[00:00:03]
[ AGENDA PROPERTY MAINTENANCE REVIEW BOARD City Hall - Council Chambers 6131 Taylorsville Road July 22, 2021 6:30 P.M.]
ALL RIGHT.I'D LIKE TO CALL THE MEETING OF THE CITY.
HUBER HEIGHTS, PROPERTY MAINTENANCE REVIEW BOARD TO ORDER PLEASE.
MADAM SECRETARY, WOULD YOU CALL THE ROLL? ALL RIGHT, MR. AMBROSE, MS. BALLARD HERE.
MS. HESS, MR. ROBERTS, DEAR MS. ROSTER.
I'D LIKE TO HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE TONIGHT'S AGENDA.
ANYONE WANT TO MAKE THAT MOTION? PLEASE APPROVE THE AGENDA.
YOU MAY HAVE A SECOND, SECOND.
UM, WITHOUT OBJECTION, THEN THE AGENDA FOR TONIGHT'S MEETING HAS BEEN APPROVED.
SO IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RULES OF THE CITY OF HUBER HEIGHTS, I NEED TO SWEAR IN ANYBODY THAT'S WITNESSING AND THAT WOULD BE MR. MR. WARD.
DO YOU HEREBY SWEAR OR AFFIRM ON THE THREAT OF PERJURY TO TELL THE TRUTH, THE WHOLE TRUTH AND NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH SO HELP YOU GOD, I DO.
SO WE HAVE NO PENDING BUSINESS.
UM, SO WE'LL GO INTO NEW BUSINESS AND WE'LL START WITH PMR B CASE 21 DASH 13.
UM, THE PROPERTY OWNER, RUFUS RENTALS, LLC IS IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 13, 13 OF THE PROPERTY MAINTENANCE CODE AT PROPERTY LOCATED AT 44 25 PALLETS COURT.
THANK YOU FOR COMING OUT THIS EVENING.
UM, MR. CHAIRMAN, I HAVE SOME GOOD NEWS.
THE PROPERTY ON AT FOUR, FOUR TO FIVE PALLETS COURT HAS COME INTO COMPLIANCE SINCE THIS CASE WAS FILED.
SO STAFF WOULD RECOMMEND THE BOARD DISMISSED THIS CASE.
DO WE HAVE A MOTION TO DISMISS, PLEASE? REMEMBER WE DISMISS? WE HAVE A SECOND.
SO MOTION CARRIES TO DISMISS CASE PMR B CASE NUMBER 21 DAYS 13.
OH, MOVING RIGHT ALONG PMR B CASE 21 DASH 14.
UM, THE PROPERTY OWNER TARP, THOMAS MARCUS IS IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 13, 13 OF THE PROPERTY MAINTENANCE CODE.
THAT PROPERTY LOCATED AT 46 0 8
AND IS MR. CHAIRMAN THE PROPERTY AT 46 0 8? NORFOLK AVENUE HAS ALSO COME INTO COMPLIANCE.
SO STAFF WOULD REQUEST THE BOARD DISMISS THIS CASE.
UH, WE'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION THAT WE DISMISS CASE NUMBER 2114.
SO PMR B CASE 21 DAYS 14 HAS BEEN DISMISSED.
UH, PMR B CASE NUMBER 21 DASH 15, THE PROPERTY OWNER, FRED.
FRED LINDENMEYER IS IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 13, 13 OF THE PROPERTY AND MAINTENANCE CODE AT THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 57 73 GINS ROAD.
THE PROPERTY ABOVE IS IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 13, 13.04 OF THE SUDEVI UBERIZE CODE.
ALL OF THE NORMAL COURSE OF LETTERS HAVE BEEN SENT.
I'LL READ THE OVERVIEW, THE RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY AT 5 7 7 3 BOTKINS ROAD IS IN VIOLATION OF THE CITY'S PROPERTY MAINTENANCE CODE SECTION 13, 13.0 H FOUR, WHICH REQUIRES ALL END, SHALL BE PROPERLY MAINTAINED WITH LAWNS, HEDGES, BUSHES, TREES, AND OTHER VEGETATION TO BE TRIMMED AND KEPT FROM COMING.
