UM, I'VE BEEN BLESSED TO HAVE IT FOR 20 YEARS, BUT I STILL HATE TO SEE IT GO. BUT ANYWAY, IF YOU LOOK OUT INTO THE FIELD, THAT FIELD KIND OF SLOPES TOWARDS MY HOUSE, AND THEN IF YOU GO NORTH IN HUBER HEIGHTS, IT ELEVATION IS COMING DOWN TOWARDS US. SO I HAVE A FEELING THAT WE'RE GETTING A LOT MORE, UM, STORMWATER THAN WHAT SOME, MAYBE THE OTHER SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOODS MIGHT BE GETTING. AND I'M CONCERNED, I'M, I'M REALLY CONCERNED ABOUT THIS SUBDIVISION AND WHERE ITS STORM SYSTEM IS GOING TO ENTER. IS IT GOING TO GO BACK OUT TOWARDS NEED MORE, OR IS IT GOING TO COME TOWARDS HUBER HEIGHTS? HAS ANYBODY MENTIONED THAT TO YOU? AND THAT'S ANOTHER QUESTION THAT WE NEED ANSWERED BECAUSE WE ALREADY GET OVER. IT'S HAPPENED. IT'S ONLY HAPPENED THREE TIMES IN THE 20 YEARS I'VE BEEN THERE. IT MIGHT'VE HAPPENED WHEN I WAS OUT OF TOWN OR SOMETHING. THERE MIGHT'VE BEEN A FEW MORE, BUT I KNOW FOR SURE, IT'S HAPPENED THREE TIMES IN A POURING DOWN RAIN. I'VE HAD TO GO OUT THERE AND STAND ON THE STREET AND STOP PEOPLE FROM DRIVING INTO IT. AND THERE'S ALREADY TWO CARS STUCK IN IT. SO IF SOMEBODY COULD PLEASE CHECK ON THE DRAINAGE SITUATION, THAT WOULD BE APPRECIATED. AND THAT'S ALL I GOT TO SAY, HAVE A GOOD EVENING. WELL, HOLD ON ONE SECOND, BUT BECAUSE MR. CAMPBELL HAD A COMMENT, BUT I ALSO WANTED TO CLARIFY WITH BRIAN AGAIN, ONE MORE TIME ABOUT THE TIMEFRAME OF THE CRASH GATE DISCUSSION VERSUS WHEN THE MEETING TOOK PLACE WITH THE DATE AND PLANNERS ON WHEN THEY WERE TELLING RESIDENTS THAT THAT ACCESS OR THAT EGRESS WAS OPEN. SO IF WE'VE MADE A DECISION, UH, OR IF OUR STAFF AND RMC MANAGERS MADE A DECISION TO PUT A CRASH GATE UP THERE TO ELIMINATE THAT, IF THAT CAME AFTER THAT DISCUSSION, WELL, THEN THAT CLARIFIES WHILE YOU BELIEVE ONE THING AND WHY WE'VE MADE A DECISION. IT'S NOT REALLY THAT I BELIEVE ONE THING NOW IT'S THAT I DON'T KNOW WHAT TO BELIEVE. AND THAT'S WHY I JUST WANT TO GET THAT CLEAR. SO LET, LET ME, IF I CAN SPEAK TO A FEW OF THE COMMENTS THAT HAVE BEEN MADE, BUT NOT JUST YOURS. SURE. SO WHEN THIS SUB, SO WHEN THIS PROJECT FIRST CAME ABOUT, UM, AND IT WAS BROUGHT TO OUR ATTENTION, RECOGNIZE THAT THERE IS A PROCESS, AND THIS IS A PROCESS THAT ALL MUNICIPALITIES HAVE. AND SO WE WANT TO BE MINDFUL OF THE PROCESS BECAUSE WE HAVE THESE ISSUES TOO, WITH DEVELOPMENTS THAT WE DO AND HOW THEY AFFECT OTHER COMMUNITIES AND HOW THEY AFFECT OTHER RESIDENTS. SO I WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT EVERYONE IS AWARE OF THE FACT THAT THERE IS NO INTENTION TO NOT INFORM OR TO INLAND FORM OR MISINFORMED ANYONE, REGARDLESS OF WHETHER OR NOT THEY'RE ON THIS DIOCESE OR, OR RESIDENT OF THIS COMMUNITY, OR AN INTERESTED PARTY, SIR, I'M SORRY. LET ME INTERRUPT. I DIDN'T, I DIDN'T MEAN TO INFER THAT, AND I KNOW THAT IT COULD HAVE BEEN A POSTAL MISTAKE. NOPE. AND I, AND I JUST WANT IT, AND I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT THEY HAVE THEM AND I'M NOT, AND I'M NOT DIRECTLY, I DO NOT BELIEVE YOU ARE INFERRING THAT I DO NOT BELIEVE YOU WERE IMPLYING THAT. I JUST WANT TO MAKE THAT STATEMENT, THAT THERE WAS A PROCESS THAT HAPPENS. THAT PROCESS INVOLVES THE RELEASE OF INFORMATION AT VARIOUS LEVELS AT VARIOUS TIMES. AND IT IS IMPORTANT AS AN ADMINISTRATOR THAT I ALLOWED THAT PROCESS TO HAPPEN JUST LIKE ADMINISTRATORS AND OTHER COMMUNITIES ALLOW THAT PROCESS TO HAPPEN, UH, HERE IN HUBER HEIGHTS. SO NO, NO, NO DIRECT IMPLICATION THAT YOU WERE INFERRING. ANYTHING. I JUST WANT TO MAKE THAT STATEMENT. NOW, SECOND OF ALL, WE HAD THE CONVERSATION, UM, SHORTLY AFTER, AND I DIDN'T DOCUMENT THE DATES BECAUSE THEY WERE IN PHONE CALLS, UM, THAT HAPPENED MONTHS AGO. BUT IN AND AROUND THE TIME THAT THESE INITIAL EMAILS CAME THROUGH CONVERSATIONS WERE HAD WITH THE CITY OF DAYTON PLANNING WITH THE DEVELOPER AND WITH HUBER HEIGHTS REGARDING IF THE CITY OF HUBER HEIGHTS OBJECTED TO THE CONNECTION AT LEE HAR WOULD DATE AND APPROVE THE SUBDIVISION WITH ONE ACCESS ON NEED MORE. AND WITH FIRE ACCESS ONLY THROUGH LEE HAR. SO WE HAD THAT CONVERSATION INITIALLY RIGHT OFF THE BAT. THAT WAS A CONVERSATION THAT WAS ALSO HAD EARLY ON WITH RIVERSIDE ABOUT WHETHER OR NOT THEY COULD PROVIDE FIRE ACCESS OFF OF NORTHERN CIRCLE IN THE EVENT THAT WE CLOSED, UH, LEE HART, A PUBLIC ACCESS AS WELL, ALL PARTIES AGREED THAT IT WOULD BE POSSIBLE TO ALLOW FOR THE SINGLE POINT OF ACCESS FOR THE MAJORITY OF THE SUBDIVISION ON NEED, MORE PROVIDED. WE COULD, UH, ALLOW FOR PUBLIC SAFETY ACCESS AT LEE HAR AND OR OFF OF NORTHERN CIRCLE. BASED ON THAT INITIAL CONVERSATION, OUR POSITION THEN WAS TO SIT BACK AND ALLOW THE PROCESS TO GO AND WAIT AND DETERMINE [00:50:01] WHETHER OR NOT RESIDENTS, IF HUBER HEIGHTS OBJECTED TO THIS PARTICULAR PROJECT, THE PROJECT ITSELF, THE NOTIFICATIONS, JUST SO THAT YOU'RE AWARE OF THE NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS ON THE DATE AND SIDE ARE SUBJECT TO PROVISIONS OF THE OHIO REVISED CODE. AND SO IT'S ONLY 250 FEET IN RELATION TO THE PROPERTY, WHICH IS WHY SOME PEOPLE RECEIVED THE NOTIFICATION, BUT OTHER PEOPLE DID NOT REGARDING THE RIVERSIDE PARCEL. I'M AWARE THAT, UM, THAT REQUIRED A REZONING, WHICH IS WHY MAYBE FOR THOSE FOLKS, UM, NEAR AND AROUND THAT PARTICULAR PROJECT, UH, THEY DID NOT RECEIVE