[00:00:02]
[ AGENDA PROPERTY MAINTENANCE REVIEW BOARD City Hall - Council Chambers 6131 Taylorsville Road July 27, 2023 6:30 P.M.]
THE MEETING OF THE CITY OF HUBER HEIGHTS, PROPERTY MAINTENANCE REVIEW BOARD AND ORDER PLEASE, MA'AM.SECRETARY, WILL YOU CALL THE ROLL? ALL RIGHT.
IF THERE IS, I NEED TO ASK FOR A MOTION TO APPROVE THE AGENDA.
CAN I GET A ME MOTION TO APPROVE TONIGHT'S AGENDA? I MAY WE APPROVE THE AGENDA AND A SECOND PLEASE.
TAKE YOUR PROTOCOL, WHICHEVER ONE.
YOU UP THERE, JOHN AND SHEILA.
AND WE DON'T HAVE TO TAKE A LOOK FOR THAT.
THE AGENDA FOR THE TONIGHT'S MEETING IS APPROVED.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RULES, THE CODE OF CITY HUBER HEIGHTS, ANYONE WHO MAY WISH TO SPEAK OR GIVE TESTIMONY REGARDING THE ITEMS ON THE AGENDA MEETING, I NEED TO SWEAR THEM IN.
UM, MR. ARD, WOULD YOU RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND AND, UH, DO YOU HEREBY SWEAR OR AFFIRM ON THE THREAT OF PERJURY TO TELL THE TRUTH, THE WHOLE TRUTH, AND NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH, SO HELP YOU GOD? I DO.
ALRIGHT, SO PENDING BUSINESS, WE HAVE NONE.
UM, AND WHERE'S MY AGENDA HERE? IT'S, AND STARTING OUT WITH, UH, THE NEW BUSINESS, WE HAVE P M R B CASE 23 DASH 10.
THE PROPERTY OWNER, UH, I'M GOING TO SAY G KEYS.
L L C IS IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 1313 0.04 H SIX OF THE PROPERTY MAINTENANCE CODE AT PROPERTY LOCATED AT 54 40 THROUGH 54 44 BELL FOUNTAIN ROAD.
THANK YOU MR. CHAIRMAN, EVERYONE, THANK YOU FOR BEING HERE THIS EVENING.
CONGRATULATIONS TO THIS BOARD.
THEY, THEIR PRESENTATION BY THEIR CHAIRMAN WAS WELL RECEIVED BY COUNCIL.
AND, UH, THEY REALLY EXPRESSED THEIR APPRECIATION FOR WHAT THE BOARD DOES AND, UM, WE APPRECIATE IT AS WELL.
HAVING SAID THAT, REGARDING THE PROPERTY ON DEL FOUNTAIN ROAD, UH, IT IS A MULTI-FAMILY PROPERTY.
UH, WE HAVE ISSUED THE NORMAL COURSE OF LETTERS OVER THE MONTH OF MAY.
THIS SEEMS SUCH A MINOR VIOLATION, BUT COMPLIANCE IS COMPLIANCE.
THE RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY AT 54 40 THROUGH 44 BERAM ROAD IS IN VIOLATION OF A SECTION 13 13 0 4 H SIX REGARDING REMOVAL OF JUNK, DISCARDED METAL REMAINS AGAINST THE SIDE OF THE BUILDING.
SECTION 13 13 0 4 H SIX B STATES, ALL PERMISSIBLE ITEMS STORED OUTSIDE MUST BE IN GOOD CONDITION AND USABLE AS INTENDED BY THE MANUFACTURER.
NO SUCH ITEMS THAT ARE BROKEN, DILAPIDATED, OR DISCARDED SHALL BE STORED OUTSIDE.
INSPECTION, VERIFIES THE PROPERTY DOES NOT MEET THE STANDARDS SET FORTH IN THE CODE, THEREFORE, THE PROPERTY IS IN VIOLATION.
YOUR ATTACHED CASE VIEW REVIEWS, EXCUSE ME, YOUR ATTACHED CASE REVIEW ILLUSTRATES THE VIOLATION PROCESS AND NON-COMPLIANCE OF THE PROPERTY.
CITY ZONING LETTERS MAILED TO THE OWNER OF RECORD HAVE NOT BEEN RETURNED.
THERE HAS BEEN NO COMMUNICATION FROM THE OWNER TO CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICE.
THE TAX RECORD SHOWS PROPERTY TAXES ARE TYPICALLY PAID ANY WORK.
THIS BOARD ORDERS WILL BE INVOICED TO THE PROPERTY AND THE OWNER'S NAME.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS THE BOARD DECLARE THE PROPERTY A NUISANCE AND THE BOARD ORDERS STAFF TO HAVE THE CITY CONTRACTOR ABATE THE PROPERTY.