OVERGROWN AND UNSIGHTLY WERE EXPOSED TO PUBLIC VIEW OR SUCH VEGETATION.
THEY CONSTITUTE A BLIGHTING INFLUENCE ON ADJOINING PROPERTY INSPECTION.
VERIFIES THE PROPERTY DOES NOT MEET THE STANDARDS SET FORTH IN THE CODE.
THEREFORE, THE PROPERTY IS IN VIOLATION.
THE PHOTOS IN YOUR PACKET ILLUSTRATE THE NEED TO BRING THE VEGETATION UNDER CONTROL.
CITY ZONING LETTERS HAVE BEEN RETURNED AS NOT FORWARDED OVER THE PAST TWO YEARS.
AND IT IS EVIDENT THAT THE PROPERTY IS UNINHABITED.
THE TAX RECORD SHOWS ALL TAXES ARE CURRENT AND HAVE HISTORICALLY BEEN PAID.
I BELIEVE IT'S REASONABLE TO ASSUME THAT ANY WORK, THIS BOARD ORDERS WILL BE PAID BY THE PROPERTY OWNER OR THROUGH THE ASSESSMENT PROCESS.
STAFF RECOMMENDS THE BOARD DECLARE THE PROPERTY OF
[00:05:01]
NUISANCE AND BOARD ORDER STAFF TO HAVE THE CITY CONTRACTOR TRIM ALL VEGETATION SUBSTANTIALLY TO ELIMINATE THE BLIGHTING INFLUENCE.I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.
YOU MAY HAVE ANYONE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS.
I MOVE INTO CLAIRE DEPARTMENT OF NUISANCE OR TO THE CITY CONTRACTOR TO SIGNIFICANTLY REDUCE THE VEGETATION TO, TO ALLEVIATE THE LIGHTING EFFLUENCE.
SO MOTION CARRIES FOR PMR B CASE 21 DAYS 15 X CASE PMR V CASE 21 DASH 16.
I'M THE OWNER MARRIED JUNE TURNER IS IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 13, 13 OF THE PROPERTY MAINTENANCE CODE, THAT PROPERTY LOCATED AT 69 0 5 MORLEY LANE.
MR. CHAIRMAN THE PROPERTY, AS STATED AS RECEIVED THE NORMAL COURSE OF LETTERS, IT IS ALSO IN VIOLATION OF THE SAME SECTION OF CODE AS THE PRIOR PROPERTY.
THE RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY AT 69 0 4, EXCUSE ME.
THAT MORLEY LANE IS IN VIOLATION OF THE CITY'S PROPERTY MAINTENANCE CODE, SECTION 13, 13 0 4 H FOUR, WHICH REQUIRES ALL AND SHALL BE PROPERLY MAINTAINED WITH LAWNS, HEDGES, BUSHES, TREES, AND OTHER VEGETATION TO BE TRIMMED AND KEPT FROM BECOMING OVERGROWN AND INSIGHTLY WERE EXPOSED TO POLLUTE VIEW OR SUCH VEGETATION MAY CONSTITUTE A BLIGHTING INFLUENCE ON ADJOINING PROPERTY INSPECTION.
VERIFIES THE PROPERTY DOES NOT MEET THE STANDARDS SET FORTH IN THE CODE.
THEREFORE, THE PROPERTY IS IN VIOLATION.
THE PHOTOS IN YOUR PACKET ILLUSTRATE THE NEED TO BRING THE VEGETATION UNDER CONTROL.
CITY ZONING LETTERS HAVE BEEN RETURNED AS NOT FORWARD OVER THE PAST YEAR AND ASSUMED THE PROPERTY IS UNINHABITED.
THE TAX RECORD SHOWS ALL TAXES ARE CURRENT AND HAVE HISTORICALLY BEEN PAID.
I BELIEVE IT'S REASONABLE TO ASSUME THAT ANY WORK, THIS BOARD ORDERS WILL BE PAID BY THE PROPERTY OWNER OR THROUGH THE ASSESSMENT PROCESS.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS THE BOARD DECLARED THEIR PROPERTY, A NUISANCE, THE BOARD ORDERS STAFF TO HAVE THE CITY CONTRACTOR TERM, ALL VEGETATION SUBSTANTIALLY TO ELIMINATE THE BLEEDING INFLUENCE ANY QUESTIONS FROM ANYONE.