NOTIFICATION. NOW, I DON'T KNOW WHO ALL RECEIVED NOTIFICATION. ALL WE WERE PROVIDED WAS A LIST OF WHO WAS NOTIFIED IN ASSOCIATION WITH THIS PROJECT, BUT I DON'T KNOW WHETHER OR NOT THOSE WERE DELIVERED IN ANY PARTICULAR WAY OR WHAT THAT ASPECT WAS ONLY THAT THE REQUIREMENT OF THE LAW WAS FOLLOWED TO MAKE THE NOTIFICATION WITH RESPECT TO, UM, THE CONFIGURATION OF THE SUBDIVISION FROM THE POINT OF TIME THAT WE HAD THIS PROJECT DELIVERED TO, TO HUBER HEIGHTS FOR US, FOR OUR KNOWLEDGE AND OUR INFORMATION UP UNTIL APPROVALS OR PENDING APPROVALS. THAT CONFIGURATION THAT IS DEMONSTRATED HERE, WHICH IS THIS SECTION HERE IN RIVERSIDE AND THESE 13 LOTS, AND THESE LOTS HERE, WHICH IS LIKE 150 SOMETHING, I BELIEVE THIS CONFIGURATION, HE HAD THE TOTAL, THE TOTAL PROJECT IS 160 IS WHAT IT IS. SO IF YOU WERE TO, BUT YEAH, SO THE, THE, BUT THIS TOTAL CONFIGURATION, UM, HASN'T CHANGED. SO WHEN WE TALK ABOUT ACCESS ON, UM, TO HARSMAN VILLE, THE INFORMATION THAT CITY OF DAYTON HAS PROVIDED TO ME AND THROUGH OUR OFFICE, THIS IS THE PLAN THAT HAS BEEN SUBMITTED. THIS IS THE PLAN THAT HAS BEEN APPROVED. THERE IS NO CONNECTION TO BRIDGE NOW TO BRIDGE THIS CREEK AND NOW DUMP 200 AND SOME ODD CARS OUT ONTO HARSHMAN ADVIL BECAUSE WE'VE CLOSED OFF LEHIGH. ADDITIONALLY, IN AN EMAIL THAT WAS SENT ON, UM, AND AN EMAIL COMMUNICATION THAT WAS SENT OUT, WE SPECIFICALLY ADVISED, UM, THAT, UM, IN THE EVENT THAT THEY DID ATTEMPT THAT THE DEVELOPER DID ATTEMPT TO BRIDGE. NOT THAT THEY'RE PLANNING TO NOW, NOT THAT THEY'VE SUBMITTED A PLAN, BUT IF THE DEVELOPER ATTEMPTS TO RECONFIGURE THESE LOTS AND BRIDGE THE CREEK TO MAKE THE RECONFIGURATION. SO THOSE LOTS, SO ALL OF THE PROPERTY WOULD DUMP OUT ONTO HARSHMAN VILLE. WE WOULD ALSO SHUT HARSHMAN VILLE. NOW WE DO NOT KNOW OF A PLAN TO DO THAT. WE DO NOT KNOW THAT THE DEVELOPER'S INTENDING TO DO THAT, BUT IF THE DEVELOPER AMENDS THE PLAN AT ANY POINT IN TIME TO PUSH ALL THOSE LOCKS OUT ONTO HARSH MIDVILLE, THEN WE WILL ALSO CLOSE THE HARSHMAN VILLE ACCESS TO PUBLIC SAFETY ONLY. SO THIS IS THE PLAN, AS WE KNOW IT, BOTH SIDES. AND SO FAR, WE HAVE OPENLY COMMUNICATED WITH BOTH PARTIES ABOUT OUR INTENT IN THE EVENT, THEY MAKE ANY SIGNIFICANT RECONFIGURATIONS TO THIS, TO THIS PROJECT. OKAY. SO I HOPE THAT ADDRESSES EVERYONE'S COMMENTS. AND MA'AM TO YOUR POINT EARLIER ABOUT THE 13 LOTS, I'M NOT TRYING TO MINIMIZE THE 13 LOTS. I ONLY WANT IT TO CLARIFY WITH RESPECT TO THE CONVERSATION BACK AND FORTH ABOUT HOW MANY LOTS WERE ASSOCIATED WITH THIS PARTICULAR CONNECTION. I RECOGNIZE THAT 13 LOTS FROM YOUR PERSPECTIVE MIGHT AS WELL BE 300 LOTS. AND IF I WAS IN YOUR POSITION, I WOULD HAVE A SIMILAR FEELING AND I WOULD HAVE A SIMILAR PERSPECTIVE OF THIS PROJECT. SO PLEASE DON'T THINK THAT MY REFERENCE TO ONLY 13 LOTS IS TO MINIMIZE WHAT THIS PROJECT MEANS TO YOU. I ONLY REFERENCED THOSE 13 LOTS BECAUSE THEY ARE THE ONLY 13 LOTS THAT ARE ACCESSING THAT PARTICULAR LOCATION, NOT 200 AND SOME, NOT 400, SOME, NOT 150. JUST THOSE, JUST THOSE 13. SO I, I RECOGNIZE, I RECOGNIZE YOUR CONCERN. I THINK COUNCIL CLEARLY RECOGNIZE YOUR CONCERN. NO ONE HERE IS TRYING TO MINIMIZE THAT FOR OUR COMMENTS. WE JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT THERE IS CLARITY OF WHAT THESE IMPACTS ARE, PERIOD. THANKS FOR YOUR TIME. THANK YOU VERY MUCH, MR. CAMPBELL. YES. UH, BRIAN, JUST TO CATCH UP, THE STAFF HAS NOT BEEN AUTHORIZED NOR HAVE YOU GIVEN ANY AUTHORIZATION TO CURB CUT OR ACCESS HARSHMAN ADVIL OR ANY OTHER STREET IN RIVER HEIGHTS ARE POSITIONED OUR POSITION AT THE STAFF LEVEL ON BEHALF OF THE CITY TO THIS POINT HAS BEEN, WE D WE HAVE NOT OFFERED AN OBJECTION TO THE CONNECTION AS IT IS PROPOSED HERE. NOT THAT WE WON'T CHANGE OUR MIND, NOT THAT WE CAN'T CHANGE OUR MIND, BUT BASED ON THE INFORMATION THAT WE HAVE TO ASSESS, WE DON'T HAVE A REASON TO [00:55:01] OBJECT AT THIS POINT IN TIME. AND YOU ALSO DON'T HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO OKAY. AND APPROVE IT EITHER. CORRECT. ULTIMATELY, THAT IS A DECISION THAT CITY COUNCIL WOULD MAKE IF THEY CHOSE TO MAKE THAT DECISION. AND YOU'RE NOT TONIGHT PREPARED TO GIVE US A STAFF RECOMMENDATION TO ACCESS HARSHMAN ADVIL, CORRECT? YEP. UH, JERRY, IF I UNDERSTOOD YOU CORRECTLY, WE CAN DENY THE ACCESS ONTO HARSHMAN VILLE. YES. WE WOULDN'T BE CLOSED BAYER. UM, I RECORD YOU HARSHMAN VILLE. I'M SORRY THAT MAYOR, I REPRESENT THIS WARD AND I DON'T CARE IF IT WAS THREE HOUSES, I'M OPPOSED TO THAT. AND I WOULD ASK MY COLLEAGUES TO OPPOSE IT AS WELL. UM, AND I DON'T KNOW HOW WE DO THAT. UH, WE CAN'T OBVIOUSLY VOTE AT A WORK SESSION, BUT, UH, IF WE CAN PUT OUR HEADS TOGETHER AND COME UP WITH A SOLUTION, WOULD THERE BE, UM, LEGISLATION THAT BE PROPOSED AS A RESOLUTION TO THE ACCESS THERE, OR IS IT JUST DIRECTION THAT WE COULD GIVE BY MOTION TO DIRECT SAY, MANAGER TO LET, UH, THAT'D BE WHAT, SO LET RIVERSIDE KNOW THAT THAT IS GOING TO BE, BUT THAT'S GOING TO BE SHUT OFF AS WELL. THAT ACCESS IS DENIED. SO I THINK SOMEBODY SPENT A LOT OF MONEY ON THIS PROJECT. WELL, AND IF THEY KNEW THEY WEREN'T GOING TO HAVE ACCESS, I DON'T THINK SOMEONE WOULD HAVE DESIGNED THOSE 13 HOMES. SO I THINK SOMEONE BELIEVES THEY'RE GOING TO HAVE ACCESS ON HARSHMAN VILLE. UH, I THINK AT THIS POINT IN TIME, WE CAN, I AM HAPPY TO COMMUNICATE