QUESTIONS? ANYONE? WILL THIS PROPERTY, WILL THE OWNER HAVING A WYOMING ADDRESS THIS BEING A MULTI UNIT? I'M ASSUMING WHOEVER THE OWNERS OF THE L C R ARE NOT RE RESIDING IN THIS PROPERTY.
IS ANYONE RESIDING IN IT? OH YEAH.
THIS IS ONE OF THOSE, UH, FIRMS THAT OWNS A LOT OF RENTAL PROPERTIES THROUGHOUT THE COUNTRY.
THEY PROBABLY BUY THEM ONLINE, SO THEY'RE NON-COMPLIANT AND THEY'RE SIMPLY, IN MY OPINION, JUST IGNORING OUR LETTERS AND NOT WORRIED ABOUT IT.
IT'S PROBABLY IN THEIR FRAME OF MIND BETTER FOR THEM TO LET US TAKE CARE OF IT THAN TO HIRE SOMEBODY TO DO IT THEMSELVES.
YOU SEE, YOU'LL RATHER MINOR INFRACTION, BUT NONETHELESS DOES KYLE HARD TELL FROM THE PICTURE? BUT WHAT EXACTLY IS THE
ANYONE ELSE HAVE A MOTION PLEASE? I'LL MAKE A MOTION THAT WE DECLARE THE PROPERTY NUISANCE AND HAVE IT ABATED.
[00:05:03]
HAVE A VOTE PLEASE.MOTION CARRIES FOR P M R B CASE 23 DASH 10.
SECOND CASE ON THIS EVENING'S AGENDA IS P M R B CASE 23 DASH 11.
UH, THE PROPERTY OWNER, CLARK BLAND AND HOME L T D, IS IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 1313 0.04 H ONE OF THE PROPERTY MAINTENANCE CODE AND PROPERTY LOCATED AT 75 0 7 DAMASCUS DRIVE.
UH, THIS IS A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY.
UH, THEY HAVE RECEIVED THE NORMAL COURSE OF LETTERS OVER THE COURSE OF MAY.
THE RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY IS IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 13 13 0 4 H ONE REGARDING EXTERIOR PROPERTY MAINTENANCE AND 13 13 0 5 C.
THE PROPERTY WAS CITED FOR DETACHED GUTTERS AND SOFFIT AS WELL AS TREE DEBRIS.
ALTHOUGH SOFFITS HAVE BEEN REPAIRED, THE DETACHED GUTTER REMAINS AS WELL AS THE DEBRIS.
SECTION 13 13 0 4 H ONE STATES, THE EXTERIOR OF A STRUCTURE SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN GOOD REPAIR, STRUCTURALLY SOUND AND SANITARY SO AS NOT TO POSE A THREAT TO THE PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY, OR WELFARE.
THE OWNER SHALL KEEP THE EXTERIOR OF ALL PREMISES AND EVERY STRUCTURE THERE'RE ON INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO.
WALLS, ROOFS, CORNICES, CHIMNEYS, DRAINS, TOWERS, PORCHES, LANDSCAPES, LANDINGS, FIRE ESCAPES, STAIRS, WINDOWS, DOORS, AWNINGS AND MARQUEES AND GOOD REPAIR.
SECTION 13, 13 0 5 STATES ALL YARDS, QUARTS OR LOTS SHALL BE KEPT FREE OF UNSIGHTLY MATERIALS NOT APPROPRIATE TO THE AREA AND DEBRIS WHICH MAY CAUSE A FIRE HAZARD AND MAY ACT AS A BREEDING PLACE FOR BOURBON AND INSECTS.
ALL PREMISES SHALL BE REASONABLY FREE FROM WASTE PAPER AND TRASH AND DEBRIS INSPECTION VERIFIES THE PROPERTIES DID NOT MEET THE STANDARD SET FORTH IN THE CODE, THEREFORE THE PROPERTY'S IN VIOLATION.
YOUR ATTACHED CASE REVEAL ILLUSTRATES THE VIOLATION PROCESS AND NON-COMPLIANCE OF THE PROPERTY.
CITY'S ZONING LETTERS MAILED TO THE OWNER OF RECORD HAVE NOT BEEN RETURNED.
THERE HAS BEEN NO COMMUNICATION FROM THE PROPERTY OWNER TO THE CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICE.
THE TAX RECORD SHOWS PROPERTY TAXES ARE TYPICALLY PAID.
ANY WORK AS BOARD ORDERS WOULD BE INVOICED TO THE PROPERTY IN THE OWNER'S NAME.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS THE BOARD DECLARE THE PROPERTY A NUISANCE.
THE BOARD ORDERS STAFF TO HAVE THE CITY CONTRACTOR ABATE THE PROPERTY.