IT LOOKS LIKE THE GRASS ISN'T QUITE AS OVERGROWN AS THE VEGETATION OF SOME OF THEM TO COME BY AND TAKE CARE OF THAT.
OR WE CUT THAT GRASS ON A REGULAR BASIS.
THAT'S PART OF OUR NORMAL GRASS CUTTING WHAT YOU MIGHT CALL REGULAR CUSTOMERS.
ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? ANYONE HAVE A MOTION PLEASE? WHEN WE DECLARED A PROPERTY, A NUISANCE IN ORDER THE STATE CONTRACTOR TO SIGNIFICANTLY REDUCE THE VEGETATION TO REMOVE THE BLIGHTING ANIMALS.
AND THE SECOND AND THE VOTE PLEASE? MS. BALLARD.
SO MOTION CARRIES FOR PMR B CASE 21 DASH 16.
NEXT CASE ON THE AGENDA IS PMR B CASE 21 DASH 17.
UM, PROPERTY OWNER BENNETT BROWN IS IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 13, 13 OF THE PROPERTY MAINTENANCE CODE AT PROPERTY LOCATED AT 87 0 1 ADAMS ROAD.
THE PROPERTY ON ADAMS ROAD VIOLATION OF SECTION 13, 13 0 5 C AS RECEIVED THE NORMAL COURSE OF LETTERS AS A PROPERTY.
THE PROPERTY IS IN VIOLATION OF THE CITY'S PROPERTY MAINTENANCE CODE, SECTION 13, 13 0 5 C, WHICH REQUIRES ALL YARDS COURTS OR LOTS SHALL BE KEPT FREE OF UNSIGHTLY MATERIALS, NOT APPROPRIATE TO THE AREA AND DEBRIS, WHICH MAY CAUSE A FIRE HAZARD, OR IT MAY ACT AS A BREEDING PLACE FOR BERMAN OR INSECTS.
ALL PREMISES SHALL BE REASONABLY, BE FREE FROM WASTEPAPER AND OTHER TRASH AND DEBRIS INSPECTION VERIFIES THE PROPERTY DOES NOT MEET THE STANDARDS, SET FORTH IN THE CODE.
THEREFORE THE PROPERTY IS IN VIOLATION AND THE PHOTOS IN YOUR PACKET ILLUSTRATE THAT ITEMS NEEDING REMOVAL, CITY ZONING LETTERS HAVE BEEN RETURNED OVER THE PAST YEAR.
AND IT IS ASSUMED THAT THE PROPERTY IS UNINHABITED.
THE TAX RECORD SHOWS TAXES ARE UNPAID.
AFTER JANUARY OF 2019 STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS THE BOARD DECLARED THE PROPERTY, A NUISANCE, THE BOARD ORDER STAFF TO HAVE THE CITY CONTACT AND REMOVE ALL JUNK ITEMS FROM THE PROPERTY.
[00:10:01]
ANY QUESTIONS? ANYONE I'M ASSUMING THAT THE PROPERTY'S EMPTY? YES.MA'AM AS FAR AS WE CAN DETERMINE.
AND I'M ASSUMING YOU'VE BEEN FROM THE BID OR THE PICTURES HERE THAT THERE IS NOT ANY WAY TO GET INTO THE HOUSE.
I MEAN, THERE'S NOT ANY OPEN WINDOWS OR BROKEN WINDOWS OR DOORS.
AND JUST IN SUMMARY, UH, WE KNOW THAT LAST YEAR THERE WAS A FAMILY MEMBER WHO LIVED IN THE HOUSE WHO WAS, UM, SOMEWHAT DISABLED AND HAVING CONVERSATION WITH HE AND A SISTER, UH, BECAUSE THERE WAS A LOT OF UNCUT GRASS, UM, SUBSEQUENT TO THAT, WE'VE HAD TO DO A TRASH ABATEMENT.
WE'VE HAD TO CUT GRASS AND NOW WE'RE DOING THIS.