THAT BASED ON THE INFORMATION THAT WE'VE LEARNED AND THE COMMUNICATION THAT'S BEEN PRESENTED IN SOME OF THE POINTS THAT WERE BROUGHT UP TONIGHT, THAT THE CITY DOES HAVE NOW CONCERNS WITH RESPECT TO THE, UM, 13. AND THAT'S WHERE I WAS GOING WITH ALL THIS AT THE BEGINNING OF YOUR COMMENTS. ISN'T THAT WHAT YOU SAID? YES, SIR. YOU TOLD THEM THAT IF WE RECEIVED COMMENT FROM OUR CITIZENS, THAT IT WOULD BE A GAME CHANGER, CORRECT. AND THEN THERE WERE SOME LEGITIMATE COMMENTS BROUGHT UP, UM, TONIGHT WITH RESPECT TO, UH, THE, THE END OF THE CONDITION OF, UM, OF HARSH MIDVILLE. THERE WAS THE STORM WATER ISSUE THAT WAS BROUGHT UP. NOW, SOME OF THAT INFORMATION MAY BE FLUSHED OUT THROUGH THAT PROCESS AND WE WILL CONTINUE TO FOLLOW THAT AND ASK FOR THE INFORMATION APPROPRIATE TO ADDRESS THESE MATTERS. WELL, THERE, THERE'S LOTS OF QUESTIONS ON THOSE 13 LOTS. LIKE WHO'S GOING TO SERVICE THEM IN A PUBLIC ASPECT, PUBLIC SAFETY ASPECT. SO TYPICALLY IN THESE TYPES OF SITUATIONS, UM, WE WILL, AS MUNICIPALITIES, WE WILL MUTUALLY AGREE TO SWAP SERVICE AREAS. AND IF THAT WAS COMMERCIAL, WE WOULD HAVE, WHAT WOULD YOU REFER TO AS A SHARED ACCESS? UH, JERRY, LIKE WE HAVE IN FRONT OF A CAMPING WORLD AND THE PEOPLE THAT OWN OR ACCESS ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT, WHO'S GOING TO MAINTAIN AN EASEMENT. YEAH, YEAH. YEAH. WHERE ARE YOU GOING TO HAVE SHARED ACCESS AND, AND WHO'S GOING TO MAINTAIN WHAT, UM, YEAH, THAT FATEFUL WAS AN EASEMENT OR A PRIVATE ROAD THAT, UH, WELL, THEY SURE NEED AN EASEMENT CAUSE THEY'RE GOING TO BE PULLING ON TO OUR, OUR PARK ROAD. SO WE HAVEN'T MADE ANY PROMISES TO ANYONE. THIS SHOULDN'T COME TO A SURPRISE TO ANYONE. RIGHT. BECAUSE THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT YOU PROMISED THEM AT THE BEGINNING. CORRECT. I'M JUST SHOCKED THAT SOMEBODY WOULD SPEND THAT TYPE OF ENGINEERING AND DRAWING MONEY BEFORE THEY KNEW THEY HAD ACCESS ON HARSHMAN ADVIL. I'M NOT FOR IT. OKAY, DON, THANK YOU MIRROR. JUST FOR A POINTED DISCUSSION. I KNOW WE'RE NOT THERE YET. UM, IT'S OBVIOUS WHY THOSE 13 LOTS ARE LAID OUT THE WAY THEY ARE AND WHY THEY'RE REQUESTING ACCESS ONTO HARSHMAN BILL TYPOGRAPHY CALLS FOR IT, AS OPPOSED TO PUTTING IN THE, UH, BRIDGE TO CONNECT INTO, TO THE REST OF THE DEVELOPMENT. SO AS A POINT OF DISCUSSION, I WOULD JUST LIKE TO SAY THAT I WOULD AGREE WITH COUNCILMAN CAMPBELL. I WOULD NOT BE IN FAVOR OF ANY CONNECTION, UH, OF ANY TYPE ON THOSE 13 ACRES, UH, NEEDS TO FIND HER ON, UH, LAUNCH, UM, DEVELOP FURNITURE, FIND A DIFFERENT WAY TO MAKE THAT WORK. I'M NOT IN FAVOR OF THE CONNECTION AND DROP OUR NEIGHBORHOOD, GLEN. UM, I WOULD ALSO JOIN MR. CAMPBELL AND OBJECTION, I, I ACTUALLY KIND OF FIND IT KIND OF BIZARRE THAT YOU WOULD HAVE TO LEAVE THE CITY OF YOUR RESIDENCE TO COME INTO ANOTHER CITY TO GO INTO YOUR HOUSE BACK INTO YOUR CITY OF RESIDENCE. IT JUST DOESN'T MAKE SENSE TO ME. UM, SO YEAH, I'M, I'M FULLY WITH MR. KIM. I DON'T THINK THAT'S A, UH, AN APPROPRIATE CONNECTION FOR, UH, FOR A CUL-DE-SAC STREET LIKE THAT, THAT DOESN'T EVEN HAVE A ACTUAL STREET CONNECTION TO THE CITY OF RESIDENCE, [01:00:03] NANCY. YES. UM, AND I AGREE, UM, WITH MR. KAO BOWL, UM, AND I WOULD ASK ONE OTHER THING, UM, MR. IS IF WE COULD GET THE WORD BACK TO, TO DATE AND WHEN THEY DO THE, UH, TRAFFIC STUDY AND THE STORMWATER STUDY THAT THEY WOULD INCLUDE THAT PORTION OF HUBER HEIGHTS IN THERE, BECAUSE ESPECIALLY WITH THE STORMWATER ISSUE THAT THEY ALREADY EXPERIENCED, SOMETIMES THESE DEVELOPERS COME IN AND ONLY ASSESS THE PROPERTY THAT THEY'RE DEVELOPING. THEY DON'T REALLY LOOK BEYOND THOSE BOUNDARIES. AND I THINK IN THIS CASE, WE NEED TO LOOK BEYOND THE BOUNDARIES TO MAKE SURE THAT WE'RE NOT MAKING IT WORSE. AND IF, UH, YEAH, WE'RE NOT MAKING IT WORSE. SO IF YOU COULD PLEASE PASS THAT INFORMATION ONTO JEFF AND ASK HIM TO MAKE SURE I'M HAPPY TO PASS THAT MESSAGE ON. THANK YOU. SURE. OKAY. THANK YOU. MA'AM UM, LET ME CIRCLE BACK TO WHAT MRS. HENRY SAID, THERE'S PART OF HARSHER MILL. IT WASN'T PAVED. WE LOOKED INTO THAT AND MAKE SURE THAT WE, IF IT'S OURS OR MAINTENANCING IT. AND THEN ALSO IF THE, UM, POLICE PATROLS COULD MAYBE PASS THROUGH THERE AND YOU'VE GOT THE JD DOES THIS YEAR. THAT'S WHAT, YOU'RE A STAR. THANK YOU, MR. . OKAY. SO JUST FROM, SO FROM DIRECTION MOVING FORWARD, IS THERE ANY, ANY FORMAL ACTION OF COUNSELING TO TAKE OR BRIAN, IS THIS SOMETHING YOU CAN HANDLE WITH THE CONVERSATIONS BACK TO TODAY? WAS THEM RIVERSIDE IN THE MIDDLE OF THIS? JUST, THIS IS NOT GOING TO HAVE A COUNCIL SUPPORT TO BE ABLE TO ALLOW ANY KIND OF ACCESS AND THEN WHERE IT STOPPED THERE OR WHATEVER THE PROCESS IS THAT THE DEVELOPER WOULD DO. UM, WE, I THINK THERE'S ENOUGH CONVERSATION HERE. I THINK THERE'S ENOUGH COMMENTARY HERE THAT WE DON'T NEED ANY FORMAL DIRECTION TO PASS ON YOUR NECESSARY TO PASS ON TO, TO RIVERSIDE AND TO THE DEVELOPER TO SAY THAT THERE IS A CONCERN FROM OUR PERSPECTIVE, WITH RESPECT TO THIS CONNECTION, UH, AS OF THIS MEETING, UH, AND THAT WE WOULD LIKE THE DEVELOPER TO LOOK AT AN ALTERNATIVE ACCESS PLAN OR AN ALTERNATIVE DEVELOPMENT ARRANGEMENT TO ALLOW FOR, UH, NO CONNECTION AT THIS PARTICULAR LOCATION. UH, AND THEN WE'LL SEE WHERE THAT TAKES US. WE'LL ALSO MAKE MENTION OF THE PARTICULAR STORM WATER ISSUES THAT MS. BERG