ANY QUESTIONS? YEAH, I'VE GOT ONE.
DOES ANYONE LIVE IN THE PROPERTY? TO OUR KNOWLEDGE, YES THEY DO.
ONCE THE CITY GETS THE CONTRACT, HOW LONG DOES IT TAKE THEM TO GET THE WORK? WELL, DEPENDS ON WHAT THE CONTRACTOR WE USE.
IT JUST DEPENDS ON WHAT HIS SCHEDULE IS.
'CAUSE HE DOES ALL OF OUR MOWING, SO HE HAS TO PUT ON HIS SCHEDULE.
UM, BUT, AND THIS CONTRACTOR, UM, THIS WILL BE SOME OF THE FIRST STRUCTURAL REPAIRS HE HAS TO DO.
NOW, HE'S BEEN DOING THIS FOR A VERY LONG TIME.
HE'S VERY CAPABLE, BUT, UH, I WOULD EXPECT IT TO BE DONE WITHIN 30 DAYS OF HIM BEING NOTIFIED.
IT'S HARD TO FIND A CONTRACTOR THAT CAN WORK THAT QUICKLY.
SO THIS IS A PART-TIME JOB FOR, THIS IS HIS.
I WOULD SAY THIS IS HIS VOCATION AFTER HIS OTHER JOB.
IT, IT'S NOT PART-TIME THIS TIME OF YEAR, I CAN TELL YOU THAT.
SO YOU SAID THE, YOU, THE LIGHT SOFFIT WERE REPAIRED AT SOME POINT.
DO WE KNOW WHEN THAT OCCURRED? NO, I DON'T.
SOMETIME DURING THE VIOLATION PROCESS OF THAT OCCURRED THROUGHOUT THE MONTH OF MAY AND I THINK IT WAS PROBABLY JUST A MATTER OF PUTTING SOMETHING BACK IN PLACE.
AND HONESTLY WE HAVE HISTORY WITH THIS PROPERTY OWNER.
I WAS SURPRISED, I THOUGHT THIS PROPERTY OWNER HAD SOLD ALL OF HER PROPERTIES.
THIS WAS A FAMILY INTEREST AND, UH, I WAS SURPRISED TO IN CHECKING THE, THE RECORDS TO FIND THAT, THAT IN FACT SHE STILL HAS OWNERSHIP OF THE PROPERTY.
'CAUSE I'VE DEALT WITH HER SEVERAL TIMES OVER THE LAST 15 YEARS AND I UNDERSTOOD HER TO TELL ME A FEW YEARS AGO SHE WAS DISPOSING OF ALL OF THEM.
SO THIS IS EVIDENTLY ONE THAT THEY'VE HELD ON TO.
ALRIGHT, ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? ANYONE ENTERTAIN A MOTION PLEASE? I MOVE THAT THE BOARD, UM, DECLARE
[00:10:01]
THE PROPERTY A NUISANCE AND THE CITY ABATE THE PROPERTY.MOTION CARRIES FOR P M R B CASE 23 DASH 11.
MOVING ON P M R B CASE 23 DASH 12.
THE PROPERTY OWNER, JOHN VIGAS, IS IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 1313 0.04 H ONE OF THE PROPERTY MAINTENANCE CODE, A PROPERTY LOCATED AT 62 58 TENDERS ROAD.
UH, MR. CHAIRMAN, I'M AFRAID TO SAY I DON'T HAVE A STAFF REPORT IN MY FOLDER FOR THIS PROPERTY.
SO IF WE CAN SET THIS INTO THE BACK UNTIL I HAVE A CHANCE TO GET THE STAFF REPORT TO READ YOU.
ALTHOUGH I DO KNOW WHAT THE ISSUE IS, SO I'M, I'M WILLING TO GO THAT ROUTE.
YOU HAVE THE STAFF REPORT, YOU MEAN ON THE, ON THE MONITOR.
DO THAT, ROLL THAT BEAM FOOTAGE.
CAN YOU READ IT IF I MAY? MM-HMM.
I JUST HAVE TO ANY UP SPEAK LOUD ENOUGH THAT WE CAN GET YOU RECORDED.
JERRY, DO YOU WANT ME TO GO PRINT ONE? UH, DO YOU WANT ME TO GO PRINT ONE? YOU'LL BE ABLE TO HEAR ME NOW.
SO THE RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY IS 62 58.
TAYLORSVILLE ROAD IS IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 13 13 0 4 H ONE REGARDING EXTERIOR PROPERTY MAINTENANCE.
THE PROPERTY HAS TARPS IN PLACE FOR WHAT IS DESCRIBED BY THE RESIDENCE AS A LEAKING ROOF.
THE TARPS ARE NOT INTACT AND ARE DETERIORATED.