SO WE KNOW THAT THE PROPERTY AND, AND NO COMMUNICATION FROM THE PROPERTY OWNER, SO WE KNOW IT'S FAKE.
ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? ANYONE GOT ONE MORE HERE THAT THE TAXES ARE UNPAID AFTER JANUARY, 2019? YES MA'AM.
SO THAT MEANS THAT THE CITY IS 89.
MY DEPARTMENT HAS A SUBSTANTIAL BUDGET JUST FOR THESE THINGS TO BE TAKEN CARE OF.
WHAT WE DO IS WHEN THE CONTRACTOR BILLS ME, I DO AN ASSESSMENT LETTER FOR HIS COSTS.
I HAD $250 TO THAT AS AN ADMINISTRATIVE FEE.
AND THAT LETTER IS SENT TO THE FINANCE DEPARTMENT.
THEY BILL THE PROPERTY OWNERS.
SO WE DON'T AUTOMATICALLY ASSESS IT TO THE TAXES THAT ASSESSMENT'S ONLY DONE.
I BELIEVE A COUPLE OF TIMES A YEAR THERE HAS TO BE LEGISLATION WRITTEN.
SO THAT'S A VERY DELIBERATE PROCESS.
UM, ALTHOUGH THEY'RE GIVEN TWO WEEKS BY DEFAULT TO ANY INVOICE, WE'RE HAPPY TO TAKE THEIR MONEY ANYTIME THEY SEND IT TO US.
SO IF THEY GET IT TO US BEFORE IT'S POSTED, THEN IT'S TAKEN CARE OF.
ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? ANYONE HAVE A MOTION PLEASE? PROPERTY AND NUISANCE AND, OR THE CITY CONTRACTOR THAT HAVE THE JUNK ITEMS REMOVED.
SO MOTION CARRIES FOR PMR B CASE 21 DAY 17.
NEXT CASE BEING PMR B CASE 21 DASH 18, THE PROPERTY OWNER, TIMOTHY MASON IS IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 13, 13 OF THE PROPERTY MAINTENANCE CODE, THAT PROPERTY LOCATED AT 57 57 BODKINS ROAD.
WELL, MR. CHAIRMAN, THIS PROPERTY HAS COME INTO COMPLIANCE SINCE THE CASE WAS FILED.
SO STAFF WOULD RECOMMEND DISMISSAL OF THE CASE, AT LEAST LIKE NEIGHBORS.
SO THIS ONE'S BECOME COMPLIANT.
AND THEN WHENEVER YOU'RE READY.
MOTION CARRIES AND PMR B CASE 21 DAYS 19.
UM, THE PROPERTY OWNER, TIMOTHY MASON IS IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 13, 13 OF THE PROPERTY MAINTENANCE CODE AT PROPERTY LOCATED AT 4,690 LONGFELLOW ROAD OR AVENUE.
MR. CHAIRMAN, THE NORMAL COURSE OF LETTERS HAVE BEEN SENT.
UH, THIS IS THE SAME OWNER AS THE CASE OF A JUSTICE MIST.
UH, THIS IS ANOTHER ONE OF HIS PROPERTIES IN THE CITY OR THE RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY AT 46 90 LONGFELLOW AVENUE IS IN VIOLATION OF THE CITY'S PROPERTY MAINTENANCE CODE, SECTION 13, 13 0 5 C, WHICH REQUIRES ALL YARDS COURTS OR LOTS B SHALL BE KEPT FREE OF UNSIGHTLY MATERIALS, NOT APPROPRIATE TO THE AREA AND DEBRIS, WHICH MAY CAUSE A FIRE HAZARD OR MAY ACT AS A BREEDING PLACE FOR BOURBON OR INSECTS.
ALL PREMISES SHALL BE REASONABLY FREE FROM WASTING PAPER AND OTHER TRASH AND DEBRIS.
ALSO SECTION 13, 13 0 4 H SIX REQUIRES ANY ITEMS USED OR STORED OUTSIDE OF AN ENCLOSED BUILDING OR STRUCTURE SHALL BE LIMITED TO ITEMS MANUFACTURED FOR INTENDED FOR, OR CUSTOMARILY USED IN AN OUTDOOR ENVIRONMENT.