BROUGHT UP AND WE'LL LOOK AT SOME OF THESE OTHER MATTERS INTERNALLY, AND THEN WE'LL SEE WHAT THAT GENERATES AND RESPONSE FROM THOSE CITIES AS WELL AS FROM THE DEVELOPER. OKAY. THANKS, BRIAN. SURE. TELL YOU, DO YOU HAVE ANY OTHER, ANY OTHER COMMENTS FROM ANYONE? NO, SIR. OKAY. SO JUST THANK YOU ALL FOR COMING. APPRECIATE YOU BEING HERE AND, AND, UH, SPEAKING UP AND SAYING WHAT YOU WANTED TO SAY. I THINK CLEARLY OF THIS, COUNCIL'S HEARD, UM, HEARD WHAT YOU SAID, AND I THINK WE CAN HAVE A GOOD WAY TO MOVE FORWARD YET, DON, I'M SORRY, GO AHEAD. UH, JUST ONE QUICK POINT, BRIAN, I KNOW WE'RE ALL AWARE OF IT HERE ON COUNCIL. WE'VE HEARD THE TERM A LOT. WOULD YOU MIND JUST GIVING A, UM, UH, MILE HIGH OVERVIEW OF WHAT A CRASH GATE DOES AND WHY? UH, YEAH, SURE. SO, UM, A CRASH DATE EFFECTIVELY IS, UM, IT'S A MECHANICALLY DESIGNED, UH, ACCESS POINTS TO ALLOW IT'S CALLED A CRASH GATE BECAUSE IT'S DESIGNED TO BREAK UNDER THE FORCE OF, UM, UH, FIRE APPARATUS OR AN EMERGENCY APPARATUS, THE PUSH BUMPER ON THE FRONT OF A POLICE CAR. SO IT'S DESIGNED TO BREAK OPEN UNDER PRESSURE FROM THOSE PARTICULAR VEHICLES TO ALLOW ONLY THOSE VEHICLES ACCESS INTO OR THROUGH A PARTICULAR WAY. UM, AND SO THAT'S WHAT WE REFER TO IN MOST INSTANCES THERE, UM, IN THIS DAY AND AGE, THE, UH, WE HAVE KEYS THAT WE USE TO ACCESS THOSE THAT ARE RELATIVELY UNIVERSAL, BUT THAT'S WHY THEY'RE REFERRED TO AS CRASH GATES BECAUSE THEY'RE DESIGNED TO COLLAPSE UNDER THE COLLISION FORCE FROM A FIRE APPARATUS OR A, OR AN AMBULANCE OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT. SO, YEAH. THANKS FOR CLARIFICATION. UM, IF I'M LOOKING AT THEIR CALENDAR CORRECTLY, BRIAN, IT LOOKS LIKE THE NEXT CITY COULD HAVE A CITY COUNCIL MEETING IN RIVERSIDE IS ON THE 17TH. SO W IF WE HAVE AN OBJECTION, WOULDN'T IT BE PRUDENT TO PASS THAT ONTO THEM. AND WE JUST MET HIM. IT'S MY INTENT TO DO SO TOMORROW MORNING, AS WELL AS MY COMMUNICATION ON LETTERHEAD REITERATING THE EMAIL. I SAID LAST WEEK ABOUT THE CRASH GATE AT LEE HART. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. OKAY. THANK YOU ALL AGAIN. YOU'RE WELCOME TO STAY. [ An Ordinance Decreasing The Sewer Rates In Section 934.03 Of The Codified Ordinances Of Huber Heights And Increasing The Water Rates In Section 934.02 Of The Codified Ordinances Of Huber Heights. (second reading)] NEXT UP. WAS I NUMBER 10 PENDING BUSINESS ITEM 10, A AN ORDINANCE DECREASING THE SEWER RATES AND SECTION 9 3 4 0.03 OF THE CODIFIED ORDINANCES OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND INCREASING THE WATER RATES AND SECTION 9 3 4 0.02 OF THE CODIFIED ORDINANCES OF HEBREW RIGHTS AT THE SECONDARY RYAN COMMENTS. I JUST WANT TO SAY, I DID NOT REALIZE HOW MUCH IT COUNCIL MEANS TO US AS CITIZENS TO VOICE AND TO SEE, OKAY, WE'LL TAKE A LOOK AT IT. THANK YOU FOR BRINGING IT TO US. [01:05:01] THANK YOU FOR BRINGING IT TO US. YES. I KNOW I'VE GOT PICTURES OF THE KIDS OUT THERE PLAYING LIKE THEY'RE FISHING. IT'S A LITTLE SILLY, BUT ANYWAY, I APOLOGIZE, BUT I REALLY DO APPRECIATE THIS COUNSELING PERIOD. THANK YOU. THANK YOU, TOM. IT'S BRIAN. I'M SORRY, SIR. WITH RESPECT TO APPENDIX ITEM TEN EIGHT. UH, YES, SIR. UH, ITEM 10 A YES, THIS IS, UH, THE LEGISLATION THAT WOULD, UH, INCREASE THE WATER RATES AND DECREASE THE SEWER RATES, UH, AFFECTING A NET ZERO IMPACT TO OUR, UH, OUR USERS, UH, SO THAT WE CAN TRANSITION SOME OF THE, UH, REOCCURRING SURPLUS FROM THE SEWER FUND TO THE WATER FUND. SO WE CAN USE THAT SURPLUS TO EXPAND OUR WATER MAIN REPLACEMENT PROGRAM IN THE FUTURE. YES. THANK YOU. BRIAN WORKS. THAT'S THE RECOMMENDATION LIST. SO NOT THAT I'M THE SEATING. IS THERE A MOTION DONE? SECOND DISCUSSION GLENN, UH, BRIAN REAL QUICK. I JUST WANTED TO ASK ON THIS ONE. UM, I KNOW WE'VE DISCUSSED IT. I KNOW IT IS WHAT IT'S DESIGNED TO DO, BUT WE'VE ALSO RECEIVED CORRESPONDENCE FROM YOU CONCERNING, UH, UH, UPCOMING INCREASES IN COSTS THROUGH, UM, OUR WATER COMPANY AND THE NECESSITY TO HAVE A SLIGHT INCREASE AS WELL. WOULD WE BE ABLE TO PACKAGE THIS INTO JUST ONE PIECE RATHER THAN DOING TWO SEPARATE ONES? I MEAN, VISUALLY IT CERTAINLY LOOKS A WHOLE LOT BETTER THAN BACK TO BACK INCREASES. UM, IF IT'S JUST PUT TOGETHER AS A SINGLE THING THAT COVERS IT ALL, AND WE'RE DONE WITH THE LEGISLATION AFFECTING THE WATER RATE INCREASE IS LEGISLATION THAT WAS ALREADY ADOPTED BY COUNCIL AND EMPOWERS THE CITY MANAGER TO DO SO PURSUANT TO THE CONSUMER PRICE INDEX WITHOUT FURTHER LEGISLATION FROM COUNCIL. SO THE WAY THAT THESE, THIS LEGISLATION IS SET UP TO MATCH THE RATE INCREASE, EVERY RESIDENT SHOULD, EVERY USER SHOULD EXPECT TO SEE THIS INCREASE LOOKING LIKE THE CONSUMER PRICE INDEX MODIFICATION, AS OPPOSED TO THE CON THE, THE, THE CUMULATIVE EFFORT THAT WE'RE SEEING, IF THAT MAKES SENSE. OKAY. YES. THANK YOU. OKAY. AND THE DISCUSSION. YES. THANK YOU, BRIAN. YES. UM, WITH THIS PARTICULAR, UM, LEGISLATION, UH, YOU SAID WE'RE MOVING THE PERCENTAGES, SO WE PUT MORE MONEY INTO THE WATER FUND AS OPPOSED TO THE SUPERFUND, BECAUSE WE DON'T USE THE SEWER FUND, OBVIOUSLY I'M GUESSING, BUT WE DON'T USE THE SEWER FUND AS MUCH. AND WE USE THE WATER FUND MUCH MORE, CORRECT. THE, THE SEWER FUND HAS GENERATED A CONSISTENT SURPLUS FOR SEVERAL YEARS AND HAS AN ADEQUATE FUND TO BALANCE THE WATER FUND. IT DOES