SECTION 13 13 0 4 H ONE STATES, THE EXTERIOR OF A PROPERTY SHALL BE MAINTAINED A GOOD REPAIR STRUCTURALLY SOUND AND SANITARY.
SO IT'S NOT POSE A THREAT TO THE PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY OR WELFARE.
THE OWNER SHOULD KEEP THE EXTERIOR OF ALL PROPERTIES IN EVERY STRUCTURE THERE ON, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO WALLS AND ROOFS, ET CETERA.
VERIFIES THAT THE PROPERTY DOES NOT MEET THE STANDARDS SET FORTH IN THE CODE, THEREFORE, THE PROPERTY'S IN VIOLATION.
YOUR ATTACHED CASE REVIEW ILLUSTRATES THE VIOLATION PROCESS AND NON-COMPLIANCE OF THE PROPERTY.
CITY ZONING LETTERS MAILED TO THE OWNER OF RECORD HAVE NOT BEEN RETURNED.
DESPITE THE OFFICER'S PATIENCE WITH THE RESIDENCE, BY GRANTING AN EXTENSION, THEY CONTINUE TO BE IN VIOLATION.
THERE HAS BEEN NO FURTHER COMMUNICATION FROM THE OWNER TO THE COURT ENFORCEMENT OFFICE.
TAX RECORDS SHOWS PROPERTY TAXES ARE TYPICALLY PAID ANY WORK.
THIS BOARD ORDERS WILL BE INVOICED TO THE PROPERTY IN THE OWNER'S NAME.
THE BOARD WILL NEED TO DECIDE IF BATEMAN WILL BE THE CITY SIMPLY HAS THE TARPS ARE REMOVED OR THE CITY ALSO HIRES A CONTRACTOR TO MAKE NECESSARY REPAIRS TO THE ROOF.
STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT THE BOARD DECLARED A PROPERTY A NUISANCE AND THAT THE BOARD ORDERS STAFF TO HAVE THE CONTRACTOR REPAIR THE PROPERTY.
ANY QUESTIONS? YOU SAID YOU HAD SOME SORT OF DISCUSSIONS WITH RESIDENTS OF THE PROPERTY.
WAS THAT WITH THE OWNER OR DID THEY HAVE A, SOME SORT OF TENANT IN THE PROPERTY? NO, THEY, THEY, IT IS OWNER OC, OWNER OCCUPIED.
UH, MY INSPECTOR THAT WAS, THAT WORKED THE VIOLATION, HAD A CONVERSATION WITH THE SON OF THE OWNERS.
MOM AND DAD DON'T HAVE ANY MONEY.
THERE ARE FIBERGLASS PANELS, THE TYPE THAT I THINK CAN BE PURCHASED.
THE TARPS HAVE BEEN THERE TO THE POINT THAT THEY WERE DETERIORATED.
WE WERE GETTING COMPLAINTS FROM THE NEIGHBORS AND WE TRIED TO WORK WITH THEM REALIZING THERE MIGHT BE SOME FINANCIAL SETBACKS FOR THEM.
WE GOT TO A POINT WHERE IT'S GO OR NO GO.
AND WHEN WE GAVE THEM THE OPPORTUNITY TO COMMUNICATE WITH US WHEN THEY GOT A ROOFER, WE HEARD NOTHING FROM THEM.
THERE HAD BEEN DOOR KNOCKS AND THERE HAVE BEEN PHONE CALLS, NO RESPONSE.
SO AT THIS POINT IN TIME, IT'S TIME TO MOVE FORWARD.
SO YOU STAYED IN THE UH, UH, REPORT THERE THAT THERE HAS BEEN EXTENSIONS GRANTED BEFORE.
HAD THEY BEEN BEFORE THIS BOARD? NO, NO, NO.
THIS WAS AN EXTENSION GRANTED BY THE ZONING OFFICER.
TO FIND A ROOFER, IF YOU WILL.
ALL HE WANTED TO DO WAS HEAR BACK FROM THEM.
WE FOUND SOMEBODY NO COMMUNICATION.
YOU KNOW, WE, HE BENT OVER BACKWARDS TO HELP THESE FOLKS OUT.
[00:15:01]
ELSE? SO IF THE TARP'S DETERIORATED, IT'S PROBABLY NOT DOING ANY GOOD ANYWAY.SO I I WOULD TEND TO AGREE WITH YOU.
WE'RE GONNA FIND OUT MY, SO THIS IS THE BOARD'S RECOMMENDATION.
I'M NOT GONNA TRY TO INFLUENCE THE BOARD, BUT AT THE VERY LEAST, THOSE TARPS ARE COMING OFF BECAUSE THEY'RE HAVING A LIGHTING INFLUENCE ON THE REST OF THE PROPERTY.
IT'S A WELL WORN PROPERTY, IF YOU KNOW WHAT I MEAN.