[00:15:01]
MANUFACTURED FOR INTENDED FOR, OR CUSTOMARILY STORED OR USED INDOORS MAY BE PLACED OR STORED OUTSIDE INSPECTION VERIFIES THE PROPERTY DOES NOT MEET THE STANDARDS SET FORTH IN THE CODE.THEREFORE, THE PROPERTY IS IN VIOLATION.
THE PHOTO IN YOUR PACKET ILLUSTRATES THIS NUMEROUS ITEMS, NEEDING REMOVAL, CITY ZONING LETTERS HAVE NOT BEEN RETURNED YET.
THE PROPERTY REMAINS IN VIOLATION.
AND, UH, AND ONE, UH, ADDENDUM TO THAT, THE CERTIFIED LETTER THAT WAS SENT TO THE PROPERTY OWNER, NOTIFYING THAT THIS HEARING WAS REFUSED TO BE PICKED UP AT THE POST OFFICE BY THE OWNER.
UM, THE PROPERTY OWNER IS NOT COMMUNICATED WITH THE CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER REVIVED REGARDING THIS PROPERTY.
UM, TAX RECORDS SHOW, ALL TAXES ARE CURRENT AND HAVE HISTORICALLY BEEN PAID.
I BELIEVE IT IS REASONABLE TO ASSUME THAT ANY WORK, THIS BOARD ORDERS WILL BE PAID BY THE PROPERTY OWNER THROUGH THE ASSESSMENT PROCESS.
I'LL ADD TO THIS A LITTLE BIT OF AN EDITORIAL, AND IT'S NOT IN MY STAFF REPORT THAT THE GENTLEMAN WHO OWNS THIS PROPERTY OWNS SEVERAL PROPERTIES IN THE CITY OF HEBREW HEIGHTS.
THIS PROPERTY OUTSIDE AND INSIDE IS A STORAGE HOUSE FOR HIS ITEMS. HE USES TO IMPROVE OTHER PROPERTIES OR REPOSITORY.
OBVIOUSLY FOR ONCE HE TAKES OUT HIS PROPERTY HAS BEEN LIKE THIS FOR A VERY LONG TIME.
WE'VE RECEIVED A COMPLAINT FROM SOMEONE WHO SAID, YES, I KNOW WHO THIS GUY IS.
AND THE BACKYARD IS FULL OF WATER HEATERS AND FURNACES.
THAT'S WHAT INITIATED THIS INVESTIGATION.
UM, SO THE SHEER AMOUNT OF ITEMS THAT WILL NEED TO BE REMOVED, THIS WILL TAKE SOME TIME TO DO, BUT, UM, CONTRACTOR IS CAPABLE OF DOING IT.
IF NOT, HE WILL HIRE ENOUGH PEOPLE TO DO IT.
AND, UH, ALL OF THOSE ITEMS WILL BE REMOVED.
AND OF COURSE WE'LL BE INVOICED, WE'LL INVOICE THE PROPERTY OWNER, BUT THIS WILL BE A PROCESS.
BUT, UM, STAFF WOULD LIKE TO THE BOARD TO DECLARE THE PROPERTY AND NUISANCE AND ORDER STAFF TO HAVE THE CITY CONTRACT, TO REMOVE ALL JUNK AND APPROPRIATELY STORED ITEMS FROM THE PROPERTY.
AND I APOLOGIZE, I HAD THIS PICTURE UP OF THE LAST PROPERTY BECAUSE THERE WAS NO PICTURE FOR THE LAST PROPERTY BECAUSE IT WAS COMPLIANT.
SO THIS PICTURE DOES GO WITH 46 90 LONG FELLOW.
SEEMS LIKE A SCRAPPER WOULD HAVE FUN COMING BY THIS HOUSE.
YOU KNOW, I'M NOT SURE WHY THE OWNER HAS FAILED TO COMMUNICATE WITH US ON THIS, IN THIS PARTICULAR SITUATION.
I'M NOT SURPRISED HAVING DEALT WITH PROPERTY OWNERS IN THE PAST THAT CHOOSE NOT TO, TO, TO HANDLE IT.