NOT. THAT'S WHY WE'RE MAKING THAT CHANGE. AND IN THE NET ZERO IT'S BASED ON USAGE, BUT, UM, I'VE AGREED WITH THIS. I THINK THIS IS GOOD PLAN. UM, BUT TO THE EMAIL YOU SENT OUT ABOUT THE 3%, UM, PRICE INDEX INCREASE, UM, HOW MUCH MONEY DO WE HAVE IN THE GENERAL FUND OR PRO, OR EXCUSE ME, THE WATER FUND, APPROXIMATELY. I DON'T HAVE THAT NUMBER OFF THE TOP OF MY HEAD. I'D HAVE TO LOOK THAT UP. OKAY. WOULD IT STILL BE AROUND ABOUT 7 MILLION FROM A 2021? I'M SORRY, SORRY, I CAN'T ANSWER THAT QUESTION. I'D HAVE TO LOOK THAT INFORMATION. YEAH. UM, MAYOR, UH, OR TONY, COULD YOU GET THAT INFORMATION TO ME, UH, SHOULD BE IN THE MARIJUANA, THE BALANCE, THE CURRENT BALANCE ON THE WATERFRONT. YES, PLEASE. AND THAT COULD BE, YOU KNOW, RELATIVELY LAST COUPLE OF MONTHS. UM, JUST DOUBLE CHECK. UM, I THINK THE, WHEN I CHECKED IT ON ONLINE WITH THE CHECKBOOK, I BELIEVE THE NUMBER WAS I JUST GOING TO SAY 7 MILLION. UM, BUT, UH, IF YOU CAN GET THAT TO THE MAYOR, IF THE, UM, IF THE BALANCE OF THE WATER FUND IS STILL, UM, THAT AMOUNT OF MONEY OR CLOSE TO IT, AND, UH, I CAN'T SUPPORT THAT 3% INCREASE AT THIS TIME. OKAY. THANK YOU, TONY, FOR GIVING ME THAT INFORMATION. THANK YOU FOR, I HAVE A DISCUSSION. OKAY. MR. ROGERS, MR. CAMPBELL. YES. MRS. BERG. YES. MR. OTTO. YES. MR. LYONS. YES. MR. WEBB, THIS BAKER. YES. AND MOTION CARRIES SIX TO ZERO. [ An Ordinance Amending Chapter 738 – Massage Therapy Establishments, Sections 738.01, 738.02, And 738.03 Of The Huber Heights Codified Ordinances To Permit Certain Certified Massage Practitioners. (second reading)] AND NEXT UP IS ITEM 10. ITEM CAN BE AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 7, 3 8 MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENT SECTION 7 3 8 0.0173 8.0273 8.03 OF THE HUBER HEIGHTS, CODIFIED ORDINANCES TO PERMIT CERTAIN CERTIFIED MASSAGE PRACTITIONERS AT THE SECOND READING BRIAN COMMENTS. UH, YES. THANK YOU, MR. MAYOR, THIS ORDINANCE IS TO, UH, ALLOW FOR NON-MEDICAL LEGITIMATE MASSAGE, UH, OPERATIONS TO OCCUR WITHIN THE CITY OF, OF HUBER HEIGHTS, UH, YET PROVIDING THE NECESSARY LIMITATIONS AND RESTRICTIONS TO PROCLUDE ELICIT OR IMPROPER ACTIVITIES ASSOCIATED WITH MASSAGE. THANKS, FRANK, IS THERE A MOTION [01:10:01] MR. CAMPBELL MOTION TO ADOPT? IS THERE A SECOND? THIS IS BIRCH SECOND. I HAVE A MOTION. AND THE SECOND, IS THERE ANY DISCUSSION FURTHER ON THIS SIDE, MR. ROGERS, MRS. BERG? YES. MR. OTTO. YES. MR. LYONS, MR. WEBB, MS. BAKER. YES. MR. CAMPBELL. YES. MOTION CARRIES SIX TO ZERO. NEXT IS ITEM [ An Ordinance To Approve A Rezoning To Planned Residential And A Basic Development Plan For The Property Located At 6502 Old Troy Pike And Further Identified As Parcel Number P70 04004 0003 On The Montgomery County Auditor’s Tax Map And Accepting The Recommendation Of The Planning Commission (Zoning Case 21-34). (sixth reading)] 10 TENANCY ITEM 10. SEE AN ORDINANCE TO APPROVE A REZONING TO PLANT RESIDENTIAL AND A BASIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 6 5 0 2 ULTRA PIKE FOR IDENTIFIED AS PERSONAL MOBILE NUMBER P 7 0 0 4 0 0 4 0 0 0 3 ON THE MONTGOMERY COUNTY AUDITOR'S TEXT MAP AND ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND ZONING CASE. TWO ONE DASH THREE FOUR AT THE SIXTH READING. SO, BRIAN, I KNOW WE HAD HAD SOME COMMENTARY IN THE MEETINGS WHERE WE NEEDED TO KIND OF SPEND INFORMATION ON THIS COMING UP SOONER RATHER THAN LATER. I THINK BY THE END OF MARCH, TO KNOW WHETHER OR NOT WE WERE GOING TO HAVE TO BRING THIS, STOP THIS, BRING IT BACK OR INFORMATION THEY WERE MOVING FORWARD. SO ANY FURTHER COMMENTS BEFORE WE PASS THIS ON TO ANOTHER AREA? YES, SIR. WE'VE HAD AN OPPORTUNITY TO TALK WITH THE DEVELOPMENT TEAM THAT'S ASSOCIATED WITH THIS PROJECT, AND WE'VE ADVISED THEM THAT IF THERE IS NOT A CLEARLY DEFINED AND ARTICULATED AND DOCUMENTED PATH FOR COUNSEL, AS OF THE MEETING ON THE 28TH OF THIS MONTH, THAT STAFF WILL RECOMMEND COUNSEL TABLE THIS PARTICULAR MATTER INDEFINITELY. OKAY. AND THEY'RE FULLY AWARE OF THAT AND UNDERSTAND. YES, SIR. ALL RIGHT. ANY OBJECTIONS TO PASSING THIS ONTO A SEVENTH READING? OKAY. WE'LL SEE IT AGAIN. ON THE 28TH, WHERE DECISION WILL BE MADE. NEXT UP IS NUMBER [ A Motion To Reappoint Dennis Snider, Glenn Pottenger, Christopher Hall, And Ron Eifert (Special Liaison) To The Parks And Recreation Board For A Term Ending March 31, 2025.] 11, WHICH IS NEW BUSINESS UNDER CITY COUNCIL. MR. ROGERS. I AM 11 EIGHT ITEM 11, A MOTION TO REAPPOINT DENNIS SNYDER, GLENN POTTINGER, CHRISTOPHER HALL, AND RON EIFFERT AS A SPECIAL LIAISON TO THE PARKS AND RECREATION BOARD FOR A TERM ENDING MARCH 31ST, 2025. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS, UH, JUST THAT THE BACKGROUND CHECKS HAVE BEEN, UM, UH, CONDUCTED WHERE APPROPRIATE AND THAT THIS IS THE RECOMMENDATION OF CITY STAFF FOR THESE REAPPOINTMENTS. OKAY. NOW HAS YOUR APPOINTMENTS. THIS IS ALL JUST HEALING UNDER ONE MOTION. AND THAT WAS THE RECOMMENDATION. THE WORK SESSION. IS THERE A MOTION, GLEN, OUR MOTION TO REAPPOINT THESE FOUR GENTLEMEN TO THE PARKS AND REC. THANK YOU, SIR. IS THERE A SECOND DOC? I WILL SUCK UP EMOTION IN A SECOND. IS THERE ANY DISCUSSION DRUGS MR. OTTO? YES. MR. LYONS? YES. MR. WEBB, MS. BAKER. YES. MR. CAMPBELL, THIS IS MERGE AMBUSH AND CARRIES SIX TO ZERO. [ A Motion To Reappoint Jeff Schweinfurth To The Personnel Appeals Board For A Term Ending March 31, 2025.] AND NEXT IS ITEM 11, BEATS ADAM 11, BE A MOTION TO REAPPOINT JEFF SCHWEINFURTH TO THE PERSONNEL APPEALS BOARD FOR A TERM ENDING MARCH 31ST, 2025 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. THIS IS ALL THE SAME STAFF, STAFF RECOMMENDATION, SAME COMMENTS. AND, UM, HE WAS JUST APPOINTED LAST YEAR TO AN UNEXPIRED TERM. SO THIS IS A REAPPOINTMENT TO A FULL. OKAY, THANK YOU, SIR. APPRECIATE THE COMMENTS. AND IT WAS THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE WORK SESSIONS, OUR EMOTION MOTION TO REAPPOINT, MR. SCHWEINFURTH TO THE PERSONNEL APPEALABLE. EMOTIONAL A SECOND. A DISCUSSION ON THIS. OKAY. 10 MR. LYONS. YES. MR. WEBB. YES. MS. BAKER. YES. MR. CAMPBELL. YES. THIS THE SPURS MR. OTTO MOTION CARRIES SIX TO ZERO. THE NEXT [ A Motion To Appoint Jeffrey Held As An Ex Officio Member To The Military And Veterans Commission For A Term Ending December 31, 2024.] IS ITEM 11, C I HAD AN 11 C A MOTION TO APPOINT JEFFREY HELD AS AN EX-OFFICIO MEMBER TO THE MILITARY AND VETERANS COMMISSION FOR A TERM ENDING DECEMBER 31ST, 2024. UH, JOHNNY ADDITIONAL COMMENTS, MAYBE YOU MENTIONED AGAIN, THE PURPOSE OF THE EX-OFFICIO JUST OVERALL. UH, YEAH, THE EX-OFFICIO IS A NON-VOTING MEMBER OF THE COMMISSION. UH, MR. HELD IS A ACTIVE DUTY MEMBER OF THE MILITARY AND, UM, HAD APPLIED TO SERVE ON THIS COMMISSION, BUT DOES NOT MEET THE ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS AS A FULL MEMBER, UH, DUE TO THE FACT THAT, UM, HE DOES NOT HAVE RESIDENCY AS A MILITARY MEMBER IN, UH, HUBER HEIGHTS. AND, UM, SO, UH, HE, AFTER INTERVIEWING HIM THE CITY STAFF RECOMMENDATION AND THAT OF THE STAFF LIAISONS WAS, UM, THAT HE COULD BRING SOME BENEFIT TO THE COMMISSION, UH, BY HIS ACTIVE DUTY STATUS, AS WELL AS SOME OF THE SKILLS AND ABILITIES HE POSSESSES, UM, THAT WOULD BE, UM, HELPFUL TOWARDS FURTHERING THE GOALS OF THE COMMISSION. UM, SO THAT IS THE RECOMMENDATION TO MAKE THAT APPOINTMENT FOR THAT PURPOSE. YES. UM, I MOVED TO A POINT JEFFREY HELD AS AN OFFICIAL MEMBER. SECOND MOTION. A SECOND. ANY DISCUSSION MR. WEBB? YES. MS. BAKER. YES. MR. CABLE. YES. THIS IS BERGE. YES. MR. OTTO. YES. MR. LYONS MOTION CARRIES SIX TO ZERO. NEXT [ An Ordinance Approving The Editing And Inclusion Of Certain Ordinances And/Or Resolutions As Parts Of The Various Component Codes Of The City Code Of Huber Heights, Ohio; Providing For The Adoption And Publication Of New Matter In The Updated And Revised City Code As Supplement 9; And Repealing Ordinances And Resolutions In Conflict Therewith. (first reading)] IS ITEM 11, DEED ITEM 11 D AN ORDINANCE APPROVING THE EDITING AND INCLUSION OF CERTAIN ORDINANCES AND OR RESOLUTIONS AS PARTS OF THE VARIOUS COMPONENT CODES OF THE CITY CODE OF HUBER HEIGHTS, OHIO PROVIDING FOR THE ADOPTION OF PUBLICATION OF NEW MATTER. AND THE UPDATED AND REVISED CITY CODE IS SUPPLEMENTING NINE AND REPEATING REPEALING ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS AND CONFLICT THERE WITH, AT THE FIRST READING, UH, TONY ADDITIONAL COMM, UH, THIS IS, UH, STANDARD LEGISLATION. YOU SEE, AS A SUPPLEMENT, UH, IN THIS CASE, SUPPLEMENT NINE TO THE CITY CODE. IT COVERS, UH, ORDINANCES THAT WERE ADOPTED BY CITY COUNCIL FROM OCTOBER 1ST, 2021 THROUGH [01:15:01] DECEMBER 31ST, 2021. AS I MENTIONED AT THE WORK SESSION, UH, THIS IS A RATHER LARGE SUPPLEMENT BECAUSE OF ALL THE CHANGES THAT WERE, UH, INCORPORATED INTO THE CITY CODE IS A PART OF THE ORDINANCE REVIEW COMMISSION PROCESS FROM LAST YEAR. AND, UH, THE REQUIRED LEGAL NOTICE, UH, OF THIS, UH, UH, ADOPTION OF THE SUPPLEMENT HAS BEEN, UH, POSTED IN A NEWSPAPER OF GENERAL CIRCULATION. SO WE MET THAT CITY CHARTER REQUIREMENT. AND WE WOULD ASK FOR THIS TO GO TO A SECOND READING. UM, YES. WORKSITES RECOMMENDATION WAS PASSING TO ANOTHER READING. IS THERE ANY OBJECTION? OKAY. SEE THAT THE NEXT [ A Resolution Authorizing The City Manager To Enter Into An Agreement For The Provision Of Emergency Preparedness, Homeland Security And Emergency Management Services. (first reading)] MEETING, THE NEXT STEP IS ITEM 11 E UNDER ADMINISTRATION, UH, FOR MR. CITY MANAGER. SO TONY ITEM 11 ITEM 11 E A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT FOR THE PROVISION OF EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS HOMELAND SECURITY AND EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT SERVICES AT THE FIRST READING. BRIAN, UH, THANK YOU, SIR. THIS PARTICULAR RESOLUTION, UH, EFFECTIVELY ALLOWS THE CITY TO, UH, ENTER INTO A CONTRACT. UH, IT'S A UNIFORM CONTRACT WITH ALL JURISDICTIONS IN MONTGOMERY COUNTY FOR EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT SERVICES, WHICH ARE PROVIDED BY MONTGOMERY COUNTY TO US CURRENTLY. UH, ALL OF THE JURISDICTIONS AT PRESENT WITHIN MONTGOMERY COUNTY HAVE VARYING AND UNIQUE CONTRACTS FOR THE SAME SERVICE WITH MONTGOMERY COUNTY. THIS IS AN EFFORT TO BRING, UH, ALL OF THE MUNICIPALITIES UNDER THE SAME STRUCTURED CONTRACT FOR THE SAME SERVICE. WE'RE ALL RECEIVING. THANKS. ADOPTION WAS THE RECOMMENDATION. IS THERE A MOTION THROW UP? SO I MOVED TO A SECOND. MS. BURCH MOTION A SECOND. ANY DISCUSSION TODAY AS BAKER? YES. MR. CAMPBELL. YES. MRS. BERG. YES. MR. OTTO. YES. MR. LYONS. YES. MR. WEBB. YES. MOTION