NOW YOUR REPORT, UH, ASKS US TO DO ONE OF, TO PICK ONE OF TWO OPTIONS.
I IMAGINE PUTTING A NEW TERM ON THERE WILL BE THE CHEAPER OF THE TWO OPTIONS.
DO THE REPAIRS, I IMAGINE, IMAGINE THAT WOULD JUST BE OVER THE AREA THAT'S DIRECTLY DAMAGED, CORRECT? OR, YES.
AND, AND MY RECOMMENDATION IS NOT TO REPLACE THE TARP.
THAT ROOF'S BEEN TARPED FOR A VERY, VERY LONG TIME.
AND WE KNOW IF THERE'S A TARP, THERE'S A REASON THERE'S A TARP.
THAT MEANS THE ROOF IS LEAKING AND THEY'RE NOT MAINTAINING IT.
SO OUR FEELING IS IT'S TIME FOR THOSE TARPS TO COME OFF.
AND WE DON'T KNOW WHERE THE ROOF'S LEAKING.
WE DON'T KNOW IF THE ROOF'S LEAKING.
THE TARPS ARE THERE FOR A REASON.
UM, BUT THE COMMUNICATION WE'VE HAD FROM SURROUNDING PROPERTIES IS THOSE TARPS NEED TO COME OFF.
WE'RE TIRED OF LOOKING AT THEM.
AND I, I CAN'T DISAGREE WITH THAT.
AND I THINK REPLACING A TARP WITH THE TARP IS JUST POSTPONING THE INEVITABLE.
NOW, IF WE WERE TO ORDER A REPAIR OF THE ROOF, I WHAT I JUST WHAT WOULD, WHAT WOULD OCCUR IF WHEN THEY GO TO REPAIR, IF THEY DISCOVER THERE'S UNDERLYING ISSUES BENEATH THE ROOF FROM THE LEAKING? SO LIKE THE, THE SUBSTRUCTURE? WELL, SO MONTGOMERY COUNTY BUILDING DEPARTMENT RULES REQUIRE THE FOLLOWING.
IF YOU'RE REMOVING SHEATHING AND ROOFING AND THAT'S ALL YOU'RE REPLACING, THEN THERE'S NO INSPECTION OR PERMIT REQUIRED.
IF SUBSTRUCTURE IS DAMAGED WHERE YOU HAVE TO, YOU HAVE TO DO THAT, THEN YOU HAVE TO GET A PERMIT FROM MONTGOMERY COUNTY.
'CAUSE THAT REQUIRES A BUILDING INSPECTION.
I DON'T ANTICIPATE THIS GOING THAT LONG.
THE TYPE OF ROOF THIS IS, IS SOMETHING THAT'S BEEN PUT IN PLACE.
UM, THEY LOOK ALMOST TRANSLUCENT.
THE INSPECTOR WHO WORKED THAT VIOLATION, UH, I THINK DID A LITTLE BIT OF INVESTIGATING HIMSELF AND FEELS THOSE PANELS ARE AVAILABLE LOCAL AT ONE OF THE BIG BOXES.
I MEAN, HE WENT OUT OF HIS WAY TO TRY TO HELP THESE FOLKS OUT.
SO WE FEEL THAT A REPAIR IS FEASIBLE, WON'T BE TERRIBLY EXPENSIVE, BUT WE'RE NOT GONNA REBUILD SOMEBODY'S ROOF FOR THEM.
I, I, YOU KNOW, I REALIZE THAT, THAT WE HAVE A BUDGET, BUT I FEEL LIKE WE HAVE TO BE DILIGENT WITH TAXPAYER MONEY IN SOMETHING LIKE THIS.
ANYBODY ELSE HAVE QUESTIONS? ANYONE? ALRIGHT.
YOU'RE WELCOME TO DECIDE WHICH ONE YOU'RE GOING THE MOTION, RIGHT? OKAY.
THE MOTION FIT? I HEAR THE MOTION, YEAH.
AND BY THE WAY, THE FACT THAT I DIDN'T HAVE A STAFF REPORT WAS MY FAULT ON HERS.
HUH? WE'RE NOT GONNA HOLD OH, SHE WOULD IF I DIDN'T CLARIFY THAT JUST THEN.
UH, I'M GONNA OBTAIN A MOTION, PLEASE.
UM, I'LL MAKE A MOTION THAT WE DECLARE THE PROPERTY A NUISANCE, REMOVE THE TARP AND HAVE THE ROOF REPAIRED.
OKAY, I THINK THAT SOUNDS GOOD.
SO I WANNA MAKE A, I WANNA MAKE A NOTE OF THAT.
UH, REMOVE TARP, REMOVE THE TARPS AND REPAIR AND REPAIR AS NEEDED.