ANYONE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS? I HAVE A QUESTION.
MR. MILLER, DO YOU KNOW, HISTORICALLY, HAS THIS PROPERTY EVER HAD TO HAD AN ORDER TO CLEAN UP PREVIOUS? IT HAS NOT TO MY KNOWLEDGE.
SO THIS IS THE FIRST I, TO MY KNOWLEDGE.
UM, BUT THEN I WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN INVOLVED WITH THIS FOUR YEARS AGO.
IT LOOKS LIKE SOME OF THESE ITEMS LIKE WATER HEATERS, ONE ON A BIKE CARRY SOME VALUE, AS ON, DO WE EXPECT SOME KIND OF FIGHT FROM THE PROPERTY OWNER IN REGARDS TO THE VALUE, WHAT TO EXPECT? I MEAN, SOME OF THAT ONE ROW IN FRONT LOOKS TO ME LIKE IT'S UNUSED.
WE GET EITHER BRING THIS TO THE BOARD OR WE CAN FILE THIS GENTLEMEN IN COURT.
UM, WE CHOSE TO BRING IT TO THE BOARD.
OF COURSE IT FELT THAT WAS A PROPER THING TO DO.
CAUSE IT FELL WITHIN THE PROPERTY MAINTENANCE CODE.
UM, SINCE WE'VE HAD NO COMMUNICATION FROM HIM IN ANY, IN ANY WAY REGARDING THIS PROPERTY, I DON'T ANTICIPATE ANYTHING.
I'M SURPRISED IT HAS NOT BEEN BROUGHT INTO ORDER.
UM, BECAUSE THERE MAY BE TOOLS THERE THAT ARE OF SOME VALUE TO HIM.
SO I'M HOPING THAT PERHAPS HE'S VIEWING THIS OR WE'LL SEE THE VIDEO OF THIS HEARING AND CHOOSE TO COME INTO COMPLIANCE VOLUNTARILY BEFORE MY CONTRACTOR ARRIVES ON SITE TO BEGIN THE WORK.
I KNOW WE'VE KIND OF BEEN THROUGH THIS BEFORE A LITTLE BIT ON OTHER CASES, DO YOU NOTIFY THEM THAT THIS IS GOING TO TAKE PLACE ONCE WHATEVER THE BOARD DECIDES, THE LETTERS CLEARLY STATE THAT THIS IS GOING TO BE, THIS
[00:20:01]
IS WHAT'S GOING TO HAPPEN.AND THE LETTER AND JERRY, THE LETTER WE SEND THEM IS VERY SPECIFIC.
UH, HE CHOSE NOT TO PICK THE LETTER UP.
UM, BUT IT, WE HAD SENT HIM THE LETTER.
UH, THIS GENTLEMAN HAS RECEIVED LETTERS FROM US OVER THE YEARS, LIKE SAY, OKAY.
AND SOMETIMES JUICES HAVE BEEN, COME UP, BECOME COMPLIANT.
UM, YOU KNOW, DURING THE COVID WE KNEW OF THIS, BUT WE ARE GIVING HIM THE SAME CONSIDERATION.
WE DID THE REST OF OUR CITIZENS FOR 15 MONTHS.
WE WERE VERY, UM, WE WERE NOT AGGRESSIVE ON THIS TYPE OF THING.
IT'S TIME TO GO BACK TO NORMAL.
SO MY SUPERVISOR, MY, MY, UM, INSPECTOR HAS BEEN WORKING WITH HIM FOR SOME TIME AND JUST NO, NO COMPLIANCE.
IF WE START THE PROCESS AND THE CITY CONTRACTORS DO BEGIN WORKING ON CLEARING THINGS UP, THE OWNER DECIDES THAT HE WANTS TO COMPLETE IT IS DOES HE HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO COME BACK IN AND FINISH IT? OF COURSE IT SAYS PROPERTY, UM, THAT THE PROPER, THE CONTRACTOR WILL HAVE TO DECIDE HOW HE'S GOING TO SCHEDULE WHAT TO DO HERE.