CARRIES SIX TO ZERO. NEXT [ A Resolution Establishing The 2022 Comprehensive Development Plan Steering Committee. (first reading)] UP IS ITEM 11 F ITEM 11 F UH, RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING THE 2022 COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT PLAN STEERING COMMITTEE AT THE FIRST READING. BRIAN. UH, THANK YOU, SIR. THIS RESOLUTION, UH, PROVIDES FOR THE FORMAT AND FRAMEWORK FOR THE STEERING COMMITTEE FOR THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IS UPDATED APPROXIMATELY EVERY 10 YEARS AND PROVIDES SOME GUIDANCE, UH, TO STAFF, TO COUNCIL, TO THE COMMUNITY, WITH RESPECT TO HOW WE THINK THE CITY MIGHT DEVELOP, OR SHOULD IT DEVELOP INTO FUTURE BASED ON CURRENT WANTS AND PAST TRENDS. THANK YOU. AND WORK SESSION RECOMMENDATION WAS TO ADOPT THIS EVENING. UM, UNDER SOME DISCUSSION, I WOULD JUST SAY THAT, UM, WE HAVE, UH, WE HAVE GOT THE NOTICE OUT SEEKING APPLICANTS TO JOIN THE STEERING COMMITTEE. WHAT IS THE DEADLINE? UH, THE END OF THIS WEEK? OKAY. DEADLINE IS THE END OF THIS WEEK. SO ANYBODY LISTENING, PAYING ATTENTION WHO WOULD LIKE TO BE ON THAT STEERING COMMITTEE, PLEASE FILL THE APPLICATION AND SUBMIT THAT TO MR. ROGERS. IS THERE A MOTION MR. CAMPBELL MOTION TO ADOPT OR A SECOND? MS. BAKER, SECOND OF MOTION. AND A SECOND. ANY OTHER DISCUSSION MR. ROGERS? MR. CAMPBELL? YES. MRS. YES. MR. OTTO. YES. MR. LYONS? YES. MR. WEBB. YES. MS. BAKER, YES. MOTION CARRIES SIX ZERO. [ An Ordinance Authorizing Advances and Transfers Between Various Funds Of The City Of Huber Heights, Ohio And Amending Ordinance No. 2021-O-2511 By Making Supplemental Appropriations For Expenses Of The City Of Huber Heights, Ohio For The Period Beginning January 1, 2022 And Ending December 31, 2022. (first reading)] NEXT UP IS 11 GENES ITEM 11 G AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING ADVANCES AND TRANSFERS BETWEEN VARIOUS FUNDS OF THE CITY OF YOUR BRIGHTS, OHIO AND AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 2021 DASH A DASH 2 5 1 1, BY MAKING SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATIONS FOR EXPENSES OF THE CITY OF HUBRIS OHIO FOR THE PERIOD BEGINNING JANUARY 1ST, 2022, AND ENDING DECEMBER 31ST, 2022 AT THE FIRST RING, RIGHT? UH, YES, SIR. UH, THIS RESOLUTION IS BROUGHT FORTH, UH, TO ADDRESS A COUPLE OF DIFFERENT ISSUES WITHIN THE BUDGET. UH, NOTABLY AMONG THEM ARE, UH, THE IMPROVEMENTS TO, UH, THE, UM, UH, TO SEE OUR DAYTON AS WELL AS SOME COST INCREASES ASSOCIATED WITH OUR STREET AND SIDEWALK PROGRAM AND ADDRESSING SOME ISSUES OUT AT THE, UH, THE WATER PLANT WITH RESPECT TO SOME PUMPS, UH, IN, WITH ONE OF THE WELLS. ADDITIONALLY, WE WOULD LIKE TO ASK COUNCIL THIS EVENING TO AMEND, UH, THIS PARTICULAR APPROPRIATION AND INCREASE IT BY $150,000. UH, THE REASON THAT WE WOULD ASK YOU TO DO THIS IS WE, UM, FOR THOSE OF YOU THAT MAY RECALL, THERE WAS AN ISSUE WITH WATER, UM, ON THE SURFACE OF CHIPPING DONE ON AND OFF OVER THE LAST SEVERAL MONTHS, UH, THERE WAS SOME EXPLORATORY WORK DONE ON NOT TOO LONG AGO TO GET IN AND TRY AND FIND OUT WHAT WAS GOING ON OVER THERE. UH, WELL, IF IT WAS WASN'T LEAKING BEFORE, AFTER ALL OF OUR JACK HAMMERING AND POUNDING AND EXPLORATORY WORK, IT'S LEAKING NOW. SO IT'S TIME TO COME OUT OF THE GROUND AND BE REPLACED. UH, IT'S AN OLDER SECTION OF PIPE, IT'S CONCRETE PIPE. UH, IT IS NO LONGER, UM, SERVICEABLE. AND SO IT NEEDS TO BE REPLACED. PART OF THE REASON THIS PROJECT WILL BE EXPENSIVE. IT'S GOING TO TAKE SEVERAL DAYS, UH, TO MAKE THE REPAIRS. SO WE NEED TO LAY A TEMPORARY LINE SO THAT, UH, RESIDENTS IN THE IMPACTED AREA COULD CONTINUE TO HAVE POTABLE SERVICEABLE WATER, UH, WHILE WE REPLACE. SO WE WOULD ASK THAT COUNCIL AMEND THIS PARTICULAR LEGISLATION, UH, TO ADD $150,000, UH, TO THE AMOUNT ALREADY REQUESTED SO WE CAN HAVE THE MONEY AVAILABLE FOR SUEZ ONCE THE REPAIRS COMPLETE. OKAY. SO LET'S PICK UP THE LEGISLATION. WE WOULD NEED [01:20:01] A MOTION TO AMEND, TO ADD THE HUNDRED $50,000 TO THE SUPPLEMENT. THEN IT WAS ASKED TO WAIVE THE SECOND. WOULD IT BE A MOTION TO WAIVE THE SECOND READING AND THEN FINALLY A MOTION FOR ADOPTION. SO IS THERE A MOTION TO AMEND MR. CAMPBELL? SO MOVE, IS THERE A SECOND, SECOND, WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND TO AMEND, TO ADD $150,000 TO SUPPLEMENT ANY DISCUSSION. TONY MRS. BERG. YES. MR. OTTO. YES. MR. LYONS. YES. MR. WEBB. YES. MS. BAKER. YES. MR. CAMPBELL. YES. MOTION TO AMEND TO CARRIES SIX TO ZERO. NEXT. IS THERE A MOTION TO WAIVE THE SECOND READING AS REQUESTED MR. WEB EMOTIONAL? WHY IS THERE A SECOND, SECOND BAKER. SECOND. ANY DISCUSSION ON THE MOTION TO WAIT, MR. ROGERS, MR. OTTO? YES. MR. LYONS. YES. MR. WEB. YES. MS. BAKER, MR. CAMPBELL. YES. MRS. BURCH AND MOTION WAVE CARRIES SIX TO ZERO AS WELL. AND NEXT, IS THERE A MOTION FOR ADOPTION MS. BERG TO ADOPT TO A SECOND BAKER SECONDS? ANY DISCUSSION MR. LYONS? YES. MR. WEBB? YES. MS. BAKER. YES. MR. CAMPBELL. YES. MRS. SPURS, MR. OTTO. YES. MOTION TO ADOPT ALSO CARRIES SIX ZERO, [ A Resolution Authorizing The City Manager To Increase The Not To Exceed Amount For The Maintenance And Supply Of Parts To Atlantic Emergency Solutions For Calendar Year 2022 And Waiving The Competitive Bidding Requirements. (first