SO THE MOTION AND SECOND HAS HAPPENED AND NOW WE TAKE A VOTE.
MOTION CARRIES FOR P M R B CASE 23 DASH 12.
CONTINUING ON P M R B CASE 23 DASH 13.
THE PROPERTY OWNER, DENNIS HATMAKER, IS IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 1313 0.05 C OF THE PROPERTY MAINTENANCE CODE OF PROPERTY LOCATED AT 68 29 PABLO DRIVE.
THIS IS A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY.
IT HAS RECEIVED THE NORMAL COURSE OF THREE LETTERS DURING THE MONTH OF MAY A.
PABLO DRIVE IS IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 13 13 0 5 C REGARDING DEBRIS REMOVAL SECTION 13 13 0 5 C STATES ALL CAR ALL YARDS, QUARTS OR LOTS SHALL BE
[00:20:01]
KEPT FREE OF UNSIGHTLY MATERIALS NOT APPROPRIATE TO THE AREA AND DEBRIS WHICH MAY CAUSE A FIRE HAZARD OR MAY ACT AS A BREEDING PLACE FOR FERMENT AND INSECT.ALL PREMISES SHALL BE REASONABLY FREE FROM WASTE PAPER AND OTHER TRASH AND DEBRIS INSPECTION.
VERIFIES THAT THE PROPERTY DOES NOT MEET THE STANDARDS SET FORTH IN THE CODE, THEREFORE THE PROPERTY IS IN VIOLATION.
YOUR ATTACHED CASE REVIEW ILLUSTRATES THE VIOLATION PROCESS AND NON-COMPLIANCE OF THE PROPERTY.
CITY ZONING LETTERS MAILED TO THE OWNER OF RECORD HAVE NOT BEEN RETURNED.
THERE HAS BEEN NO COMMUNICATION FROM THE OWNER TO THE CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICE.
THE TAX RECORD SHOWS PROPERTY TAXES ARE TYPICALLY PAID ANY WORK.
THIS BOARD ORDERS WILL BE INVOICED TO THE PROPERTY AND THE OWNER'S NAME.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS THE BOARD DECLARE PROPERTY A NUISANCE.
THE BOARD ORDERS STAFF TO HAVE THE CITY CONTRACTOR TO ABATE THE PROPERTY, WHICH WILL MEAN REMOVAL OF ALL THE DEBRIS.
DO YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS? ANYONE HAVE A MOTION PLEASE? I MOVE.
WE DECLARE THE PROPERTY A NUISANCE AND HAVE STAFF ABATE IT.
SO A MOTION CARRIES FOR P M R B CASE 23 DASH 13.
NEXT CASE P M R B CASE OR P M RRB 23 DASH 14.
THE PROPERTY OWNER, ALEC MORLOCK, IS IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 1313 0.05 C OF THE PROPERTY MAINTENANCE CODE AND PROPERTY LOCATED AT 72 51 ROBINDALE STREET.
AND MR. CHAIRMAN, THIS IS A RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY.
UH, THIS, UH, VIOLATION BEGAN IN DECEMBER, RAN THROUGH DECEMBER AND EARLY JANUARY.
THE RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY IS IN VIOLATION OF A SECTION 13 13 0 5 C REGARDING DEBRIS REMOVAL.
A LARGE TREE HAS FALLEN ON THE PROPERTY NEEDING REMOVAL SECTION 13 13 0 5 STATES ALL YARDS, QUARTS OR LOTS SHALL BE KEPT FREE OF UNSIGHTLY MATERIALS NOT APPROPRIATE TO THE AREA AND DEBRIS WHICH MAY CAUSE A FIRE HAZARD ACT AS A BREEDING PLACE FOR MENT INSECTS.
ALL PREMISES SHALL BE REASONABLY FREE FROM WASTE PAPER AND OTHER TRASH AND DEBRIS INSPECTION VERIFIES THE PROPERTY DOES NOT MEET THE STANDARDS SET FORTH IN THE CODE, THEREFORE, THE PROPERTY IS IN VIOLATION.
YOUR ATTACHED CASE REVIEW ILLUSTRATES THE VIOLATION PROCESS AND NON-COMPLIANCE OF THE PROPERTY.
CITY'S ZONING LETTERS MAILED TO THE OWNER OF RECORD HAVE NOT BEEN RETURNED IN EARLY JANUARY.
THE PROPERTY OWNER REQUESTED AN EXTENSION AND WAS GRANTED AN ADDITIONAL TWO WEEKS TO REMOVE THE FALLEN TREE REINSPECTION IN JANUARY AND FEBRUARY.
FOUND THE FALLEN TREE STILL INTACT, MEANING IT WAS STILL IN PLACE.
THE TAX RECORD SHOWS PROPERTY TAXES ARE TYPICALLY PAID ANY WORK.