UM, AND I'LL PROBABLY MEET HIM THERE AND SAY, WE'RE TAKING THIS.
WATER HEATERS FALL UNDER NOT INTENDED FOR OUTSIDE USE.
AND THAT'S WHY I HAD THAT SECTION OF CODE WRITTEN ABOUT A YEAR AGO TO COVER THIS VERY TYPE OF THING, FURNITURE, APPLIANCES THAT PEOPLE TEND TO STORE OUTSIDE SOMETIMES FOR LONG PERIODS OF TIME.
BUT THIS IS BY FAR AN ANOMALY BECAUSE OF THE CONDITION OF SOME OF THESE OBJECTS.
AS MR. ROBERTS POINTED OUT, THOSE WATER HEATERS HAVE NEVER BEEN USED.
UM, HOW LONG DO WE LET THIS GO ON? RIGHT? BECAUSE THIS PRIVACY FENCE DOES NOT EXTEND ALL THE WAY AROUND THIS HOUSE.
THE REPORT I RECEIVED WAS FROM SOMEONE IN PARK, IN THE PARK CALL HIM, DO YOU KNOW, SINCE THIS, SINCE SOME OF THESE ITEMS DO LOOK LIKE THEY'RE NEW, HAVE THEY BEEN TRANSITIONAL? HAVE THEY HAVE SOME OF THE ITEMS GONE OUT AND OTHER ITEMS COME IN? NO IDEA.
CAN I ASK THE QUESTION? IF THE, IF WE START REMOVING THE, LIKE THE WATER HEATERS AND THEY DO LOOK NEW, SOME OF THAT STEP DANCE.
NOW, IF THE PROPERTY OWNERS SHOULD COME AND SAY, WHERE DID YOU TAKE MY PROPERTY? WELL, WE TELL HIM WHERE IT SAT SO HE CAN GO AND GET IT, OR HE'S JUST, WELL, WE'RE NOT STORING IT.
MY PROP, MY, UM, CONTRACTOR WILL DISPOSE OF IT AT THE COUNTY TRANSFER AND HAUL PLANT IN THE MORAINE.
I'M TRULY HOPING THAT THE OWNER STORES THESE INSIDE A BUILDING, WHETHER IT'S THE DETACHED GARAGE OR THE HOUSE, BECAUSE THIS IS NOT SOMETHING THE CITY'S LOOKING FORWARD TO HAVING TO DO, BUT WE HAVE A RESPONSIBILITY TO THE REST OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND TO DO WHAT THIS BOARD DIRECTS US TO DO.
SO I'M HOPEFUL THAT WE'LL SEE AN IMPROVEMENT BETWEEN NOW AND THEN.
SO, SO WHEN WERE YOUR CONTRACTORS GO OUT? UH, WELL, WE HAVE A CONTRACT.
UM, I'LL PROBABLY WAIT TIL AFTER MOWING SEASON IS OVER BECAUSE HE DOES ALL OF OUR MOWING AND TRASH ABATEMENTS.
THIS IS GOING TO BE VERY TIME CONSUMING AND HE, AND I WILL NEED TO DISCUSS WHAT WE DO WITH WHAT, BUT WE CAN'T REALLY PICK AND CHOOSE IF IT'S NOT MADE TO BE STORED OUTSIDE.
CLEARLY, ACCORDING TO THE CODE SAYS IT CANNOT BE REGARDLESS OF THE CONDITION.
ANYONE HAVE A MOTION PLEASE? IS THAT A PROPERTY? A NUISANCE IN ORDER TO JUNK ITEMS OUT THE OUTSIDE STORE ITEMS REMOVED.
SO THE MOTION CARRIES 4:00 PM RB CASE 21 DASH 19.
UM, ACCORDING TO THE AGENDA, WE HAVE NO OTHER ADDITIONAL BUSINESS.
AND THEN, UM, WITHOUT OBJECTION, UH, IF THERE WAS NO OBJECTION TO THE MINUTES OF MAY 13TH, 2021, I WILL DECLARE THEM APPROVED AND THEY ARE SO APPROVED.
UM, NOW IT WOULD TAKE AN ENTERTAINMENT, MOTION TO ADJOURN.