reading)] AND NEXT WE HAVE ITEM 11 H AND 11 H THE RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO INCREASE THE, NOT TO EXCEED AMOUNT FOR THE MINI MAINTENANCE AND SUPPLY OF PARTS TO ATLANTIC EMERGENCY SOLUTIONS FOR CALENDAR YEAR 2022 AND WAIVING THE COMPETITIVE BIDDING REQUIREMENTS AT THE FIRST STREET BRIGHTON COMMENTS. UH, YES. MR. MAYOR AS WAS REPORTED TO COUNCIL BY CHIEF KNISELY AT THE PREVIOUS WORK SESSION, THIS IS TO ALLOW FOR A SERVICE AND MAINTENANCE WORK ON THE, UH, THE LIGHTER TRUCK TO, UH, TO MAKE SURE THAT WE CAN GET THAT, UH, BACK IN BUSINESS AND KEEP IT IN BUSINESS AS LONG AS POSSIBLE. THANK YOU. RECOMMENDATION WAS ADOPTION. IS THERE A MOTION, MR. WEBB? SLOW-MO SECOND, SECOND, SECOND SECONDS. UH, IS THERE ANY DISCUSSION, MR. WHAT, JUST A BRIEF COMMENT TO THANK CHIEF KNISELY FOR THE PRESENTATION MADE IT VERY CLEAR WHY THIS IS NECESSARY. THANK YOU, MR. WEBB. YES. MS. BAKER. YES. MR. CAMPBELL. YES. MRS. BERG, MR. OTTO. YES. MR. LYONS. YES. MOTION CARRIES SIX ZERO. [ A Resolution Authorizing The City Manager To Increase The Not To Exceed Amount For SHI International For The Calendar Year 2022 And Waiving The Competitive Bidding Requirements. (first reading)] AND NEXT IS ITEM 11. I ITEM 11, I A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO INCREASE THE, NOT TO EXCEED AMOUNT FOR SHI INTERNATIONAL FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR 2022, AND WAIVING THE COMPETITIVE BIDDING REQUIREMENTS WITH THE FIRST DRAINING BRIAN. UH, THANK YOU, SIR. THIS IS THE, UH, EXPAND THE SPENDING LIMIT WITH SHI WHO PROVIDES A, IT SUPPORT TO, UH, MR. PEYTON AND HIS TEAM. UH, THE PRICE FOR OUR MICROSOFT LICENSES HAS INCREASED. UH, AND WE WERE NOT AWARE OF THAT AT THE TIME WE MADE THE BUDGET PER, UH, PREPARATION. SO, UH, WE WOULD, UH, ASK THE COUNCIL, ADOPT THIS LEGISLATION SO WE CAN PAY OUR BILLS AND CONTINUE TO, UH, 365. THAT WAS THE RECOMMENDATION. MR. CAMPBELL MOTION TO ADOPT THERE A SECOND. THIS IS BURJ MOTION. A SECOND. ANY DISCUSSION MS. BAKER? YES. MR. CAMPBELL. YES. MRS. BERG. YES. MR. OTTO. YES. MR. LYONS. YES. MR. WEBB. YES. MOTION CARRIES SIX ZERO. [ A Resolution Authorizing The City Manager To Increase The Not To Exceed Maintenance Contract Amount And Authorizing The City Manager To Enter Into A Contract Modification With Suez Water Environmental Services, Inc. (first reading)] AN X IS 11 JAKE ITEM, 11 J RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO INCREASE THE, NOT TO EXCEED MAINTENANCE CONTRACT AMOUNT AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO ENTER INTO A CONTRACT MODIFICATION WITH SUEZ WATER, ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES INCORPORATED AT THE FIRST STREET. UH, BRIAN. YES, SIR. THIS PARTICULAR LEGISLATION HAS BROUGHT FORWARD FOR COUNCIL'S CONSIDERATION TO ADDRESS THE WELLS, UH, EXCUSE ME, THE PUMPS. AND ONE OF THE WELLS, UH, OVER OFF OF RIP RAMP, THIS WAS AN ITEM THAT WAS BRIEF TO COUNCIL AT THE LAST WORK SESSION. UH, AND, UH, WE WOULD LIKE COUNCIL TO ADOPT THIS. SO WE HAVE THE RESOURCES TO REPAIR THE PUMPS AND MAKE SURE THAT THEY ARE AFFECTIONATE, THEY ARE FUNCTIONING PROPERLY. AND THAT WAS THE RECOMMENDATION TO ADOPTION. IS THERE A MOTION? IS THERE A SECOND, SECOND MOTION AND A SECOND. ANY DISCUSSION MR. CAMPBELL? YES. MRS. BERG, MR. OTTO. YES. MR. LYONS, MR. WEB MS. BAKER. YES. MOTION CARRIES SIX TO ZERO. [ A Resolution Authorizing The City Manager To Enter Into Contracts For The 2022 Sidewalk Program And The Concrete Portion Of The 2022 Street Program. (first reading)] AND LAST IS ITEM 11 CASE. A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO ENTER INTO CONTRACTS FOR THE 2022 SIDEWALK PROGRAM. AND THE CONCRETE PORTION OF THE 2022 STREET PROGRAM AT THE FIRST STREET. BRIAN COMMENTS. UH, YES, THERE, THIS RESOLUTION IS TO AUTHORIZE STAFF, TO AWARD THE CONCRETE WORK ASSOCIATED WITH OUR ANNUAL MAINTENANCE PROGRAM. AND WE WOULD ASK THE COUNCIL ADOPT THAT. SO WE MAY PROCEED WITH OUR WORK AS SOON AS THE WEATHER PERMITS. THAT WAS THE RECOMMENDATIONS OR EMOTION GLENN I'VE TURNED OFF. IS THERE A SECOND, MS. BIRCH SECOND MOTION AND A SECOND. ANY OTHER DISCUSSION MRS. BERG? YES. MR. OTTO. YES. MR. LYONS. YES. MR. WEBB, MS. BAKER, [01:25:02] MR. KIMBALL MOTION CARRIES SIX TO ZERO. NEXT UP [12. City Official Reports and Comments] IS THAT NUMBER 12 CITY OFFICIAL REPORTS AND COMMENTS? UH, THE ORDINANCE THAT WOULD HAVE THIS EVENING WOULD BE, UM, MR. ROGERS, UH, COUNCIL DIRECTIONS AND WORKING, UH, WITH ALL THE COUNCIL MEMBERS, AS YOU KNOW, ALONG WITH, UM, THE ABILITY TOWNSHIP TRUSTEES TO COME UP WITH A DATE FOR OUR PROPOSED MEETING. AND THE DATE THAT IS SCHEDULED IS APRIL 7TH, AT 6:00 PM HERE. AND HE WRITES AT THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS. SO THAT MEETING DATE HAS BEEN SET. SO ANYBODY WANTING TO ATTEND OR WATCH ONLINE WILL BE LIVE-STREAMED. WE KNOW THE DATE, APRIL 7TH AT 6:00 PM. UH, ANYONE HAVE ANYTHING ELSE? OKAY. UH, I HAVE NOT BEEN NOTIFIED ABOUT AN EXECUTIVE SESSION, SO THERE IS NO NEED FOR ONE THIS EVENING. AND AT 7 25, THIS MEETING ON THE 14TH IS HERE BY JUNE. * This transcript was created by voice-to-text technology. The transcript has not been edited for errors or omissions, it is for reference only and is not the official minutes of the meeting.