THIS BOARD ORDERS WILL BE INVOICED TO THE PROPERTY AND THE PROPERTY AND THE OWNER'S NAME.
THE BOARD STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS THE BOARD DECLARE THE PROPERTY A NUISANCE.
THE BOARD ORDERS STAFF TO HAVE THE CITY CONTRACTOR ABATE THE PROPERTY.
ANY QUESTIONS? ANYONE? HOW LONG DID YOU SAY THE TREE HAD BEEN THERE? WE FOUND, WE DISCOVERED IT IN DECEMBER.
UH, THERE WERE EXTENSIONS THAT WERE GRANTED REQUESTED.
AND GRANTED IT WAS REINSPECTED IN JANUARY AND FEBRUARY, NOTHING WAS DONE.
SO THAT'S AT THE POINT WHERE IT GOT INTO OUR AGENDA TO BE PUT ON PM B'S RECORD.
ONCE WE HAD ENOUGH CASES TO UH, FEEL WE WERE READY TO COME FORWARD TO THE BOARD.
ANYONE ELSE HAVE A VOTE OR A VOTE? MAY WE HAVE A MOTION PLEASE? I MOVE THAT THE BOARD DECLARE THE PROPERTY A NA, A NUISANCE AND THE CITY ABATE THE PROPERTY.
ALRIGHT, I HAVE A SECOND, PLEASE.
P M R B CASE 23 DASH 14 MOTION IS CARRIED.
THE PROPERTY OWNER KALINDA OCTAVE IS IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 1313 0.05 C OF THE PROPERTY MAINTENANCE CODE OF PROPERTY LOCATED AT 48 74 NEPTUNE LANE.
UH, I HAVE SOME GOOD NEWS TO REPORT.
THIS PROPERTY HAS BECOME COMPLIANT.
ALL THE DEBRIS HAS BEEN REMOVED, SO I WOULD REQUEST THE BOARD DISMISS THIS CASE.
ALRIGHT, UH, WE'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO DISMISS.
[00:25:01]
YES.SELECT MOTION CARRIES TO DISMISS CASE P M RRB 23 DASH 15.
UH, LAST CASE ON THE AGENDA OF THIS EVENING, P M R B CASE 23 DASH 16.
THE PROPERTY OWNER ZACHARY WALTON, IS IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 1313 0.05 C OF THE PROPERTY MAINTENANCE CODE AND PROPERTY LOCATED AT 59 85 FOX TRACE COURT.
I STILL ENJOYED MY TIME AT THE PODIUM.
I DECIDED TO RETURN SO THAT, THAT'S MY STORY AND THAT'S WHY WE'RE COLLECTING, UH, THE RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY AT 59 85.
FOX TRACE COURT IS IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 13 13 0 5 REGARDING DEBRIS REMOVAL.
THIS HOUSE HAS BEEN VACANT FOR SEVERAL YEARS.
ALL I WILL, I'LL MODIFY THAT BY SAYING I'VE BEEN DOING THIS FOR 15 YEARS.
IT'S BEEN VACANT THE ENTIRE TIME I'VE WORKED FOR THE CITY.
WE'VE CUT THIS GRASS EVERY YEAR, ALL YEAR LONG FOR YEARS AND YEARS AND YEARS HAVING SAID THAT.
SO WE MOWED IT SEVERAL TIMES PER YEAR BY THE CITY CONTRACTOR.
DEBRIS PILE ON THE DECK AND ANY SUBSEQUENT ADDITIONAL DEBRIS IS IN NEED OF REMOVAL.
IT APPEARS THAT OVER THE COURSE OF TIME, AS HAS BEEN CUT, AS DEBRIS HAS FALLEN FROM TREES, THE CUTTERS HAVE SIMPLY PUT IT UP ON THE DECK AND THERE IT IS.
SECTION 13 AT 1305 C STATES ALL YARDS, COURTS OR LOTS SHALL BE KEPT FREE OF UNSIGHTLY MATERIALS NOT APPROPRIATE TO THE AREA AND DEBRIS WHICH MAY CAUSE A FIRE HAZARD OR MAY ACT AS A BREEDING PLACE FOR VERMIN OR INSECTS.
ALL PREMISES SHALL BE REASONABLY FREE FROM WASTE PAPER AND OTHER TRASH AND DEBRIS INSPECTION VERIFIES THE PROPERTY DOES NOT MEET THE STANDARDS SET FORTH IN THE CODE, THEREFORE THE PROPERTY IS IN VIOLATION.
YOU ATTACH CASE REVIEW ILLUSTRATES THE VIOLATION PROCESS AND NON-COMPLIANCE OF THE PROPERTY.
CITY LETTERS MAILED TO THE OWNER OF RECORD HAVE NOT BEEN RETURNED.
THERE HAS BEEN NO COMMUNICATION FOR THE OWNER TO THE CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICE.
THE TAX RECORD SHOWS PROPERTY ATTACHMENTS ARE TYPICALLY PAID ANY WORK.
THIS BOARD ORDERS WILL BE INVOICED TO THE PROPERTY AND THE OWNER'S NAME.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS TO THE BOARD, DECLARE THE PROPERTY A NUISANCE AND THAT THE BOARD ORDER CITY STAFF TO HAVE THE PROPERTY ABATED.
WELL, SO NOBODY HAS BEEN THERE FOR 15.
NO ONE HAS LIVED THERE AS LONG AS I'VE IT IT AND IT IT'S A CUL-DE-SAC.
FOX TRACE IS A CUL-DE-SAC OF NEWER HOMES.
AND UM, I AM NOT AWARE THAT ANYONE'S LIVED THERE AT, AT LEAST IN THE TIME I WAS EVER INVOLVED WITH THAT PROPERTY WHEN I WAS IN THE FIELD.
AND SUBSEQUENTLY WE CUT IT PROBABLY SIX TIMES, SIX TO EIGHT TIMES A SEASON.
SO YOU'RE SURPRISED THEY HAVEN'T SOLD IT? I DON'T KNOW.
IT LOOKS LIKE IT'S TRANSFERRED A FEW TIMES OVER THE LAST SEVERAL YEARS.
I THINK IT'S ALWAYS BEEN IN HIS NAME, BUT I DON'T KNOW IF IT'S ONE OF THOSE SITUATIONS WHERE IT'S BEING PAID OUT OF A TRUST OR WHAT THE SITUATION IS, BUT NONETHELESS IT IS WHAT IT'S OKAY.
ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? ANYONE? I'VE GOT A QUESTION.
HOW DID YOU SAY ALL THE DEBRIS GOT ON THE DECK? WE BELIEVE PROBABLY WAS JUST AS, AS HAS THE GRASS HAS BEEN CUT OVER THE YEARS AS THE DEBRIS IS IN THE WAY, IT HAS TO BE MOVED OUT OF THE WAY FOR THE CUTTERS TO GO IN.
YOU HAVE TO REALIZE WHEN WE'RE CUTTING PROPERTIES AS A MAINTENANCE FUNCTION, IT IS STRICTLY A MAINTENANCE FUNCTION.
IT IS GET IN AND GET OUT, CUT THE GRASS, DO THE TRIMMING IF IT NEEDS TO BE DONE.
UH, SO THEY'RE SIMPLY MOVING OBSTRUCTIONS OUT OF THEIR WAY SO THEY CAN DO THEIR JOB TRANSFER.
SIR, COULD I ENTERTAIN A MOTION PLEASE? I'LL MAKE A MOTION THAT WE DECLARE THE COPY OF NUISANCE AND HAVE IT ABAD.
SECOND, SECOND, AND A VOTE PLEASE.
MOTION CARRIES FOR P M R B CASE 23 DASH 16.
ALRIGHT, MOVING ON WITH OUR AGENDA.
IT LOOKS LIKE THERE'S NO ADDITIONAL BUSINESS.
AND, UH, ARE THERE ANY COMMENTS REGARDING THE MINUTES OF JUNE THE EIGHTH, 2020 THREE'S MEETING? IF THERE'S NO OBJECTION, THE MINUTES OF JUNE 8TH, 2020 3:00 PM R B MEETING ARE APPROVED.
UPCOMING MEETING AGAINST OUR NEXT MEETING'S AUGUST THE 10TH AND ONE AUGUST THE 24TH.
[00:30:02]
SO I WANNA SAY THAT WE'VE BEEN HAVING ONE A MONTH AT THE END OF THE MONTH, EXCUSE ME, BUT WHERE WE HAVE MORE CASES, WE WILL HAVE A MEETING AUGUST 10TH.SO KNOW THAT SOME OF YOU MAY BE HAVE OTHER PLANS, SO JUST LET US KNOW.
BUT WE'LL PROBABLY HAVE TWO A MONTH FOR A COUPLE OF MONTHS JUST TO KIND OF CLEAR UP THE CASES.
YEAH, WE'RE, WE'RE GETTING QUITE THE PORTFOLIO OF CASES AND I DON'T, I DON'T THINK WE WANT TO BRING MORE THAN HALF A DOZEN OR SO TO THE BOARD AT A TIME.
WE ALSO WANT TO, DON'T WANNA OVERLAY THE CONTRACT OR WHETHER THERE IS EXPECTATIONS AS A RESULT OF THAT.
ANY OTHER COMMENTS, QUESTIONS, OR ANYTHING? IF NOT, I WILL ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO ADJOURN.